Jump to content
Sturgeon's House

StuG III Thread (and also other German vehicles I guess)


Recommended Posts

On 1/24/2020 at 9:42 PM, SH_MM said:

The second batch of Pumas (for which the budget has already been approved) hasn't ordered yet, as the original batch isn't finished.

 

According to Inspector General of the German Army Gen. Eberhard Zorn, the intent is to purchase 229 Puma IFVs as a second batch. That's the first official number.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 1.9k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

from physical version of Mittler Report issue on KF41 Lynx (low-res scans are posted on htka.hu forum)   So, I've made couple of comparisons, to the best of my ability

A Dingo 2 of the Belgian army was hit by a pressure-activated IED consisting of about 30 kg explosives. The vehicle was part of a German-lead convoy, several German vehicles narrowly missed the IED be

Technical analysis/evaluation of the VJTF 2023 configuration of the Puma has been finished at the WTD 81. Note the hull mounted cameras/thermal imagers for 360° coverage, mounted at the corners of the

That would make 579 Pumas.

 

579/44 equals roughly 13 with 7 to spare.

 

So 1 for refernce at one of the Testing Centers and 6 at the Training Center together with the 8 Driver Training Vehicles.

 

Currently there are 9 Active Bataillons and 2 non Active Bataillons.
 

So you have 2 Bataillon sets of Pumas worth to spare.....

 

Other tidbits from the Newsletter mainly Engineering related:

-New System for Minelaying is in the concept phase
-Introduction in 2028
-Ability for Friend/Foe Discrimination
-On/Off Switch

-New Amphibious Bridging System to replace the M3
-MLC 100 and in special cases MLC 130 for exceptional Loads

-600m worth of Vehicles + 160m worth of Vehicles for Training
-Due to cooperation on the M3 with the Brits there is a possibility of cooperation on developing the succesor system

-Introduction 2030

-Replacment of the AEV Dachs
-Either Kodiak from Rheinmetall or Wisent 2 from FFG

-Delivery 2026

 

Source: http://www.fkhev.de/index.php?id=10&L=1%2F'

Link to post
Share on other sites
13 hours ago, DIADES said:

In service e somewhere around 2050 at this rate :)

 

The last of the 1st Batch is getting delivered this year. The production per year was around 90. But with the S1 and S2 updates happening besides the new Batch 2 Productio it could hamper it a bit but with production halved it should still be done in 5 years.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 2 weeks later...
  • 1 month later...

https://www.janes.com/article/95321/ffg-wins-upgrade-work-for-german-wiesel-1-weapon-carriers

 

Quote

The German Ministry of Defence (MoD) in December 2019 awarded Flensburger Fahrzeugbau Gesellschaft (FFG) a contract to upgrade 181 deployed Wiesel 1 Armoured Weapon Carrier (AWC) vehicles to extend their operational life to at least 2025. The company declined to disclose the value of the contract and delivery schedule.

In June 2017, following a competition, FFG was awarded a contract to build three prototypes of the upgraded Wiesel 1 AWC; these were completed in 2018 and handed over to the German Army for extensive troop trials.

Benjamin Lindsay, senior manager for sales and project development with FFG's Military Programs Division, told Jane's the company will receive batches of 25 Wiesel 1 AWCs without weapons, which will then be upgraded by FFG and returned to the German Army, which will fit government furnished equipment (GFE) such as radios and weapons.

All three deployed versions of the Wiesel are to be upgraded by the company: one fitted with the E6-II-A1 turret armed with the Rheinmetall 20 mm MK 20 Rh 202 dual-feed cannon, with one becoming an anti-tank version and one becoming a reconnaissance version, according to FFG.

