Jump to content
Sturgeon's House
T___A

Post Election Thread: Democracy Dies In Darkness And You Can Help

Recommended Posts

Holy shit.

http://www.politico.com/story/2016/11/hillary-clinton-aides-loss-blame-231215

Not only is it clear they've learned nothing:

Bill fucking Clinton warned them and they didn't listen.

The sense inside Clinton headquarters on Thursday, as aides packed up their desks and munched on free tacos and brownies, was that the Democratic nominee did not deserve to lose to a man that only 30 percent of the country thought was qualified to be president and that it ultimately came down to white working class voters rejecting her because she was a woman.

This seems like a common response, refuse to look in a mirror and simply scream racist/sexist.

I didn't vote against her because she was a woman, I voted against her because she is blindingly corrupt.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This seems like a common response, refuse to look in a mirror and simply scream racist/sexist.

I didn't vote against her because she was a woman, I voted against her because she is blindingly corrupt.

Yep. I'm seeing a lot of the same thing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The basic thing my friends said is that the Democrats basically paid too much attention to Hispanics to the detriment of the white working class, which was a traditional Democrat base. The problem with that strategy is that Hispanics are not very reliable voters, and it cost them in this election.

They are hopeful for a purge in the DNC, but that remains to be seen, They appear to still be in shock.

 

I'm a little skeptical that "Hispanic" is a useful label for any sort of electioneering/sociological study.  When people talk about the "Hispanic vote," they are implicitly saying that first-generation agricultural workers whose families are still in their country of origin have essentially the same economic and political outloook as moneyed aristocracy from New Mexico who have been there since before the United States formed.  It doesn't pass the smell test.

 

You rarely hear about a "White" vote.  This is because the people who come up with the demographic divisions are themselves White (or have spent so much time in higher educational institutions that they might as well be) and understand the rich and subtle diversity of White people.

 

Well, sure, the rights of the minority should be protected from the tyranny of the majority, but that's also different from the minority being allowed to dictate the majority? I mean, this is why we dispensed with aristocracies and absolute monarchies too, right?

 

Point of order, "we," by which I mean the collective Anglosphere, never dispensed with absolute monarchies because "we" never had one.

 

 

It seems politically incorrect now to call a human being 3/5s of a person. But this was a GOOD thing at the time of our founding since it meant the Slave states couldn't artificially stack political representation on account of human chattel. 

 

Good point; if slaves had been counted as whole people it would just have helped the slave owners.

 

Holy shit.

 

http://www.politico.com/story/2016/11/hillary-clinton-aides-loss-blame-231215

 

Not only is it clear they've learned nothing:

 

 

Bill fucking Clinton warned them and they didn't listen.

 

If the experience of the 1968 election is anything to go by, these sorts of re-alignments are a one-way street.  Bill Clinton will get to say "I fucking told you so" until he dies.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is from wikileaks, so it might have been pulled wholesale from Julian Assange's malformed asshole.

 

But assuming it's true, this could be the biggest political fuckup in US history; https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/796222841612042240

 

Pretty sure it's true. I'm think I posted that in the elections thread.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This article is getting attention again:

https://theintercept.com/2016/06/25/brexit-is-only-the-latest-proof-of-the-insularity-and-failure-of-western-establishment-institutions/

Unfortunately; if you agree that its hypothesis is essentially correct, then all we can expect for the forseeable is an establishment determined to block all reform - good and bad.

 

It's a pretty good article, but it misses an important point that I think undermines your conclusion.

 

People don't lash out and attack when they feel threatened and oppressed.  People lash out and attack when they feel threatened and oppressed and they think they can reasonably achieve victory.  This election didn't just show that the establishment is corrupt, but also that it is brittle.  That's why I think Brexit was a huge boost for Trump; it showed that the polls could be wrong, and that the conventional wisdom could be overcome.

 

Cynically, I think that Trump won't follow through on most of his promises because most presidents have not.  But maybe this situation is exceptional.  Trump and his supporters both smell blood in the water.  Once he was elected, did his opponents have some masterful counterstroke to tie his hands?  No.  They cried instead.

 

"Cried," as in they actually shed tears of unironic despair and wailed and pounded the unforgiving ground with their palms and probably brought out those crazy blade-on-chain thingies that Shiites beat themselves with during Ashura.  This tells me two critical things:

 

1)  Trump's opponents were so confident of victory that they did see loss as a contingency they would need to prepare for.

 

2)  They did not prepare for loss.

 

That's just more blood in the water!  It favors Trump to attack now, and keep attacking while his opponents are still on leave from their senses.  It would make little difference if the establishment tries to block Trump from achieving any of his reforms (a couple of which are extremely good ideas and desperately need to happen) if he can methodically destroy them.  A good start would be something like putting Eric Holder's head on a pike, and then beating a list of his professional friends and allies out of him, and then putting all of those peoples' heads on pikes as well.  This would be dressed up as cleaning up corruption when in reality it would be a cynical, calculated purge of opponents, but when their misdeeds were brought to air I really doubt too many people could bring themselves to oppose such a move.  I'm not sure I would.  Sure, the establishment outnumbers Trump's people.  The French Army outnumbered the Wehrmacht in 1940 too.

 

In summary, it's not just that the establishment became disconnected, it's that it also became weak and stupid.  Or to put it another way, Alan Sokal's little project to save the Left from a trendy segment of itself failed, and this is the price.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I journeyed into the WoT T110 Herpes thread for the first time in close to a month to finally see what their reaction was...and... well... it was not even entertaining.

