Jump to content
Sturgeon's House

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, LoooSeR said:

It is not current for a long time.

I meant in the latest pictures you posted. Back when Kurganets was first unveiled it had that arrangement but then in other TV shows about the vehicle, other preproduction variants had the driver sitting in front and left of the commander (with the engine by his right), and now again the driver and commander appear to be sitting side by side...its a little confusing to be honest,

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 1.9k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Basically what this whole thing means is that Emperor Palputin will conquer Galaxy with Space Marines and T-72s. T-72B3s to be precise.   I posted this on other Capitalist internet site 3 mo

For future use

T-72B3, T-80BVM, T-90M, T-14, T-15 top view.  

Posted Images

There are several vehicles used for parades only, with engine in front and driver and commander sitting side by side,

 

and then there are other vehicles used for development and testing, with engine at front- right and driver on the left - IIRC none of those ever appeared on parade in Moscow

Link to post
Share on other sites

   Parade versions of Kurganets-25, from 2015.

Bco3ZpG.jpg

 

   In the same time (later in 2015) there was this version shown.

sq0beWO.jpg 

 

Spoiler

NynDKNL.jpg

 

1VGeNX6.jpg

 

   Parade vehicles had different engine mounted because of time constraits. Version shown on prooving ground is one that Army is interested in.

Link to post
Share on other sites

   News about Armata. Translation of this article:

https://ria.ru/20200701/1573690648.html

   Most interesting parts are Victor Murakhovksiy comments. Journalists crap is spread across whole article here and there, sadly (like Armata using Krasnopol laser guided artillery rounds), i will try to throw it away.

Quote

   MOSCOW, Jul 1 - RIA Novosti, Nikolai Protopopov. Fully autonomous system of target designation and firing, smart protection from shells and an ideal engine - the designers brought the T-14 tank on the Armata platform to perfection. The corporation Uralvagonzavod said that the new vehicles has been fully studied and all the shortcomings have been eliminated. About what difficulties the developers faced, - in the material of RIA Novosti.

 

   Children's sores
   The promising main battle tank T-14 Armata has been developed since 2010, and in production since 2014. The latest achievements of the Russian defense industry have been used in the design of the combat vehicle, most of which are being tested on existing models for the first time.
   In fact, Armata is an armored combat computer, stuffed with electronics and autonomous systems - many functions are fully automated and require only control from the crew.
   For example, the Afganit active defense system itself detects and destroys anti-tank ammunition as it approaches, at a safe distance. The complex system includes a pulse-Doppler radar, ultraviolet direction sensors and infrared cameras of all-round visibility.

   "Afghanit" pinpoints any threat - anti-tank missiles are jammed by electronic warfare [i guess ATGMs like Bill 2 or TOW-2B], anti-tank missiles with infrared homing heads are countered with a smokemetal "curtain", and ammunition that still managed to break through to the tank is destroyed by special fragmentation charges.

 

   “There were no serious technical problems with Armata as such,” Viktor Murakhovsky, member of the expert council at the military-industrial complex collegium, tells RIA Novosti. “But some questions nevertheless arose. In particular, with the engine. It developed the necessary power, but its resource did not meet the requirements The Ministry of Defense. Therefore, for the first time, the tank had to be operated in sparing modes. "

   Now all problems with the power plant are resolved. The engine has two modes of operation - peacetime, when the resource is very important, and military/combat - on the battlefield, priority is given to maximum power and speed.
   Engine power - from 1.2 thousand to 1.8 thousand horsepower. Torque is regulated by an automatic transmission. The tank accelerates to 90 kilometers per hour and can go without refueling about five hundred kilometers. The on-board computer completely controls the engine and transmission, informing the crew about the problems and reminding them of the need for maintenance of a particular unit.

 

   The tests revealed some flaws with the fire control system (FCS), which is noticeably different from its predecessors. In particular, because of the software. Operating with a variety of parameters, the FCS is one of the most complex systems in the tank.
   The gun and machine guns "Armata" are aimed automatically. The ballistic computer performs the necessary calculations, the tank determines its position by satellite and inertial navigation system, the computer determines the angular orientation in space, takes into account the direction and speed of the wind, temperature, air humidity and even barrel bending when heated.