The anti-tank version was originally fitted with a pedestal-mounted Raytheon TOW A1 anti-tank missile (ATM) launcher but this is to be replaced by the Eurospike MELLS ATM that is deployed by the German Army in several applications. MELLS is the German version of Rafael's Spike-LR.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

90 mm M36/M41, L/50, HEAT-T M431 (5,8 kg), mv =1219 m/s

90 mm JPz BK, L/40,5, unknown shell type (5,74 kg), mv=1181 m/s

 

It could be expected in case of AP-T M318 (11 kg) mv would be circa 800/m/s when fired from 90 mm JPz BK.

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Wiedzmin said:

one of german report's says that Kjpz have lower muzzle velocity than tank gun  for AP, but still can't find more detailed info 

 

This is quite logical, the 90 mm gun was shorter (L/40.4) versus L/52.5 for the M47 and M48.

 

However, the original requirements stated that the gun tube had to be ballistically on the same high level as that of the 90 mm M41 rifled gun.

Thus, the same 90 mm ammunition as in service with the M47 and M48 MBTs could be fired.

The strength of the metal used for the gun (also called Rheinmetall BK 90 ?) was planned to incorporate the development of future higher performance ammunition.

 

Only HEAT-T and HESH-T ammunition are mentionned in the specific literature.

Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Wiedzmin said:

one of german report's says that Kjpz have lower muzzle velocity than tank gun  for AP, but still can't find more detailed info 

In the video Nick Moran also says it used primarily HEAT and HEP. 90mm AP was already useless vs T-54.

What I find quite interesting, is that the vehicle is remarkably ergonomic. Except the gunner's place, if he needs to use the gun. T-34 level misery over there... Germans couldnt develop an articulated telescope, like the soviet TSh series? The Kjpz would greatly benefit from that. Also a swiveling seat, like in the WW2 Jagdpanzer IV?

Overall seems like a nice vehicle, probably quite useful in ambushes.

Link to post
Share on other sites
On 2/10/2020 at 7:51 PM, Wiedzmin said:

MEXAS for L1

posted by Paul Fredenburg 

8DnSvinJu34.jpg

 

Turret

 

ozqteE7X6R0.jpg

 


Very interesting: anything similar out there for the MEXAS for the cast turret?

 

ETA: wrote welded, not cast as I was looking at welded. Ugh. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 2 weeks later...
On 2/23/2020 at 8:36 PM, Sovngard said:
Michael Jerchel names the TEM-1A rangefinder sight and TRP-1A and TRP-2A commander's panoramic sights while Stefan Kotsch also mentions the TRP-5 and the CIA comes with this :
 
So, who is right ?

 

 

LZn86Qu.png

 

The Leopard 1A5 has the TRP-5(A), the older versions used the TRP-1A or TRP-2A (or the PERI R12 in case of the Leopard 1A4). The TEM-1A rangefinder and the TRP-1A commander's sight were used for the initial model (might have only been pre-series vehicles). The TEM-A2 is basically identical to the TEM-A1, but mounted in a shock-proof manner.

 

No idea what the technical differences between the TRP-1A and TRP-2A are, it might also be a shock-proof mounting or the different ballistic hood cover (there were two versions, with different "lid" sizes). Another explanation for the different designations might be the fact that the TRP-1A had no laser protection filter, but the TRP-2A had one.

 

____

Turret production for the Leopard 1 - 1973. Also shows a few shots and details of the - then brand new - welded turret for the Leopard 1A3. It provided the loader with a rotatable and tiltable sight (seems to be similar to the Kanonenjagdpanzers') - but the Leopard 2 has gone back to the fixed optic. Just like the Leopard 1A4's PERI R12 featured passive night vision, but the Leopard 2's PERI R17 was initially limited to day sight use...

 

 

BTW: has anybody here have informations regarding the EMES 16? There is a man-portable optical rangefinder with this designation, but EMES 12, EMES 13, EMES 14, EMES 15, EMES 17 and EMES 18 all were gunner's sights with integrated rangefinder for main battle tanks, so I wonder if there is also a EMES 16 for a tank.

Link to post
Share on other sites

One of the Kampfpanzer 3 proposals, this one is from Maschninenbau Kiel. IMO it was the best one:

 

Ush0Utr.jpg

 

Three men crew, autoloaded gun in overhead installation (this concept was tested on the VTS1 testbed based on the Marder hull), frontal protection against 120 mm KE (DM13 prototype at the time) and 120 mm HEAT-FS rounds along a 60° arc.

 

hsXVMls.jpg

 

Like on the VTS1, the gun cannot be rotated by 360°, instead traverse is limited to 120° (-60° to +60° from the hull centerline). This was seen as sufficient by the West-German military, as this allowed a single tank to cover an area of 3,640 meters in 1,000 meters distance.

 

JhsDRyg.jpg

 

As Burlington-type composite armor wasn't adopted at the time, the all three KPz 3 proposals relied on spaced armor.

 

rbqGHsg.jpg

 

There were different exact configurations of the proposed vehicle with different crew and engine arrangements. But AFAIK all were designed with the same protectiion level and main gun (120 mm smoothbore gun prototype from Rheinmetall).

Cxj6aWC.jpg

tpK7sO6.jpg


Source: Object-477's weibo blog.

 

The VTS1 ("Versuchsträger Scheitellafette 1" - testbed overhead gun mount 1):

 

hntBP5Y.jpg

 

At the same time Sweden created a similar prototype based on a Marder leased from Germany as part of the UDES-19 project.

 

udes19_rigg2_web.jpg

 

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 3 weeks later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Similar Content

    • By SH_MM
      Found a few higher resolution photographs from the recent North Korean military parade. We didn't have a topic for BEST KOREAN armored fighting vehicles, so here it is.
       
      New main battle tank, Abrams-Armata clone based on Ch'ŏnma turret design (welded, box-shaped turret) and Sŏn'gun hull design (i.e. centerline driver's position). The bolts of the armor on the hull front is finally visible given the increased resolution. It might not be ERA given the lack of lines inbetween. Maybe is a NERA module akin to the MEXAS hull add-on armor for the Leopard 2A5?
       
      Other details include an APS with four radar panels (the side-mounted radar panels look a lot different - and a lot more real - than the ones mounted at the turret corners) and twelve countermeasures in four banks (two banks à three launchers each at the turret front, two banks à three launchers on the left and right side of the turret). Thermal imagers for gunner and commander, meteorological mast, two laser warning receivers, 115 mm smoothbore gun without thermal sleeve but with muzze reference system, 30 mm grenade launcher on the turret, six smoke grenade dischargers (three at each turret rear corner)
       


       
      IMO the layout of the roof-mounted ERA is really odd. Either the armor array covering the left turret cheek is significantly thinner than the armor on the right turret cheek or the roof-mounted ERA overlaps with the armor.
       


      The first ERA/armor element of the skirt is connected by hinges and can probably swivel to allow better access to the track. There is a cut-out in the slat armor for the engine exhaust. Also note the actual turret ring - very small diameter compared to the outer dimensions of the turret.
       
      Stryker MGS copy with D-30 field gun clone and mid engine:

      Note there are four crew hatches. Driver (on the left front of the vehicle), commander (on the right front of the vehicle, seat is placed a bit further back), gunner (left side of the gun's overhead mount, next to the gunner's sight) and unknown crew member (right side of gun's overhead mount with 30 mm automatic grenade launcher mounted at the hatch). The vehicle also has a thermal imager and laser rangefinder (gunner's sight is identical to the new tank), but no independent optic for the commander. It also has the same meteorological mast and laser warner receivers as the new MBT.
       
      What is the purpose of the fourth crew member? He cannot realistically load the gun...
       
      The vehicle has a small trim vane for swimming, the side armor is made of very thin spaced steel that is bend on multiple spots, so it clearly is not ceramic armor as fitted to the actual Stryker.

       
      The tank destroyer variant of the same Stryker MGS copy fitted with a Bulsae-3 ATGM launcher.
       

      Note that there is again a third hatch with 30 mm automatic grenade launcher behind the commander's position. Laser warning receivers and trime vane are again stand-out features. The sighting complex for the Bulsae-3 ATGMs is different with a large circular optic (fitted with cover) probably being a thermal imager and two smaller lenses visible on the very right (as seen from the vehicle's point of view) probably containing a day sight and parts of the guidance system.
       

      Non line-of-sight ATGM carrier based on the 6x6 local variant of the BTR, again fitted with laser warning receivers and a trim vane. There are only two hatches and two windows, but there is a three men crew inside.
       
       
      There are a lot more photos here, but most of them are infantry of missile system (MLRS' and ICBMs).
    • By Monochromelody
      Disappeared for a long period, Mai_Waffentrager reappeared four months ago. 
      This time, he took out another photoshoped artifact. 

      He claimed that the Japanese prototype 105GSR (105 mm Gun Soft Recoil) used an autoloader similar to Swedish UDES 19 project. Then he showed this pic and said it came from a Japanese patent file. 
      Well, things turn out that it cames from Bofors AG's own patent, with all markings and numbers wiped out. 

      original file→https://patents.google.com/patent/GB1565069A/en?q=top+mounted+gun&assignee=bofors&oq=top+mounted+gun+bofors
      He has not changed since his Type 90 armor scam busted. Guys, stay sharp and be cautious. 
       
    • By LostCosmonaut
      Backstory (skip if you don't like alternate history junk)
       
      The year is 2239. It has been roughly 210 years since the world was engulfed in nuclear war. Following the war, the United States splintered into hundreds of small statelets. While much knowledge was retained in some form (mostly through books and other printed media), the loss of population and destruction of industrial capability set back society immensely.
       
      Though the Pacific Northwest was less badly hit than other areas, the destruction of Seattle and Portland, coupled with the rupturing of the Cascadia Subduction Zone in 2043, caused society to regress to a mid-19th century technology level. However, in the early 2100s, the Cascade Republic formed, centered near Tacoma. The new nation grew rapidly, expanding to encompass most of Washington and Oregon by 2239. The Cascade Republic now extends from the Klamath River in the south to the Fraser River in the north, and from the Pacific roughly to central Idaho. Over time, the standard of living and industrial development improved (initially through salvaging of surviving equipment, by the late 2100s through new development); the population has grown to about 4.5 million (comparable to 1950 levels), and technology is at about a 1940 level. Automobiles are common, aircraft are less common, but not rare by any means. Computers are nonexistent aside from a few experimental devices; while scientists and engineers are aware of the principles behind microchips and other advanced electronics, the facilities to produce such components simply do not exist. Low rate production of early transistors recently restarted.
       
      The current armored force of the Cascade Republic consists of three armored brigades. They are presently equipped with domestically produced light tanks, dating to the 2190s. Weighing roughly 12 tons and armed with a 40mm gun, they represented the apex of the Cascade Republic's industrial capabilities at the time. And when they were built, they were sufficient for duties such as pacifying survivalist enclaves in remote areas. However, since that time, the geopolitical situation has complicated significantly. There are two main opponents the Cascade Republic's military could expect to face in the near future.
       
      The first is California. The state of California was hit particularly hard by the nuclear exchange. However, in 2160, several small polities in the southern part of the state near the ruins of Los Angeles unified. Adopting an ideology not unfamiliar to North Korea, the new state declared itself the successor to the legacy of California, and set about forcibly annexing the rest of the state. It took them less than 50 years to unite the rest of California, and spread into parts of Arizona and northern Mexico. While California's expansion stopped at the Klamath River for now, this is only due to poor supply lines and the desire to engage easier targets. (California's northward advanced did provide the final impetus for the last statelets in south Oregon to unify with the Cascade Republic voluntarily).
       
