skylancer-3441
Contributing Members-
Posts
273 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
30
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Gallery
Downloads
Events
Everything posted by skylancer-3441
-
The Soviet Tank Thread: Transversely Mounted 1000hp Engines
skylancer-3441 replied to T___A's topic in Mechanized Warfare
pics of 1200 I've got so far https://cloud.mail.ru/public/5DUi/5UpuLNoCY including those drawings: It seems like they were aware of Cadillac Gage Commando and Panhard EBR- 5,212 replies
-
- soviet
- russian bias
-
(and 15 more)
Tagged with:
- soviet
- russian bias
- kharkovites get out
- kotin number 1 diva of ages
- kartsev did nothing wrong
- reminder that the is-7 had 8 machine guns
- reminder that uvz built more t-34s than khpz
- real life has a uvz bias
- make lkz great again
- t-72 over t-64 all day erry day
- t-80 worst mistake of lkz life
- the object 167t engine was better
- so was object 278 engine
- t-64 so weak it cannot handle glorious t-34 engine which conquered hitlerite germany
- t-64
- t-72
- heavy tanks
-
The Soviet Tank Thread: Transversely Mounted 1000hp Engines
skylancer-3441 replied to T___A's topic in Mechanized Warfare
From otvaga forum - another picture - from the same source, I guess (some ppt file) ...it seems to be distorted- 5,212 replies
-
- soviet
- russian bias
-
(and 15 more)
Tagged with:
- soviet
- russian bias
- kharkovites get out
- kotin number 1 diva of ages
- kartsev did nothing wrong
- reminder that the is-7 had 8 machine guns
- reminder that uvz built more t-34s than khpz
- real life has a uvz bias
- make lkz great again
- t-72 over t-64 all day erry day
- t-80 worst mistake of lkz life
- the object 167t engine was better
- so was object 278 engine
- t-64 so weak it cannot handle glorious t-34 engine which conquered hitlerite germany
- t-64
- t-72
- heavy tanks
-
One may also remember this render: and this one too: or just usual arrangement in Stryker with antimine seats: so - it seems to me like there is now a driver, than 1 person behind him, than 5 seats for dismounts on the left side, 1 person on the right side behind engine compartment, and 4 seats for dismounts behind him and this passageway is gone - well, not that empty anymore, to be precise and btw it seems like they removed this hatch:
-
It seems to me that Waronline does not allows unregistered users to see attachments in full scale, only prewiews which are downsized to width of 100 pix, so - could someone please reupload that to Imgur or smth?
-
https://www.defensenews.com/digital-show-dailies/ausa/2018/10/10/decision-coming-soon-on-who-will-build-prototypes-for-a-new-army-light-tank/ https://www.armyrecognition.com/october_2018_global_defense_security_army_news_industry/leonardo_drs_and_rafael_test_lighter_trophy_vehicle_protection_system_for_smaller_platforms.html
-
and photo from AUSA-2018 apparently there are 8 seats again another photo from twitter:
-
https://forum.snipershide.com/threads/modern-day-marine-2018-updated-with-day-3-pictures.6904078/ some user uploaded bunch of photos made at that MDM-2018 exhibition /unfortunatelly, full-scale photos are available only to users of that snipershide forum, and also for some reason i was unlucky in my attempt to make an acount there/
-
- 1,042 replies
-
- challenger 2
- warrior
-
(and 2 more)
Tagged with:
-
AFAIK there are no chart in (that part of) Kostenko's book, just those two numbers Well, there is a problem of collateral damage. Soviet Army did not recieve about 6,5 thousand revolutionary tanks - that's only untill end of 1970 (probably several thousands more in 1970-1975), and also It took allmost 10 years utill T-72 appeared in production - so by the time T-72 was in production, and T-64 was finally working, kind of, - well, Leningrad, Chelyabinsk and Kharkov design bureaus were designing (if i'm not mistaken, for allmost half a decade already) another revolutionary generation of tanks. (which never entered production, just like another one after that, and another one after that... all the way untill now) (Alternate History scenario on US soil and with infantry carrying vehicles: Sheridan-based version of "austere MICV" enters production in early 70s, and they make several thousand of those, instead of some of M113s, or whatever. And than Bradley as we know it enters production in early 80s just like in real life, but with planned production numbers cut in half, so about 4500 instead of 9000. Nothing else is changed, and of course ASM, than FCS, and finally GCV ends just like IRL.) (one can draw parallels to actual soviet situation with not 2 but 3 new tanks by adding to this - a production of couple of thousand Bradleys with GT-601 gas turbine engine (expected to cost $250k each in 1987 in mass-production, according to "The nearly engine" book, page 151) instead of diesel)
-
according to Kostenko /Yuri Kostenko's book "Tanks (tactics, equipment, economics)"/ - allmost 3 times as expensive (824 thousand roubles including 104 thousand for gas turbine, vs 280 thousand) and he also gave numbers for some sort of "military technology level" - 1.25 for T-80U and 1.15 for T-72B