Jump to content
Sturgeon's House

The Small Arms Thread, Part 8: 2018; ICSR to be replaced by US Army with interim 15mm Revolver Cannon.


Recommended Posts

4 hours ago, Sten said:

Let's see what legal sheenanigans will happen next.

 

The legal shenanigans have already started. Apparently C.G. Haenel has only nine employees located at its official company headquarters. At some point there were only four.

 

The direct owner of C.G. Haenel, the Merkel Group (which is also a German company) has somewhere between 100 and 150 employees. Apparently most of their products are made outside of Germany as part of Caracal International.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 10.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Let's all take a trip back to the late 1970s and early 1980s.  This was the time of punk.  This was the time of despair.   Punk was all about minimalism; strip everything down to a few chords, wear

Stechkin's Abakan (TKB-0146). https://www.kalashnikov.ru/abakan-stechkina-avtomat-stechkina-tkb-0146/        Bullpup, system of "recoil impulse shifted in time", 2-stage

So what, my 5.56 rounds are groundbreaking too if I shoot the dirt.

Yeah... at a first glance it doesn't look good. I still wonder what kind of freestyle accounting is going on at Haenel for an AR style gun being cheaper than a gun with an extruded upper and injection molded plastic lower. Albeit that is only part of the equation for a contract like this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

   Pics from Army 2020 by Vitaliy Kyzmin

 

   RPL-20 LMG in 5.45x39

i-JFq-W2-Rk-XL

 

Spoiler

i-gj-TZCw-F-XL

 

i-f-Sb-DT6-N-XL

 

i-mpd-BZr2-XL

 

   MPL-1

i-XB7pc4c-XL

 

Spoiler

i-JZqknbs-XL

 

i-q-Rx-Fz-Gb-XL

 

   MPL

i-g-XRxk-Qv-XL

 

Spoiler

i-GZBGg-QB-XL

 

   PLK

i-Z6fqrp-K-XL

 

Spoiler

i-Lx8-CC7j-XL

 

   6P68 A-762 assault rifle in 7.62x39

i-t-Xh-Pstm-XL

 

Spoiler

i-r-ZJ3-P6h-XL

 

i-DXh-CBDT-XL

 

i-Rk7-Lb-S7-XL

 

   6P67 in 5.45x39

i-VKSHJp3-XL

 

Spoiler

i-qv-BBGTd-XL

 

i-9v-Ln6s-M-XL

 

   6P72 Udav 9x21

i-t-Cxj7r-N-XL

 

   RG120-1 Aspid in 9x19

Spoiler

i-22-Wp-Xm-Z-XL

 

   RG120-2 Poloz in 9x19

Spoiler

i-Jvfzvj-F-XL

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
On 8/7/2015 at 11:36 PM, Sturgeon said:

Also, Alex, this came up elsehwere and I thought I'd share it here so you can tell me how I mis-remembered the whole event/am wrong/etc:
 

BabyOlifant, on 07 August 2015 - 04:00 PM, said:


8. Equally strange - why would I include a rocket engine so good that not only did the Americans straight-up copy it and set up their own production lines for it, but initially even the metallurgy was totally beyond Western science? It is a mystery.

 

Is this the RD-180?

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

19 minutes ago, Pascal said:

 

Is this the RD-180?

 

Just now, Sturgeon said:

 

Yes.

 

One of the Big Oofs on the russian side, they sold those engines at prices lower then their production costs and the production costs don't even include the money spent on the R&D on those engines, hella cost on those engines to produce.

Link to post
Share on other sites
On 10/10/2020 at 3:36 PM, Sturgeon said:

 

Whoah what who told you that?

Nobody in particular, just a discussion on that topic.

 

A quote from that discussion would have done more justice.

"First successful and popularized the massive bolt group with gas piston"

Link to post
Share on other sites
14 hours ago, Pascal said:

Nobody in particular, just a discussion on that topic.

 

A quote from that discussion would have done more justice.

"First successful and popularized the massive bolt group with gas piston"


Oh, that's a really broad criteria, but yeah it might be. 1893 is extremely early for a fixed piston design.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Similar Content

    • By LostCosmonaut
      There are many who feel that the 5.56 NATO is a superlative rifle round. Much has been said about larger alternatives to 5.56, such as various 6.5mm and 6.8mm rounds among others. Less has been said about smaller rounds. Off the top of my head, I can recall that there was a German 4.6x36mm round, used in the HK36, and the British 4.85x49mm round. Neither of these rounds managed to gain widespread acceptance. My knowledge of the voodoo that is ballistics is somewhat limited, so I'm uncertain as to whether these failures were caused by flaws with the rounds themselves, or because they were below some lower limit of effective bullet size, beyond which performance decreases rapidly. Could we see a resurgence of these concepts in the future, or do they represent an evolutionary dead-end?

×
×
  • Create New...