   “As for fire control systems, this is a known problem,” Murakhovsky notes. “Thermal imaging arrays with the right parameters have never been produced in Russia. It's no secret that thermal imaging sights for tanks were purchased in France. To start such production out of the blue , it took some time. "
   During the tests, the developers and the military had questions for the "Armata" ammunition. "The ammunition was actually created anew, and not everything worked out right away," the expert continues. "Of course, there were working difficulties that were inevitable when creating the latest military equipment."

/.../

   “Armata” was tested and tested relatively quickly partly due to the fact that many design solutions were borrowed from the experimental tank “Object-195”, which was already worked on in the Ural Transport Engineering Design Bureau in the 1990s.
   “If not for Object-195, Armata would still be only on paper or, perhaps, in one prototype,” Murakhovsky believes.

 

   “Armata” is a new generation tank, the only such vehicle in the world with a fundamentally new layout, ”Murakhovsky emphasizes. - There are no analogues in the world. The entire fire control, reconnaissance and surveillance system is only the technical channels of view, there are no direct optical channels for reconnaissance, target designation and firing. I am sure that everyone in the tank industry will follow this path. We are the first here, like "icebreaker", pushing through all the problems. "

 

   So in short - looks like UVZ implemented changes and fixes to problems found during testing of the vehicle. Engine sounds like received some changes as well and now have 2 modes of operation. New Russian-made thermal imagers were put into production for Armata. Ammunition for main gun sounds like was also brought to serial-production stage (or ready to be produced). 

Link to post
Share on other sites
Spoiler

 

Interesting the bit about the specific ammunition made anew. I guess that can only point to the ´Vacuum´ apfsds. On the other hand the description the author gives about the ATGM also points to what we know about Sokol-V, but the journalist calls it "Reflex-M"

 

ON the other hand, what does Murakhovsky mean by " The entire fire control, reconnaissance and surveillance system is only the technical channels of view, there are no direct optical channels for reconnaissance, target designation and firing" ?

Link to post
Share on other sites
30 minutes ago, alanch90 said:

/.../

ON the other hand, what does Murakhovsky mean by " The entire fire control, reconnaissance and surveillance system is only the technical channels of view, there are no direct optical channels for reconnaissance, target designation and firing" ?

   It means that they are no direct optical sights like on previous tanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Similar Content

    • By LoooSeR
      Hello, my friends and Kharkovites, take a sit and be ready for your brains to start to work - we are going to tell you a terrible secret of how to tell apart Soviet tanks that actually works like GLORIOUS T-80 and The Mighty T-72 from Kharkovites attempt to make a tank - the T-64. Many of capitalists Westerners have hard time understanding what tank is in front of them, even when they know smart words like "Kontakt-5" ERA. Ignoramus westerners!
       
       
         Because you are all were raised in several hundreds years old capitalism system all of you are blind consumer dummies, that need big noisy labels and shiny colorful things to be attached to product X to be sold to your ignorant heads and wallets, thats why we will need to start with basics. BASICS, DA? First - how to identify to which tank "family" particular MBT belongs to - to T-64 tree, or T-72 line, or Superior T-80 development project, vehicles that don't have big APPLE logo on them for you to understand what is in front of you. And how you can do it in your home without access to your local commie tank nerd? 
       
       
         Easy! Use this Putin approved guide "How to tell appart different families of Soviet and Russian tanks from each other using simple and easy to spot external features in 4 steps: a guide for ignorant western journalists and chairborn generals to not suck in their in-depth discussions on the Internet".
       
       
       
      Chapter 1: Where to look, what to see.
       
      T-64 - The Ugly Kharkovite tank that doesn't work 
       
         We will begin with T-64, a Kharkovite attempt to make a tank, which was so successful that Ural started to work on their replacement for T-64 known as T-72. Forget about different models of T-64, let's see what is similar between all of them.
       
       
       

       
       
         
       
       
      T-72 - the Mighty weapon of Workers and Peasants to smash westerners
       
         Unlike tank look-alike, made by Kharkovites mad mans, T-72 is true combat tank to fight with forces of evil like radical moderate barbarians and westerners. Thats why we need to learn how identify it from T-64 and you should remember it's frightening lines!
       

