Jump to content
Please support this forum by joining the SH Patreon ×
Sturgeon's House

The Small Arms Thread, Part 8: 2018; ICSR to be replaced by US Army with interim 15mm Revolver Cannon.


Khand-e

Recommended Posts

https://www.kalashnikov.ru/v-poiskah-balansa-2/

   Kalashnikov's SR1 is kind of bad. Problems with controls, ergonomics, magwell and so on. Low quality of some smaller details also noted. Failures to feed, impossible to press some buttons, it even managed to damage one of mags. Those and other problems are making SR1 questinable weapon at best.

 

web_sr1_00003.jpg

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, LoooSeR said:

https://www.kalashnikov.ru/v-poiskah-balansa-2/

   Kalashnikov's SR1 is kind of bad. Problems with controls, ergonomics, magwell and so on. Low quality of some smaller details also noted. Failures to feed, impossible to press some buttons, it even managed to damage one of mags. Those and other problems are making SR1 questinable weapon at best.

 

web_sr1_00003.jpg

 

 

 

 

Lol.

 

My Saiga .223 with an AR-15 magwell adapter is better than that thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ewww 7.62x39 AND shelf mod... Really?

 

Also, way to make the magwell as derpy as possible!!! 

 

I mean, I guess they could have went with the PWS long stroke piston and a bona fide m16a2 fcg for the 9 different trigger pulls all of which suck to truly cap off the derp but God damnit!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/24/2018 at 6:15 PM, Oedipus Wreckx-n-Effect said:

 

Lol.

 

My Saiga .223 with an AR-15 magwell adapter is better than that thing.

 

What really gets me is how similar their production SR1 configuration really is to the Canis Design Group m4 to AK one piece conversion assembly through the stock interface, grip, and magwell right down to the rounded nub forward of the well.

 

Edit: Yeah I know there's only so many possible and somewhat economical to manufacture ways to do such an assembly, but it's still pretty disturbingly close.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Willy Brandt said:

Got to handle the MG 3. Boi RIP my shoulder.
It really lets you know its age.

You really gotta manhandle it.

And what are those ergonomics everyone is talking about?
You want to shoot it in any other position than prone? Oh my bad not possible.

Night sights what are those?
If its dark you stop shooting.

What? You want to conceal your position?
Never heard about this "Flash hider" thingy.

Really cant wait to handle the MG5 or MG4.
 

 

 

 

I don't have an MG-3, but I do have most of an MG-42 nearby for study.

I do wonder whether adding a flash hider would affect rate of fire.  Presumably any sort of flash hider would also have to double as a booster.  I think I vaguely recall reading about the Nazis looking at adding a suppressor.  But since the suppressor would be fixed to the gun and not cool off during barrel changes, it would have to be a very tough suppressor indeed.

Do MG-4 and MG-5 have provisions for single shots?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...