Jump to content
Sturgeon's House

Recommended Posts

On 10/31/2019 at 10:28 AM, That_Baka said:

Longer APDSFS ,Bigger Propellant Charge.

 

Based on the drawings, the propellant charges do not appear to be larger.

 

Note that all of the D-91T (2A66) ammunition seemed to use the same propellant charge (the markings refer to the 4Zh77 charge) with the exception of the 9M125 GLATGM.

 

 

Now switching topics a bit,

 

Israeli 105 mm M111 (Hetz-6) and M413 penetrators (Hetz-7 ? @Mighty_Zuk ) :

 

1572619154-israeli-m111-and-m413-penetra

 

 

Conversion of M152/3 (Israeli licensed copy of the M456 HEAT-T) to the M152/6 (FUZAMAN airburst fuze, can also be adapted to the 120 mm M325 HEAT-MP-T ) :

 

1572619654-sans-titre.png

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

http://otvaga2004.mybb.ru/viewtopic.php?id=1988&p=30#p1269585

   Bunch of interesting stuff posted by tankoff from the materials of the conference "Science. Industry. Defense.".

https://npo.conf.nstu.ru/arhiv

 

30 mm AP round with solid-fuel jet engines

https://npo.conf.nstu.ru/file/2017_2.pdf (page 9-14)

7m3jIiq.jpg

   4 engines per round, tungsten core.

 

https://npo.conf.nstu.ru/file/2019/book2019_2.pdf 

   Telescopic catridges for 40 mm ACs. Page 141-146.

5vlcePu.jpg

 

Spoiler

d8P45Cq.jpg

   Simulation against BMP-3's armor.

 

   Page 178-181 of that document

   Development of radio-transparent ammunition for 57 mm ACs. 

KLRYEZS.jpg

   Variants of rounds made out proposed materials with ready fragments.

 

Quote

   To ensure the radio transparency of ammunition, it is necessary to use composite materials, the most suitable of which are: basalt fiber, fiberglass, carbon fiber. Such materials have low dielectric constant and dielectric loss tangent, which ensures efficient dispersion of the radio signal. While the magnitude of the reflected signal in metal structures is large, in the named polymers it takes values from 0.001 to 5 percent.

   Based on the analysis, basalt fiber has the best properties, since it has the highest melting point and strength. Also, the production of continuous basalt fiber is much cheaper than other materials under consideration.

 

 

   That one is a bit unusual - HEAT warhead inside of APFSDS, without explosive filler. Page 190. Uses unusual form inside of a rod, lined with copper and pressure from APFSDS rod to actuate HEAT jet. Proposed to increase penetration of main round.

93p9VmW.jpg

 

Spoiler

TuIEmEv.jpg

 

Quote

   When such an armor-piercing core passes through the armor, it is compressed by the armor material in the comprehensive compression zone, as can be seen in Figure 3. As a result, an elastic-plastic compression wave runs through the armor-piercing core, which collapses the ellipsoid cavity lined with copper, due to which it forms at some focal length distance (F) is a cumulative stream of copper cladding and having a speed above 5000m / s. Which provides additional penetration of the armor and increases the probability of destroying the target.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Similar Content

    • By Ronny
      I see many knowledgeable members here so i decided to make an account to ask some question
      According to many historical accounts, the armor of WW II battleship is very thick: can be between 410-650 mm of steel
      Thick enough that they can even resist penetration  from 12-16 inch canon 


       
      Compared to these massive round, it is probably obvious that missiles such as Harpoon, Exocet will do little or nothing against the armor belt: No penetration and probably nothing more than a small dent.
      Anti tank missiles such as AGM-65, AGM-114 or Brimstone can penetrate the armor but all their warhead will do is penetrating a tiny hole into the massive battleship, it likely will hit nothing significant given that a battleship have massive volume of space). Furthermore, i heard space armor is extremely effective against HEAT warhead as well).
       
      But what if the two are combined? HEAT + explosive warhead: aka BROACH.
      With a frontal shape charged and secondary follow through bomb
      This is the working principles of the system:


       
      BROACH was designed to help small cruise missile penetrate bunkers. So i have some question:
      1- Because concrete and soil are very brittle, unlike steel, I think the precursor charge likely much drill bigger hole in them than it can drill on steel armor belt of a battleship, so even if we use missile with BROACH warhead to hit a battleship, it won't drill a hole big enough to allow the secondary warhead to pass through. Is that a correct assessment?
      2-  Looking at the cutaway of the missiles. How come the detonation of the frontal shaped charge doesn't damage/destroy the secondary warhead or at very least propel it to the opposite direction? 
       
      3-  Can supersonic missiles such as Agm-88 (Mach2) , Asmp-A (Mach3) , Rampage , Asm-3 (Mach 3) , Hawc (Mach 5) penetrate the armor belt of a battleship? or they simply don't have enough velocity and density?
       
       
       
    • By Molota_477
      M1 CATTB
      pic from TankNet.
      I feel uncertain whether its cannon's caliber was 140mm or not, I found a figure at the document AD-A228 389 showed behind, which label the gun as LW 120.But in many ways I've found its data in websites all considered to be 140mm.

      AFAIK,the first xm291(140)demonstrator was based on xm1 tank, and the successor was the''Thumper'' which was fitted with a new turret look like the CATTB but still m1a1 hull(Maybe it was CATTB's predecessor? )

      I will really appreciate if anyone have valuable information to share
    • By Domichan
      Hello all,
      I apologize for the fact that my first post is a question. I am a Dutch collector of medium and large calibre AP ammunition and I recently bought an 105mm APFSDS-T projectile, that is marked with the designation DM53. The 120mm DM53 is well known, but I cannot find any information on the 105mm DM53. I do know the IMI M426/DM63 round exists, for I have seen pictures of that, which would indicate that a DM53 would exist as well, in accordance with the way German ammo designations go. Questions to Rheinmetall, the Bundeswehr and various collector groups have remained unanswered. 
      Among the experts here, is there anyone who has information on this type of APFSDS-T Round?
      Thank you in advance,
      Domichan
       
    • By sevich
      I realize that sandbags provide little to no armor protection, but soldiers still used them on tanks. Would they mitigate the effects of HE warheads, or the blastwave of HEAT warheads?
×
×
  • Create New...