Jump to content
Sturgeon's House

Vehicles of the PLA: Now with refreshing new topic title!


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

for some reason the hull looks like KV-1

676 ‘s model.

Where is the gallery now..... OK, here are some Chinese cold-war prototype tank. 1980s, Type 80 tank with welded turret,this is one of the first Chinese welded tank turrets, as you can see i

Posted Images

9 minutes ago, Serge said:

No mobility demo. 

It tells about the gap betwen China and the west tech. 

 

Yes because clearly 1 random video not showing 1 particular thing about a pure export tank model = tells everything about the tech between China and the West even though it doesn't!

Link to post
Share on other sites
17 hours ago, Ramlaen said:

 

There is some video of the VT-4's autoloader at ~36:20.

Video was posted on the previous page, autloader is basically same as T-72s\90s. VT-4 is export product, so not surprising. 

 

15 hours ago, Serge said:

No mobility demo. 

It tells about the gap betwen China and the west tech. 

This is not a thread for saying idiotic things.  

Link to post
Share on other sites

the NORINCO armor day planned for tomorrow will include the following exhibits:



1. New IFV (tank-based, with unmanned turret), OP pic

2. New tank (certainly a major reveal if true)

3. A ZTZ-59-based "heavy IFV"

4. A Type 89 APC based wheeled assault/transport vehicle

 

Y6H462c.jpg

 

【中国的新一代步兵战车】无人遥控炮塔,猎歼双火控,AR头盔全景显示界面,35毫米埋头弹自动炮,中距反坦克导弹。澳洲羊羔皮座椅,手自动一体变速器,全电驱动,涡轮增压电混合动力,主动反导防御系统。

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Interesting note: the fact it shot down 2 full sized missiles at once actually demonstrates another design intention.

 

That it can effectively counter "decoy" rockets and missiles like the RPG-30 which fires a smaller, inert warhead directly before firing the main warhead, the point of said design is to fool an APS with the dummy warhead and letting the main one pass through unchallenged.

 

In this case, it would simply shoot both down.

Link to post
Share on other sites

More things.

 

The wheeled assault vehicle/APC they talked about.

 

clP0WOh.jpg

 

I'll try to get better screenshots later but, 4x4 and 6x6 MRAP, the latter of which appears to be based on a heavily beefed up and modified WZ-551 hull. both rated to take 10kg of TNT (the 6x6 was tested on video with bionic replicas of people inside during one showing.)

 

KqDBGcw.jpg

 

3iEIu4i.jpg

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
43 minutes ago, Khand-e said:

Interesting note: the fact it shot down 2 full sized missiles at once actually demonstrates another design intention.

 

That it can effectively counter "decoy" rockets and missiles like the RPG-30 which fires a smaller, inert warhead directly before firing the main warhead, the point of said design is to fool an APS with the dummy warhead and letting the main one pass through unchallenged.

 

In this case, it would simply shoot both down.


Correct me if i am wrong, but on the video Zuk posted I only see 1 missile being intercepted by the 2 interceptors?
 

Link to post
Share on other sites
21 minutes ago, Zyklon said:


Correct me if i am wrong, but on the video Zuk posted I only see 1 missile being intercepted by the 2 interceptors?
 

 

Check the slow mo on the video, you can clearly see that another projectile explodes mid air after contacting the first interceptor a split second before the second, more visible missile is intercepted. (that or it was a decoy that was too small to really show up on video.)

 

http://i.imgur.com/BuuLDnX.mp4

 

It was likely fired from a completely different angle making the projectile harder to see from the point of view of the camera, I'd assume to test the claimed 360 degree coverage.

 

Z5bv2IQ.png

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Khand-e said:

 

Check the slow mo on the video, you can clearly see that another projectile explodes mid air after contacting the first interceptor a split second before the second, more visible missile is intercepted.

 

http://i.imgur.com/BuuLDnX.mp4

 

It was likely fired from a completely different angle making the projectile harder to see from the point of view of the camera, I'd assume to test the claimed 360 degree coverage.

 

Z5bv2IQ.png


Welp I guessed that it actually launched 2 interceptors at 1 missile...but yeah camera angle makes it pretty hard to see.
Thx for clearing that up though 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I mean, it was all shown on public video with announcers and demonstration personnel to interview and describe what was happening, I could have someone rewatch it and tell me exactly what it says, but, considering it's currently 3:30 in the morning in China, that may take a bit.

 

Also my wife hates doing long translations so, best not to anger her.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Similar Content

    • By Monochromelody
      The Al Khalid derived from Norinco Type 90IIM MBT. It was in the early 90s, when India started to test their Arjun MBT. Pakistanis looked for a MBT design that could be produced by herself. 
      Norinco provided their own Type 90IIM prototype, this is an MBT design which comprised many Western components, such as engine and transmission. 

