LoooSeR Posted September 20, 2015 Report Share Posted September 20, 2015 PL-01 model is insult to majority of models of real AFVs. At least T-14 have some steel in it, not just plywood ;-) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ShamefurDispray Posted September 20, 2015 Report Share Posted September 20, 2015 I wonder what insane make-believe stats they'll give the Siemka PL-01 so it can compete with the T-14 at tier 10. It will be virtually invisible. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sturgeon Posted September 20, 2015 Report Share Posted September 20, 2015 I wonder what insane make-believe stats they'll give the Siemka PL-01 so it can compete with the T-14 at tier 10. Khand's internal representation of Sturgeon: "SIEMAAAA FORTY TO ONE POLISH TECH BEST TECH SO INVISIBLE SO ANGLED SO STEALTH POLSKA CAN INTO SPAAAAACE RADOM RADOM RADOM POLSKA SIEMA PLZ" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SuperComrade Posted September 25, 2015 Report Share Posted September 25, 2015 I tried the stress test, and I don't know. Game has potential, but it is so unpolished, even though that's to be expected.The HEAT mechanic is weird to me because I expected the complete opposite of higher damage/lower penetration Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LoooSeR Posted September 25, 2015 Report Share Posted September 25, 2015 HEAT should had different mechanics - damage should have been tied to penetration. The more HEAT jet penetrates, the less damage potential it have. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrashbotUS Posted September 26, 2015 Report Share Posted September 26, 2015 I didn't like the HEAT mechanics. Other than that, it seems fun enough. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LoooSeR Posted October 2, 2015 Report Share Posted October 2, 2015 I was checking my mail, and Mail.ru tryed to make sure that i saw their Armored Warfare new Tanks game. That is 5 adv. of AW at this page alone. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrashbotUS Posted October 14, 2015 Report Share Posted October 14, 2015 Now it's in open beta. Tanks still feel like you are driving a boat. It guess it's fun enough if I don't take it seriously. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SuperComrade Posted October 14, 2015 Report Share Posted October 14, 2015 Nothing like facing T-90s in PvE with a T-64 or OF-40 because the game has to find a match for that lone MBT-70 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike E Posted October 14, 2015 Report Share Posted October 14, 2015 Now it's in open beta. Tanks still feel like you are driving a boat. It guess it's fun enough if I don't take it seriously. Someone hasn't driven a light.... Try the scorpion. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SuperComrade Posted October 14, 2015 Report Share Posted October 14, 2015 Or the BMP. Hoo boy is that thing fun Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Collimatrix Posted October 14, 2015 Report Share Posted October 14, 2015 AW has made a mistake that the WOT developers foreswore with the armor model; WOT has reasonably simple armor mechanics, and they still confuse newbies. AW has much more complicated mechanics (that aren't even particularly realistic), which, so far as I can see, exist only to confuse newbies. Be honest, how long did it take you to really figure out and work with WOT's armor mechanics? A week? A month? How many players are going to quit the game in frustration? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SuperComrade Posted October 14, 2015 Report Share Posted October 14, 2015 There is a piece of equipment in that game that magically enhances shell normalisation Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrashbotUS Posted October 14, 2015 Report Share Posted October 14, 2015 I had a BMP and Scorpion prior to the wipe. When I say handle like boats I mean they feel like they are floating and behave like a pleasure boat. The lights feel like jet skis and the tanks feel like pontoon party barges. LeuCeaMia 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LoooSeR Posted October 14, 2015 Report Share Posted October 14, 2015 Spin Tracks when? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Walter_Sobchak Posted October 14, 2015 Report Share Posted October 14, 2015 Technically, it's neither. Originally CDI was chosen to supply concept development and designing in 1976, and ROK/US signed the ROKIT (ROK Indigenous Tank) agreement in 1978. CDI did finish up most of the work by April 1981 following ROKA's ROC (Requirement for Operational Capabilities), but after Chrysler sold CDI to General Dynamics, GDLS picked up the program. It was during the designing process that the hydropneumatic / torsion bar hybrid suspension was introduced. Intelligence of the introduction of T-62 to KPA in 1977 led to ROKA panicking about a second "tank shock", similar to how DPRK was able to push ROK to the Pusan Perimeter back in 1950. Thus, ROC required that ROKIT have the Soviet-style flat shape, leading to the general shape being squashed. Ultimately the