Jump to content
Please support this forum by joining the SH Patreon ×
Sturgeon's House

General Naval Warfare News/Technology thread.


Belesarius

Recommended Posts

  • 2 weeks later...

I believe they are the "pallets" that store the 320 rounds in the auxiliary magazine. IIRC each holds 16 and 20 of them would be one ships worth.

Just as a thought, the price appears to be based on a run of 150 rounds. How much would it drop in a run of 2500+ to fill the three ships magazines?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Big G and I talked about this on Teamspeak.  So far as we could tell, the munitions are that expensive because a) they are guided and B) they are unique to the Zumwalt class.

 

About what do other GPS guided munitions cost? 

M982 Excalibur costs $94703 per shell in 2015 (472 shells for 44.7 mil), $305000 per shell in 2011 (100 shells for 30.5 mil) and $276378 in 2005 (127 shells for 35.1 mil).

 

Source: http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a614738.pdf

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

A few quick questions for the folks here:

 

Considering how modern naval combat works, with close to no armor, and heavily relying on stealth, APS and missiles. 
Could a entire navy composed of submarines be possible?  Wouldn't the water help protect the ships against radar, as well as hiding them from visual spotting?

 

I know that you can't just have a submarine carrier and helicarrier as well as landing crafts, but what about the other ships, what stops them from becoming submerged?

 

Is it because of cost? or any other reason?

 

Just some food for thought. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A few quick questions for the folks here:

 

Considering how modern naval combat works, with close to no armor, and heavily relying on stealth, APS and missiles. 

Could a entire navy composed of submarines be possible?  Wouldn't the water help protect the ships against radar, as well as hiding them from visual spotting?

 

I know that you can't just have a submarine carrier and helicarrier as well as landing crafts, but what about the other ships, what stops them from becoming submerged?

 

Is it because of cost? or any other reason?

 

Just some food for thought. 

Radar/Sensor use.  Kinda hard to use radar and other EM sensors when you are under water.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Provisions for sensor masts that poke through the pressure hull are a gigantic pain in the ass, engineering-wise.

 

Anything that makes the hull less than a perfect cylinder greatly compromises it.  The figure I had seen is that if the cross section of an attack submarine's pressure hull were out out of round by a single inch, it would increase stress on the structure by 30%.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lots of stuff breaking.

 

Something in the USS Zumwalt's engine while crossing the Panama canal and a busted arrestor cable on the Kuznetsov which caused a MiG-29K to run out of fuel.

 

https://news.usni.org/2016/11/22/uss-zumwalt-sidelined-panama

https://news.usni.org/2016/11/21/russians-blame-mig-29k-crash-broken-arrestor-cable-engine-shutdown

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lots of stuff breaking.

 

Something in the USS Zumwalt's engine while crossing the Panama canal and a busted arrestor cable on the Kuznetsov which caused a MiG-29K to run out of fuel.

 

https://news.usni.org/2016/11/22/uss-zumwalt-sidelined-panama

https://news.usni.org/2016/11/21/russians-blame-mig-29k-crash-broken-arrestor-cable-engine-shutdown

USN hasn't been having good luck with new propulsion systems lately. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

https://www.mda.mil/news/16news0012.html

 

The Missile Defense Agency and sailors aboard USS John Paul Jones (DDG 53), an Aegis baseline 9.C1 equipped destroyer, today successfully fired a salvo of two SM-6 Dual I missiles against a complex medium-range ballistic missile target, demonstrating the Sea Based Terminal endo-atmospheric defensive capability and meeting the test's primary objective.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I found what I think is an accurate summary of the max takeoff weight issues with the ski-jump carriers Admiral Kuznetsov and Liaoning.  It is possible to get SU-33s/J-15s off of the carrier at full load.  However, it is only possible to do so from one of the take-off positions, and it eats up a lot of deck space.  So it sounds like there's a trade-off between sortie rate and aircraft MTOW for the Kuznetsov-class.  She can either get more planes in the air quickly with moderate to light loads, or fewer birds in the air slowly with full loads.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...

http://www.navy.mil/submit/display.asp?story_id=98719

Quote

At approximately 10:30 p.m., Hawaii Standard Time, Feb. 3 (3:30 a.m. Eastern Daylight Time, Feb. 4) a medium-range ballistic missile target was launched from the Pacific Missile Range Facility at Kauai, Hawaii. John Paul Jones detected and tracked the target missile with its onboard AN/SPY-1D(V) radar using the Aegis Baseline 9.C2 weapon system. Upon acquiring and tracking the target, the ship launched an SM-3 Block IIA guided missile which intercepted the target.

 

Edited by Ramlaen
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...