Jump to content
Sturgeon's House

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.9k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Basically what this whole thing means is that Emperor Palputin will conquer Galaxy with Space Marines and T-72s. T-72B3s to be precise.   I posted this on other Capitalist internet site 3 mo

For future use

T-72B3, T-80BVM, T-90M, T-14, T-15 top view.  

Posted Images

I see the Russkies are attempting to counter the EM-50 Urban Assault Vehicle from the documentary "Stripes". But as typical the Soviet military philosophy, they opt for quantity over quality and are content to spam waves of inferior travel trailers in an attempt to overwhelm NATO's high tech motor homes.

Link to post
Share on other sites

http://www.nationaldefense.ru/includes/periodics/maintheme/2015/0728/143216314/detail.shtml

 

Article about new series of military vehicles in Russian army and a lot of about Armata. Google translations with some edits. 

    .......

    The system of armored vehicles and military wheeled vehicles relies on a unified platforms, class is determined by their weight: heavy, medium and light. A single, unified platform offers maximum unification of the chassis, modules, assemblies, parts, interfaces within the same category of vehicle class. Moreover, unification is provided and between different unified platforms. Such unification logically led to the need for a platforms, built on the principle of "digital electronic vehicle with an open architecture."

 

img16304.jpg

 

    For the first time in the history of the domestic tank production of the Russian Federation, Ministry of Defense in cooperation with the industry in 2010-2011. simultaneously launched development activities (R&D) in key areas of armored vehicles to meet new requirements: a unified heay tracked platform "Armata", unified middle tracked platform "Kurganets-25", unified wheeled platform "Boomerang", unified platform for action in Arctic region "Arctic".

.... 

    Ural Design Bureau of Transport Machinery (UKBTM) creates a family of AFVs on "Armata" platform, Chief Designer - Andrey Leonidovich Terlikov.

 

img16307.jpg

 

    Of particular interest to the Russian Defense Ministry is a pair of "main tank - a heavy infantry fighting vehicles." Presence in the order of battle of this vehicles allows to implement new tactics to meet the most modern techniques of warfare. In particular, heavy infantry fighting vehicles are capable of operating in a single armored battle array along with tanks, suppress and breakthrough a strong defense with high level of antitank capabilities.

    Heavy BMP is on par with tanks and able to overcome areas of concentrated artillery fire with the minimum costs. They can operate at a minimum distance from the first line of artillery support barrage and even "under the umbrella" of frinedly artillery shells. This greatly reduces the possibility of the enemy to counter the attacking troops with new machines. Dismounting infantry can be done at a minimum distance from the defending enemy, almost on his head, as opposed to older BMP models, where infantry dismounting was happening at same distance as the transition to the attack.

 

    The main tank and heavy infantry fighting vehicles have a high tactical maneuverability on the battlefield, because such opportunities are determined not only and not as much as the technical parameters of mobility as the ability to act under fire, to overcome natural and artificial obstacles, ability to suppress enemy firepowe with direct fire. The appearance of the main tank and heavy infantry fighting vehicles on a unified platform allows to realize the concept of "heavy" brigades, organizational and staff structure of which is designed for action against technologically advanced enemy, having a high number of antitank weapons, armored vehicles and artillery.

    

    However, the use of "heavy" brigades against illegal armed groups equipped with light antitank weapons (RPGs), allow to minimize the use of infantry in dangerous places, giving them an umbrella of powerful armor and active protection system.

    

img16306.jpg

 

     One of the key features in the design of the tank "Armata" and the family as a whole is first in the practice of world tank building implementation "digital electronic unit" architecture  The key here is the principle of networking and open architecture. Its meaning lies in the fact that the main element of the electronic unit is a digital information exchange network, which covers all units, components, systems and subsystems. The network provides a standard interface to connect "subscribers". Subscribers are electronic components (microcontroller and microprocessor-based electronic control systems) included (embedded) into functional components, assemblies, systems and subsystems.

     It is crucial that the operation of the digital network in happening in real time and the information is given to all sensors in the network, including commands for all drives and actuators, as well as information on the status of all controls. In other words, the network has in digital form all the necessary information and comands for monitoring and to control tank. 

 

img16305.jpg

 

      As a result, on-board digital network forms a common information space that brings together the various subsystems of the vehicle and ensures the implementation of a large number of interrelated and interdependent functions, including those running simultaneously. Thus, a single integrated machine control system as a whole: an integrated on-board information and control system (In russian it is called BIUS, i will call that system with this acronym). 