turret-only depression was -3 degrees, so hydropneumatic was deemed necessary. This is why you have the suspension itself being practically the same as GM's XM1 (1st, 2nd, 6th wheels are hydropneumatic, 3rd ~ 5th are torsion bar), which allowed kneeling and raising of -7 degrees ~ +3 degrees. The following are the prototypes: PV-1 The turret is a fake one, acting as weight while the hull's mobility and such were being tested. Location is no other than Aberdeen. PV-2 Full-scale prototype, also tested at Aberdeen. While most of this would make it into production, there were issues with the diesel engine (AVDS-1790-9A), and when in 1984 the US enforced export restrictions on the engine, ROKA would use the MTU MB 871 engine. After tests, it was time for production. Ok, I have to make a small correction. The engine that was intended for the ROKIT was the AVCR-1790, not the AVDS-1790-9A. These two engines are easy to confuse since they are both 1200HP and are essentially the same with the exception that the AVCR-1790 had variable compression pistons while the AVDS-1790 had conventional pistons. The AVCR 1790 was the earlier engine, it was an attempt by Teledyne Continental to use the variable ratio piston tech they had developed for the AVCR-1100 and AVCR-1360 engines for the MBT-70 and General Motors XM-1 prototypes. Anyhow, the Teledyne engineers messed up the design and the AVCR-1790 had issues. Not long after the AVCR-1790 suffered it's fate, Teledyne was able to get 1200HP out of a conventional piston AVDS-1790 engine by introducing improved turbo-charging and after-cooling. The AVDS-1790-9 1200HP engine is currently in service in the Merkava III and also in the Namer APC (the engine is still in production for this vehicle.) M48A5K, LeuCeaMia, LoooSeR and 1 other 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brick Fight Posted October 18, 2015 Report Share Posted October 18, 2015 I always dug the weird-looking Abrams prototypes in a way. I'm definitely having a lot of fun with Armored Warfare. Obsidian did some interesting things to balance the game out, and I appreciate it. They've created good incentives for teamwork in that each type of vehicle has its own important traits to bring to the field, and all of them can succeed in some kind of a fight. I'm having a lot of fun with BMPs, BMDs, and the Swingfire. The biggest complaint I have is that I feel like the MBTs could use some more health in the earlier stages. It gets better in later tiers when they can hold more in terms of armor, but early on, they tend to just get spotted and blapped by BMPs. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
M48A5K Posted November 5, 2015 Report Share Posted November 5, 2015 I guess that means we gotta check Daigensui's Super Sekrit Japanese Archives the WOT Korean forums. Sumeragi is the one that put M18 in Wargame RD. He(NOT she) was kicked from several Korean internet communities including the WOT forum last year, but seems he's still spreading false and biased information on other forums... Khand-e, Toxn, LostCosmonaut and 4 others 7 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Khand-e Posted November 5, 2015 Report Share Posted November 5, 2015 Sumeragi is the one that put M18 in Wargame RD. He(NOT she) was kicked from several Korean internet communities including the WOT forum last year, but seems he's still spreading false and biased information on other forums... Oh? I'd be really interested to hear more on this matter. (Let's just say we have.....history.) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
M48A5K Posted November 5, 2015 Report Share Posted November 5, 2015 It's a very very long story so just a quick summary for now...got no time these days unfortunately 1. Daigensui(or Sumeragi; 스메라기) first appeared on Korean WOT forum 2 years ago. He introduced himself as a Korean-Japanese woman currently living in Canada and working as a consultator for WOT Japanese tank tree. Then he quickly succeeded in forming a group of fanboys, but not everyone liked him as his fanboys were somehow ruining the forum, and himself was problematic. 2. On June 7th 2014 some WOT players casted doubt on Sumeragi's gender. #Link1 #Link2 3. Then one of the forum members uploaded a series of evidences indicating that Daigensui is not a female, but actually an ex-marine named Kang Seung Jae(this part needs verification as some sources says that he was never a conscript). Other evidences also claim that Sumeragi is a male and banned from numerous forums for his lies, 4. That night the forum administrator(롤랑) invited Sumeragi to a private chat. Admin gave Sumeragi a time to defend himself, but the admin couldn't hear any repliy. 5. During the same period Korean Wargame RD players were complaining about M18 hellcat, which was never used by the ROK army. Then someone found out that it was Sumeragi's fault, and annoyed WRD players joined bashing him. 6. Sumeragi sent his explanations to the admin. #Link1 #Link2 Majority of the Korean WOT and WRD players concluded that Sumeragi's explanations aren't credible enough. 