      There were 4 prototypes for Al-Khalid development, namely P1, P2, P3 and P4. 
      P1 has a Chinese tank diesel engine with ZF LSG3000 transmission. 
      P2 has a British Perkins CV12 Condor diesel engine with French SESM ESM500 transmission. 
      P3 has a Ukrainian KMDB 6TD-2 2-cycle boxer engine with its own twin planetary gearbox. 
      P4 has a German MB871 engine with ZF LSG3000 transmission, similar to South Korean K1 MBT. 

      Norinco and Pakistanis planned to adopt one of the Western powerpack at first, but due to CoCom (Coordinating Committee for Export to Communist Countries) restrictions, China is under embargo, which means China would not import weapons form Western countries. Obviously P3 powerplant would be the only choice. All those descriptions on the internet about ESM500 in Al-Khalid is fatally wrong. 
       
      The Al-Khalid pre-production batch and production version all equipped with Ukrainian KMDB 6TD-2 powerpack.
      It is an extremely compact design, the engine laid transversely in engine room, twin planetary gearboxes connect to both left and right end. The 6TD-2 has two crankshafts: the front one drives the mechanical supercharger, while the rear one drives the gearboxes. The cooling system covering the whole engine room, the engine itself has no mechanical connection to the cooling system, and the cooling system doesn't need mechanical drive. The cooling system based on a unique principle: exhaust gas driven ejector. The exhaust gas from the engine is injected through the outlet ducting, produce a low pressure in the outlet side, that will suck in cold air from the inlet side. This principle is also used in the T-64, T-80UD and T-84, but as far as I know, Swedish Ikv 91 is the only western tank that have similar cooling principle. 
       
      As a result, the total length of powerpack is significantly shortened, much more shorter than the European powerpack mentioned above. This leads to a spare storage room between the fighting compartment and the engine compartment. This storage is for extra ammunition and fuel, when turret points 3 or 9 o'clock, the top cover of the storage could be opened from outside, containing 10 rounds for main gun, with projectiles on the outsides, semi-combustible charges on the inside.
      The data table from HIT also describe the ammunition capacity as 39+10, means that 22 ready rounds in the T-72 type carousel autoloader, 17 backup rounds scatter around the fighting compartment, and extra 10 rounds could be carried in the storage room. 
       
      The driver of Al-Khalid control the vehicle via steering wheel and an automatic gear control box. The steering wheel and gear control box send electrical signals to the computer, then computer control the hydraulic servo actuator to perform engage and disengage of brakes and clutches, making steering and gear changes, as well as adjusting the speed and torque of the engine.
       
      Mechanically the gearboxes are nearly the same as T-64s and T-72s, but have different side reducer unit. The KMDB side reducer unit is designed as a secondary gearbox, acting like a forward-reverse selector. When both reducers were put into reverse, the vehicle can reverse using the normal forward ranges. From 1st gear to 4th gear, all could be used as high speed reverse, and that's why KMDB said this is a 7F4R gearbox system. And if only one reducer was put into reverse, the track will be driving in opposites direction, causing the vehicle turns within its tracks, a.k.a. pivot steer or center steer. T-84 also applied this driving and steering system.  
       
      The advantages of Al-Khalid's powerpack is the versatility: all 3 types of MBT in the Pakistanis arsenal, T-80UD, T-84, Al-Khalid, share the same engine and gearbox. 
    • By phasers on stun
      Fellow fish - imagine you had some money to develop the "next generation" 20-40mm" modular architecture turret.  Of course, you could talk about sensor fusion, using AI to detect threats, better / more integrated sensors... targetting linked to drones etc... But is this the way forwards. ?
       
      What is the SOTA 30mm turret on the market ? - more importantly, what are it's attributes ?? [ no need to name the manufacturer unless you want to] 
      Built in APS ?
      intelligent Armour ?
      Reconfigurability ?
      Self Repair ?
       
      We all have ideas... what would you see as a truly game changing set of characteristics ?  
       
      I think the T2000 looks interesting and there are some nice turrets from lower profile companies (as seen at AUSA).  
       
      Alternatively, we might be at the end of the roadmap - "gun + armour + sight is good enough"
       
       
       
       
       
    • By Akula_941
      Anti-air bobcat design to take away driver's hearing in maximum efficiency

      SH11  155mm SPG


    • By Belesarius
      http://www.popsci.com/china-builds-worlds-fastest-tank-gun-then-tries-hide-it
       
      New high velocity 125mm tank gun reportedly starting testing for the Chinese military.  Not surprised that the data disappeared off the university website at all.
       
      Edit: 125mm/60? oO

×
×
  • Create New...