-
Posts
1,077 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
8
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Gallery
Downloads
Events
Everything posted by Lord_James
-
You must be insane, @XhaxhiEnver; truly. When comparing the cost of a series production, you use a single year’s dollar equivalent, which accounts for in/deflation, because the uncorrected values will indeed skew the final costs. It is a common, accepted practice to use the value of the dollar (or whatever currency) of the first year of production of an item, for all years that the item was produced. Ergo, if you want to compare the unit cost of the M1 over its production run, you would most likely use the value of the M1 in the first year it was produced. Inflation will make the cost higher because THAT’S WHAT INFLATION DOES! It makes the unit monetary value decrease, meaning you need MORE MONEY to pay for the same item. This is why it is imperative to adjust for inflation of goods. One thing you’re not understanding about that $4.2 billion number is that it is for EVERYTHING related to the M1: setting up a new factory and/or re-tooling of old factories to accommodate for the new vehicle (this cost money... like, a LOT of money); acquisition of ammo, fuel, spare parts, and crew pensions and training for each tank planned (make sure they’re not out of parts/fuel within days introduction), and that’s certainly not cheap for 7000 vehicles; worker, electric, and materials costs (it would be ridiculous to think contractor, sub-contractor, and other utility and manufacturing costs would not be estimated and included in the report). I don’t know where you learned to estimate finances, but you should probably ask for your money back.
-
To be clear, we are comparing the M60A3 TTS to the M1 (LRIP or full production), right? I think it would be a little unfair to compare an M60 (first production model) to any model of the M1; that would be like comparing a T-72 to a T-34-85, respectively Anyway, I would ask for you, @XhaxhiEnver, to clarify (at least, for me) which M60 you’re talking about, since there’s several different versions.
-
I need to visit this thread more, if only just to look at the pretty pictures
- 1,634 replies
-
I just rediscovered Prey (2017), made by Arkane studios and published by Bethesda, and I’m pleasantly surprised. It has good graphics and atmosphere, pretty good gameplay and leveling/scaling*, good story, and a pretty decent moral dilemma / thought experiment.$ * taking your time to get everything throughout the levels makes it easier, but your health can still evaporate if you’re not careful. Never felt over powered, just powerful. $ reference the game ‘Soma’ for a similar / the same moral dilemma. It’s not quite cliche, but not overly unique; though, you do have the choice to participate or reject the dilemma, unlike Soma.
-
Thermal sleeve: moderates and disperses heat evenly around the gun barrel to prevent warping. A thermal sleeve usually is in contact (or very close) with the gun barrel, but the shroud of the lynx looks to be a few cm away from the barrel, weird.
- 390 replies
-
- knds
- demonstrator
- (and 9 more)
-
So for the Leo 2A5 and up, they just weld the old EMES hole closed? I thought I remembered something about “whole new turrets” or a “deep rebuild” of the 2A0-4 turrets to get them to 2A5 level.
- 1,525 replies
-
- leopard 2
- protection
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
The Soviet Tank Thread: Transversely Mounted 1000hp Engines
Lord_James replied to T___A's topic in Mechanized Warfare
- 5,212 replies
-
- soviet
- russian bias
-
(and 15 more)
Tagged with:
- soviet
- russian bias
- kharkovites get out
- kotin number 1 diva of ages
- kartsev did nothing wrong
- reminder that the is-7 had 8 machine guns
- reminder that uvz built more t-34s than khpz
- real life has a uvz bias
- make lkz great again
- t-72 over t-64 all day erry day
- t-80 worst mistake of lkz life
- the object 167t engine was better
- so was object 278 engine
- t-64 so weak it cannot handle glorious t-34 engine which conquered hitlerite germany
- t-64
- t-72
- heavy tanks
-
The interesting ship photos/art thread.
Lord_James replied to Belesarius's topic in Naval Discussion
I hope you do, you take great pics. -
Seems to be a trend.
-
Was this kill?
- 12 replies
-
- heavy tanks
- ah dot com is leaking
-
(and 2 more)
Tagged with:
-
T-80 Megathread: Astronomical speed and price!
Lord_James replied to Vasily Krysov's topic in Mechanized Warfare
It would be terribly unfair for the other contestants if Russia used T-34-85s with veteran crews in the biathlon. -
General Naval Warfare News/Technology thread.
Lord_James replied to Belesarius's topic in Naval Discussion
Would counter rotating propellers provide the same benefits on ships as they do on aircraft? -
Has it been blamed on India, yet?
-
The Space Exploration Achievements Thread
Lord_James replied to Sturgeon's topic in Elon Musk: Making Space Great Again
-
In conjunction, good insulation can mitigate some of the inefficiencies of the electric floor heater (and air conditioning in general). Here in the first level of hell (Florida), buildings can be efficiently cooled by having good insulation and keeping the air inside moving; my father does this in his home and can effectively keep the air conditioning off much of the year, except on the hottest days (>33 C). It only gets cold here for a total of 2 weeks, 3 weeks if the planets align, but never much lower than 0 C, so heating is a secondary issue.
-
Well, I mean, another give away that air is a bad heat conductor is that (static) air layers are generally used as insulation in many buildings, and is one of the reasons double paned glass windows are exponentially better at insulation than single paned or laminated glass or acrylic windows.
-
General Naval Warfare News/Technology thread.
Lord_James replied to Belesarius's topic in Naval Discussion
How big can you make hydrofoils? The largest I’ve found is USS Plainview at 300 tons and 67 meters long. Do the forces involved make larger hydrofoils much more difficult? -
RIP LEP, again
- 1,039 replies
-
- challenger 2
- warrior
-
(and 2 more)
Tagged with: