Jump to content
Sturgeon's House
Sign in to follow this  
EnsignExpendable

XM1 Not Very Stronk

Recommended Posts

...

 

They're making some bizarre assumptions.  Why is the probability of casualty due to rocket hits mainly a function of the hydraulics catching on fire?  Sure, this issue got a lot of attention in 1973, mainly because they hadn't thought about it before, but another one of the driving causes of crew loss and catastrophic tank loss is ammunition fire.  Ammunition compartmentalization is one of the areas where the abrams is clearly superior to peer designs.

 

Likewise, I'm not sure the person writing this report (is this another one of those military reform hatchet jobs?  It kinda smells like it) knows how infra-red imaging works.  Infra-red imagers are coated with magical, uber-expensive materials that only let through the wavelength of IR that the imager is sensitive to.  The range of frequencies of "IR" (which is a largely arbitrary designation based on the wavelength where our eyesight stops working particularly well to the approximate wavelength where things start acting more like radio waves) goes from 430 THz to 300 GHz, whereas visible light goes from 430 to 790 GHz.  You can make meaningful generalizations about the behavior of visible light, since all those wonderful, diverse colors we can see are very, very close to each other in wavelength.  IR is much harder to make generalizations about.

 

So, the fact that the abrams' turbine rejects more waste heat and rejects it at a higher temperature does not mean that it will have a higher infra-red signature to ground-based IR sensors.  Most tank thermal imagers make images like this:

 

TIS_Image_2.jpg

 

Where the people are bright white.

 

You don't need to do too much figuring with Wien's displacement law and black-body peak radiation intensity calculations to figure that a sensor that can pick up the wavelength that a 37C human body is not necessarily going to be too sensitive to 500C AGT-1500 exhaust.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Similar Content

    • By Sovngard
      Meanwhile at Eurosatory 2018 :
       
      The Euro Main Battle Tank (EMBT), a private venture project intended for the export market.
       


    • By Walter_Sobchak
      I realized that we don't actually have a thread about the British Chieftain tank.  
       
      I posted a bunch of Chieftain related stuff on my site today for anyone who is interested.  The items include:
       
      Magazine Articles
       
      1970 article from ARMOR
      1970 article from IDR  - Chieftain-Main Battle tank for the 1970s
      1976 article from IDR - The Combat-Improved Chieftain – First Impressions
      1976 article from IDR - Improved Chieftain for Iran
       
      Government reports
       
      WO 194-495 Assessment of Weapon System in Chieftain
      WO 341-108 Automotive Branch Report on Chieftain Modifications
      DEFE 15-1183 – L11 Brochure 
      WO 194-463 – Demonstration of Chieftain Gun 
       
      WO 194-1323 – Feasibility study on Burlington Chieftain
    • By Mighty_Zuk
      Welcome to Mighty Zuk's place of mental rest and peace of mind. This is my realm. 
      I've decided it would be best to ditch the old Merkava thread for 2 reasons:
      1)It does not feature any bunched up information in its main post, and valuable information is scattered across different posts on different pages. 
      2)Many AFVs that are not related to the Merkava, or related but are not it, appear in that thread with improper representation. There are other AFVs than the Merkava, and it would be better to refer to them in a general way.
       
      As time will go by, I will arrange this thread into a sort of information center. 
       
      I will take up a few first comment spaces to make sure proper amount of information can be stacked up on the front page and for easier access for everyone.
       
      [Reserved for future posts - Merkava]
×