 

     The principles of standardization of functional division and interoperability (compatibility) of BUIS components provide multilevel hierarchical structuring functions and means that each subsystem - the "subscriber" of digital network - must have not only a standard digital interface at the physical level, but also a clear standardized protocol for commands and data sharing. A direct consequence of the principle of interoperability is the ability to change combat and functional modules for armored vehicles based on standardized platforms. 

 

img16313.jpg

 

      Multifunctional controls and displays for the crew members provide human-machine interface. Many diverse controls and display characteristic of the previous generation of armored vehicles, now replaced with the multifunction flexibly programmable monitors. It is possible to solve the problem of centralized remote control of a large number of heterogeneous systems, systems and devices by a single operator (crew member), simplify the information and control field, increased ergonomics of tankers work. The open architecture of the digital electronic unit network allows painless and cost-effectively upgrade of individual components and systems of the "Armata" platform as new and better parts appear.

 

img16312.jpg

 

     At a meeting in Sochi May 13, 2015, on the development of the Armed Forces, Russian President Vladimir Putin said: "Another issue - the creation of new and modernization of existing weapons and equipment of the Land Forces. Some of this technology was first shown at the parade in honor of the 70th anniversary of the Victory in the Great Fatherland War. The performance characteristics of this new technique significantly superior to their foreign counterparts, and overall it deserves a fairly high ratings between military experts. It is necessary as soon as possible to complete all tests and move to mass production"

 

img16310.jpg

 

     To make full use of all the possibilities of the "Armata"-based AFVs, an understanding of not only of technology itself, but also the tactics of its application is required. For the full mastery of "Armata" requires at least one, and preferably two half-yearly cycle of combat training that can only be realized with the professional crew. For trained personnel "Armata" provides the possibility of implementing a far greater volume of tactics than previous models.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Loooser I have a few questions for you (sorry in advance :/); 

- Do you have any sources on the Vacuum series of APFSDS? I used to know two, both of which seemingly have been deleted. 

and...

- What is the thin sheet above the glacis for? I have a quick (ah, my excuses) picture; 

dlblc10.jpg

I suspect it is related to the internal armor layout, but would love to hear your thoughts. Thanks :) 

Link to post
Share on other sites

That's basically confirmed, but why go to such a great length over just the tank model? It makes sense that a few features and specifications are transferred.

According to the UVG/AW collab site Tankopedia, the T-90A with Relikt is invulnerable to M829A3 at a range of 1.2 km. Not related to Armata, but still interesting.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is the thing; 

 

The US doesn't have their hands on Relikt, they might not even know the exact layout of it. As such, it is dubious to claim it can *defeat something it was never tested against*. The only feasible way of defeating Relikt is to use multiple tips, which are sacrificed during the process of defeating the ERA. Problem with this is that mass (and hence penetration) will be lost in the process. 

 

T-14 doesn't use Relikt, it either uses an improved version of it, or something completely different. 

 

With 7 gears, a high power-to-weight ratio, lot of torque, and a low ground pressure, cross-country speed should be at least 55 km/h. I can't tell you how fast it can accelerate, but I can tell you that it will be faster than anything in service right now. 

 

T-14 might become unmanned eventually, but it is a long way off. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Similar Content

    • By LoooSeR
      Hello, my friends and Kharkovites, take a sit and be ready for your brains to start to work - we are going to tell you a terrible secret of how to tell apart Soviet tanks that actually works like GLORIOUS T-80 and The Mighty T-72 from Kharkovites attempt to make a tank - the T-64. Many of capitalists Westerners have hard time understanding what tank is in front of them, even when they know smart words like "Kontakt-5" ERA. Ignoramus westerners!
       
       
         Because you are all were raised in several hundreds years old capitalism system all of you are blind consumer dummies, that need big noisy labels and shiny colorful things to be attached to product X to be sold to your ignorant heads and wallets, thats why we will need to start with basics. BASICS, DA? First - how to identify to which tank "family" particular MBT belongs to - to T-64 tree, or T-72 line, or Superior T-80 development project, vehicles that don't have big APPLE logo on them for you to understand what is in front of you. And how you can do it in your home without access to your local commie tank nerd? 
       
       
         Easy! Use this Putin approved guide "How to tell appart different families of Soviet and Russian tanks from each other using simple and easy to spot external features in 4 steps: a guide for ignorant western journalists and chairborn generals to not suck in their in-depth discussions on the Internet".
       
       
       
      Chapter 1: Where to look, what to see.
       
      T-64 - The Ugly Kharkovite tank that doesn't work 
       
         We will begin with T-64, a Kharkovite attempt to make a tank, which was so successful that Ural started to work on their replacement for T-64 known as T-72. Forget about different models of T-64, let's see what is similar between all of them.
       
