Jump to content
Please support this forum by joining the SH Patreon ×
Sturgeon's House

Vehicles of the PLA: Now with refreshing new topic title!


Khand-e

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, heretic88 said:

 

Yes, unfortunately, these statements are useless. I dont even understand why these are used, maybe marketing? In the same concept, it can be concluded that the M-60A1 is protected vs 125mm guns...

There are huge differences between 30mm projectiles, ranging from the very underpowered 3UBR6 (which is significantly weaker than some then-contemporary 20mm projectiles) to the very powerful APFSDS of the MK30 for example. Exact type of gun and ammunition is needed to evaluate protection.

 

Agreed, it is not a very useful statement, but you see this sort of marketing statement all the time.

How often do you see the statement that a vehicle is protected against 23mm armor-piercing ammunition?  23x115mm API is some pretty weak stuff.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...
4 hours ago, TokyoMorose said:

 

Simple really, hit something really firm at a high speed. Tank roadwheels are tough, but not invulnerable. Something like hitting a railroad track side on at speed may well cause a dent like that.

I thought the front tank wheel cannot be damaged in this way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...