      California is heavily industrialized, possessing significant air, naval, and armored capabilities. Their technology level is comparable to the Cascade Republic's, but their superior industrial capabilities and population mean that they can produce larger vehicles in greater quantity than other countries. Intelligence shows they have vehicles weighing up to 50 tons with 3 inches of armor, though most of their tanks are much lighter.

      The expected frontlines for an engagement with the Californian military would be the coastal regions in southern Oregon. Advancing up the coastal roads would allow California to capture the most populated and industrialized regions of the Cascade Republic if they advanced far enough north. Fortunately, the terrain near the border is very difficult and favors the defender;


      (near the Californian border)


      The other opponent is Deseret, a Mormon theocratic state centered in Utah, and encompassing much of Nevada, western Colorado, and southern Idaho. Recently, tension has arisen with the Cascade Republic over two main issues. The first is the poorly defined border in Eastern Oregon / Northern Nevada; the old state boundary is virtually meaningless, and though the area is sparsely populated, it does represent a significant land area, with grazing and water resources. The more recent flashpoint is the Cascade Republic's recent annexation of Arco and the area to the east. Deseret historically regarded Idaho as being within its sphere of influence, and maintained several puppet states in the area (the largest being centered in Idaho Falls). They regard the annexation of a signficant (in terms of land area, not population) portion of Idaho as a major intrusion into their rightful territory. That the Cascade Republic has repaired the rail line leading to the old Naval Reactors Facility, and set up a significant military base there only makes the situation worse.
       
      Deseret's military is light and heavily focused on mobile operations. Though they are less heavily mechanized than the Cascade Republic's forces, operating mostly armored cars and cavalry, they still represent a significant threat  to supply and communication lines in the open terrain of eastern Oregon / southern Idaho.


      (a butte in the disputed region of Idaho, near Arco)
       
      Requirements
       
      As the head of a design team in the Cascade Republic military, you have been requested to design a new tank according to one of two specifications (or both if you so desire):
       
      Medium / Heavy Tank Weight: No more than 45 tons Width: No more than 10.8 feet (3.25 meters) Upper glacis / frontal turret armor of at least 3 in (76mm) LoS thickness Side armor at least 1in (25mm) thick (i.e. resistant to HMG fire) Power/weight ratio of at least 10 hp / ton No more than 6 crew members Primary armament capable of utilizing both anti-armor and high explosive rounds Light tank Weight: No more than 25 tons Width: No more than 10.8 feet Upper glacis / frontal turret armor of at least 1 in thickness Side armor of at least 3/8 in (10mm) thickness Power/weight ratio of at least 12 hp / ton No more than 6 crew members Primary armament capable of utilizing both anti-armor and high explosive rounds  
      Other relevant information:
      Any tank should be designed to operate against either of the Cascade Republic's likely opponents (California or Deseret) The primary heavy machine gun is the M2, the primary medium machine gun is the M240. Use of one or both of these as coaxial and/or secondary armament is encouraged. The secret archives of the Cascade Republic are available for your use. Sadly, there are no running prewar armored vehicles, the best are some rusted hulks that have long been stripped of usable equipment. (Lima Tank Plant ate a 500 kt ground burst) Both HEAT and APFSDS rounds are in testing. APCR is the primary anti-armor round of the Cascade Republic. Either diesel or gasoline engines are acceptable, the Cascade Republic is friendly with oil producing regions in Canada (OOC: Engines are at about a late 1940s/early 50s tech level) The adaptability of the tank to other variants (such as SPAA, SPG, recovery vehicle, etc.) is preferred but not the primary metric that will be used to decide on a design. Ease of maintenance in the field is highly important. Any designs produced will be compared against the M4 Sherman and M3 Stuart (for medium/heavy and light tank), as these blueprints are readily available, and these tanks are well within the Cascade Republic's manufacturing capabilities.  
       
       
       
       
    • By Sovngard
      Meanwhile at Eurosatory 2018 :
       
      The Euro Main Battle Tank (EMBT), a private venture project intended for the export market.
       



×
×
  • Create New...