       
       

       
       
         
       
       
      T-72 - the Mighty weapon of Workers and Peasants to smash westerners
       
         Unlike tank look-alike, made by Kharkovites mad mans, T-72 is true combat tank to fight with forces of evil like radical moderate barbarians and westerners. Thats why we need to learn how identify it from T-64 and you should remember it's frightening lines!
       

       
       
       
      The GLORIOUS T-80 - a Weapon to Destroy and Conquer bourgeois countries and shatter westerners army
       
         And now we are looking at the Pride of Party and Soviet army, a true tank to spearhead attacks on decadent westerners, a tank that will destroy countries by sucking their military budgets and dispersing their armies in vortex of air, left from high-speed charge by the GLORIOUS T-80!

      The T-80 shooting down jets by hitting them behind the horizont 
          
    • By LoooSeR
      I want to show you several late Soviet MBT designs, which were created in 1980s in order to gain superiority over NATO focres. I do think that some of them are interesting, some of them look like a vehicle for Red Alert/Endwar games. 
           
           Today, Russia is still use Soviet MBTs, like T-80 and T-72s, but in late 1970s and 1980s Soviet military and engineers were trying to look for other tank concepts and designs. T-64 and other MBTs, based on concept behind T-64, were starting to reaching their limits, mostly because of their small size and internal layout. 
       
      PART 1
       
       
      Object 292
       
         We open our Box of Communism Spreading Godless Beasts with not so much crazy attempt to mate T-80 hull with 152 mm LP-83 gun (LP-83 does not mean Lenin Pride-83). It was called Object 292.
       
       
       
          First (and only, sadly) prototype was build in 1990, tested at Rzhevskiy proving ground (i live near it) in 1991, which it passed pretty well. Vehicle (well, turret) was developed by Leningrad Kirov factory design bureau (currently JSC "Spetstrans") Because of collapse of Soviet Union this project was abandoned. One of reasons was that main gun was "Burevestnik" design bureau creation, which collapsed shortly after USSR case to exist. It means that Gorbachyov killed this vehicle. Thanks, Gorbach!
       
          Currently this tank is localted in Kubinka, in running condition BTW. Main designer was Nikolay Popov.
       
          Object 292, as you see at photos, had a new turret. This turret could have been mounted on existing T-80 hulls without modifications to hull (Object 292 is just usual serial production T-80U with new turret, literally). New Mechanical autoloading mechanism was to be build for it. Turret had special Abrams-like bustle for ammunition, similar feature you can see on Ukrainian T-84-120 Yatagan MBT and, AFAIK, Oplot-BM.
          Engine was 1250 HP GTD-1250 T-80U engine. 152 mm main smoothbore gun was only a little bit bigger than 2A46 125 mm smoothbore gun, but it had much better overall perfomance.
          This prototype was clearly a transitory solution between so called "3" and "4th" generation tanks.
       
          Some nerd made a model of it:
      _________________________________________________________________________________________________________
       
       
      ........Continue in Part 2
    • By seppo
      Hello,
      this is my first post. Please no bully. :3
       
      Panzerkampfwagen 2000
      In 1988 Germany developed a concept for a tank with two crew men. In order to test whether it's possible for only two crew men to operate a tank effectively, a Leopard 1 and a Leopard 2 were modified. 


      Field trials were held in 1990 and subsequently it was concluded to be a viable concept in 1992. The project was however canceled, because the downfall of the Soviet Union meant, that a new battle tank was no longer needed. Furthermore Israel stealing submarines and reunification meant that the budget was not sufficient either.
       
      Neue Gepanzerte Plattform
      In 1995 a concept for a whole family of armored vehicles(SPAAG, MBT, IFV) was developed, where the MBT would be manned by two man, just like the Panzerkampfwagen 2000. A prototype was build and tested in 1997. However a further budget cut lead to the cancellation in 1998. Wegmann desgin: Turret + autoloader:
      http://www.patent-de.com/pdf/DE19644524A1.pdf
      Diehl developed an APS for this tank: AWiSS


      EGS:
      Hull length = 8,67m
      Full width = 3,98m
      Width between the tracks = 3,5m
      Height = 2,71m
      The intended combat weight for the complete tank was between 55t and 77t.
      Can anyone calculate the the cross section areas and the protection levels for the front and the side, assuming mid-90s filler materials were used?
       
      Thanks for your attention!
    • By Tied
      Yes
       
      i personally support it, by finding the KGB Felix Dzerzhinsky greatly improved state scurrility both inside the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics and abroad (their jurisdiction was only domestic, but they kept the internationally influential people safe at night)   a dedicated defender of both the Revolution and all the Soviet peoples     what do you think of this news?

×
×
  • Create New...