       
       
       
      The GLORIOUS T-80 - a Weapon to Destroy and Conquer bourgeois countries and shatter westerners army
       
         And now we are looking at the Pride of Party and Soviet army, a true tank to spearhead attacks on decadent westerners, a tank that will destroy countries by sucking their military budgets and dispersing their armies in vortex of air, left from high-speed charge by the GLORIOUS T-80!

      The T-80 shooting down jets by hitting them behind the horizont 
          
    • By LoooSeR
      I want to show you several late Soviet MBT designs, which were created in 1980s in order to gain superiority over NATO focres. I do think that some of them are interesting, some of them look like a vehicle for Red Alert/Endwar games. 
           
           Today, Russia is still use Soviet MBTs, like T-80 and T-72s, but in late 1970s and 1980s Soviet military and engineers were trying to look for other tank concepts and designs. T-64 and other MBTs, based on concept behind T-64, were starting to reaching their limits, mostly because of their small size and internal layout. 
       
      PART 1
       
       
      Object 292
       
         We open our Box of Communism Spreading Godless Beasts with not so much crazy attempt to mate T-80 hull with 152 mm LP-83 gun (LP-83 does not mean Lenin Pride-83). It was called Object 292.
       
       
       
          First (and only, sadly) prototype was build in 1990, tested at Rzhevskiy proving ground (i live near it) in 1991, which it passed pretty well. Vehicle (well, turret) was developed by Leningrad Kirov factory design bureau (currently JSC "Spetstrans") Because of collapse of Soviet Union this project was abandoned. One of reasons was that main gun was "Burevestnik" design bureau creation, which collapsed shortly after USSR case to exist. It means that Gorbachyov killed this vehicle. Thanks, Gorbach!
       
          Currently this tank is localted in Kubinka, in running condition BTW. Main designer was Nikolay Popov.
       
          Object 292, as you see at photos, had a new turret. This turret could have been mounted on existing T-80 hulls without modifications to hull (Object 292 is just usual serial production T-80U with new turret, literally). New Mechanical autoloading mechanism was to be build for it. Turret had special Abrams-like bustle for ammunition, similar feature you can see on Ukrainian T-84-120 Yatagan MBT and, AFAIK, Oplot-BM.
          Engine was 1250 HP GTD-1250 T-80U engine. 152 mm main smoothbore gun was only a little bit bigger than 2A46 125 mm smoothbore gun, but it had much better overall perfomance.
          This prototype was clearly a transitory solution between so called "3" and "4th" generation tanks.
       
          Some nerd made a model of it:
      _________________________________________________________________________________________________________
       
       
      ........Continue in Part 2
    • By seppo
      Hello,
      this is my first post. Please no bully. :3
       
      Panzerkampfwagen 2000
      In 1988 Germany developed a concept for a tank with two crew men. In order to test whether it's possible for only two crew men to operate a tank effectively, a Leopard 1 and a Leopard 2 were modified. 


      Field trials were held in 1990 and subsequently it was concluded to be a viable concept in 1992. The project was however canceled, because the downfall of the Soviet Union meant, that a new battle tank was no longer needed. Furthermore Israel stealing submarines and reunification meant that the budget was not sufficient either.
       
      Neue Gepanzerte Plattform
      In 1995 a concept for a whole family of armored vehicles(SPAAG, MBT, IFV) was developed, where the MBT would be manned by two man, just like the Panzerkampfwagen 2000. A prototype was build and tested in 1997. However a further budget cut lead to the cancellation in 1998. Wegmann desgin: Turret + autoloader:
      http://www.patent-de.com/pdf/DE19644524A1.pdf
      Diehl developed an APS for this tank: AWiSS


      EGS:
      Hull length = 8,67m
      Full width = 3,98m
      Width between the tracks = 3,5m
      Height = 2,71m
      The intended combat weight for the complete tank was between 55t and 77t.
      Can anyone calculate the the cross section areas and the protection levels for the front and the side, assuming mid-90s filler materials were used?
       
      Thanks for your attention!
    • By Tied
      Yes
       
      i personally support it, by finding the KGB Felix Dzerzhinsky greatly improved state scurrility both inside the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics and abroad (their jurisdiction was only domestic, but they kept the internationally influential people safe at night)   a dedicated defender of both the Revolution and all the Soviet peoples     what do you think of this news?

×
×
  • Create New...