7. Admin made a phone call with Sumeragi. Phone number was from Vancouver, but "her" voice was definitely male's. So now he's kicked from Korean WOT and WRD forums, but that retard currently using a sockpuppet account according to the admin. p.s. He's also famous for pseudologia in other Korean gaming forums. According to Daigensui, he's... * a twenty-something female residing in Vancouver * a lesbian but engaged with "her" cousin * a smartass that graduated both Tokyo and Yonsei university * working in a major company owned by "her" relatives * so wealthy that he can invest $10million rightaway * a distant relative of current Japanese emperor T___A, Donward, Mohamed A and 6 others 9 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toxn Posted November 5, 2015 Report Share Posted November 5, 2015 Well at least it is consistent in terms of modus operandi. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Donward Posted November 5, 2015 Report Share Posted November 5, 2015 That is some fascinating information M48. As Khand-e mentioned, this is stuff that we've suspected for awhile. It's interesting, as Toxn said, that our favorite Alt-History Japanese atrocity apologist plays with the same gamebook. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sturgeon Posted November 5, 2015 Report Share Posted November 5, 2015 Oh yeah, you belong here for sure, M48A5K. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tied Posted November 5, 2015 Report Share Posted November 5, 2015 It's a very very long story so just a quick summary for now...got no time these days unfortunately 1. Daigensui(or Sumeragi; 스메라기) first appeared on Korean WOT forum 2 years ago. He introduced himself as a Korean-Japanese woman currently living in Canada and working as a consultator for WOT Japanese tank tree. Then he quickly succeeded in forming a group of fanboys, but not everyone liked him as his fanboys were somehow ruining the forum, and himself was problematic. 2. On June 7th 2014 some WOT players casted doubt on Sumeragi's gender. #Link1 #Link2 3. Then one of the forum members uploaded a series of evidences indicating that Daigensui is not a female, but actually an ex-marine named Kang Seung Jae(this part needs verification as some sources says that he was never a conscript). Other evidences also claim that Sumeragi is a male and banned from numerous forums for his lies, 4. That night the forum administrator(롤랑) invited Sumeragi to a private chat. Admin gave Sumeragi a time to defend himself, but the admin couldn't hear any repliy. 5. During the same period Korean Wargame RD players were complaining about M18 hellcat, which was never used by the ROK army. Then someone found out that it was Sumeragi's fault, and annoyed WRD players joined bashing him. 6. Sumeragi sent his explanations to the admin. #Link1 #Link2 Majority of the Korean WOT and WRD players concluded that Sumeragi's explanations aren't credible enough. 7. Admin made a phone call with Sumeragi. Phone number was from Vancouver, but "her" voice was definitely male's. So now he's kicked from Korean WOT and WRD forums, but that retard currently using a sockpuppet account according to the admin. p.s. He's also famous for pseudologia in other Korean gaming forums. According to Daigensui, he's... * a twenty-something female residing in Vancouver * a lesbian but engaged with "her" cousin * a smartass that graduated both Tokyo and Yonsei university * working in a major company owned by "her" relatives * so wealthy that he can invest $10million rightaway * a distant relative of current Japanese emperor ah complaing about the m18 back when people gave too shits about the overall quality of Red Dragon, and pointing out that more units does not equal better units and there is no point in putting a shitload of 10 point tanks in the game that are not likely to be used at all by any modern army and your time and resources would be better spent balancing shit like the 25-50 point tanks that would make up 60% of even the most fancy of militaries I guess you can figure out how that turned out= the devs ignored it, and every new thread/patch since the early days is or is responding to a couple of overpowered superweapons LostCosmonaut 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
M48A5K Posted November 5, 2015 Report Share Posted November 5, 2015 I've never liked Sumeragi. I watched the incident, and it surely did worth a popcorn. ah complaing about the m18 back when people gave too shits about the overall quality of Red Dragon, and pointing out that more units does not equal better units and there is no point in putting a shitload of 10 point tanks in the game that are not likely to be used at all by any modern army and your time and resources would be better spent balancing shit like the 25-50 point tanks that would make up 60% of even the most fancy of militaries I guess you can figure out how that turned out= the devs ignored it, and every new thread/patch since the early days is or is responding to a couple of overpowered superweapons Hellcats are...well...useful when used as a bait for ATGMs Donward 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.