 

The usual animea Princesses are triggered. And it is somewhat comical to see "The Sledgehammer" acting like an unlikable git and being smacked over the nose like an ill-trained poodle. I mean yeah. Even the T110 thread is already tired of ol' Sledgehammer. And throughout it that Rita chick is still doing her "I'm-a-girl-watch-me-do-girl-things-boys-LOL" schtick. 

 

0/10. Won't go back for another month again.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Meanwhile, it is fun to watch the sudden secession movements that have cropped up for California (#CALEXIT) and Oregon/Washington (Republic of Cascadia Secession Movement).

 

http://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/opinion/the-conversation/sd-calexit-how-secession-could-work-in-california-20161110-htmlstory.html

 

http://www.oregonlive.com/politics/index.ssf/2016/11/after_trump_victory_oregonians.html

 

Of course it should be noted that in California, Oregon, and Washington, if you go 50 miles outside of the population centers of Seattle, Portland, San Francisco and L.A./San Diego, you'll find the rest of those states wanting to secede from them.

 

Of course I almost WANT a secessionist movement led by the Democratic Party again.

 

09986c41dde73570c523059e6bf0c2c4.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So why isn't the media or someone pointing out to the people freaking out over Trump, that much of his negatives were created by the DNC and Hillary's campaign, and that there isn't much real evidence he is anti black, gay LGBT, Mexican or jew and they were duped into thinking this by the most corrupt political machine since Nixon. I mean liberals are committing suicide over it for fuck sake, someone thing of the children.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So why isn't the media or someone point out to the people freaking out over Trump that much of his negatives were created by the dnc and Hillarys campaign and that there isn't much real evidence he is anti bkack, gay LGBTQ, Mexican or jews and they were duped into thinking this by the most current political machine since nixon. I mean liberals are committin suicide over it for fuck sake

Because the media was backing the DNC and Hillary

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

...Seriously? Bernie 2020? These guys know how old Sanders is, right?

 

Also, the Republicans also vowed to kick Barack out in 2012, it didn't happen. Trump is going to be here for 8 years (unless he chooses not to run), people should get used to that or there will be more crying in 2020.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This seems like a common response, refuse to look in a mirror and simply scream racist/sexist.

Yep. I'm seeing a lot of the same thing.

Here's how Johnathan Pie lays it on the table

 

Favorite part: "...and if my mansplaining is triggering you, then you can either fuck off to your safe space, or you can engage and debate me and tell me what I'm getting wrong..."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • Similar Content

    • By T___A
      Reposting for those that didn't see it the first time around:

       
      https://www.theepochtimes.com/spygate-the-true-story-of-collusion_2684629.html
    • By Tied
      Yes
       
      i personally support it, by finding the KGB Felix Dzerzhinsky greatly improved state scurrility both inside the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics and abroad (their jurisdiction was only domestic, but they kept the internationally influential people safe at night)   a dedicated defender of both the Revolution and all the Soviet peoples     what do you think of this news?
    • By Xoon
      Colonization Of The Solar System

       
      This thread is for discussing the colonization of the solar system, mainly focusing on Mars and the Moon since they are the most relevant. 
      Main topics include transportation, industry, agriculture, economics, civil engineering,  energy production and distribution, habitation, ethics and politics. 
       
       
       
       
      First order of business, our glories tech messiah Elon Musk has set his eyes on Mars:
      Reason stated? Because being a interplanetary species beats being a single planetary species. 
       
      How does he plan to do this?
      By sending two cargo ships by 2022 to Mars for surveying and building  basic infrastructure, then two years later in 2024 sending 4 ships, two cargo ships and two crewed ships to start the colonization. First thing would be to build fuel refineries and expanding infrastructure to support more ships, then starting to mine and build industry. 
       
      This could mark a new era in human history, a second colonization era, this time without the genocides. The economic potentials are incredible, a single asteroid could easily support the entire earths gold, silver and platinum production for a decade. The moon holds a lot of valuable Helium 3, which right now is worth 12 000 dollars per kilogram! Helium is a excellent material for nuclear reactors. 
       
       
       

       
       
      Speaking about the moon, several companies have set their eyes on the moon, and for good reason.
      In my opinion,  the moon has the possibility of becoming a mayor trade hub for the solar system.  Why is this? Simply put, the earth has a few pesky things called gravity, atmosphere and environmentalists. This makes launching rockets off the moon much cheaper. The moon could even have a space elevator with current technology!  If we consider Elon Musk's plan to travel to Mars, then the Moon should be able to supply cheaper fuel and spaceship parts to space, to then be sent to Mars. The Moon is also rich in minerals that have not sunk to the core yet, and also has a huge amount of rare earth metals, which demands are rapidly increasing. Simply put, the Moon would end up as a large exporter to both the earth and potentially Mars. Importing from earth would almost always be more expensive compared to a industrialized Moon. 
       
      Now how would we go about colonizing the moon? Honestly, in concept it is quite simple.When considering locations, the South pole seems like the best candidate. This is because of it's constant sun spots, which could give 24 hour solar power to the colony and give constant sunlight to plants without huge power usage. The south pole also contain dark spots which contains large amount of frozen water, which would be used to sustain the agriculture and to make rocket fuel. It is true that the equator has the largest amounts of Helium 3 and the best location for rocket launches. However, with the lack of constant sunlight and frequent solar winds and meteor impacts, makes to unsuited for initial colonization. If the SpaceX's BFR successes, then it would be the main means of transporting materials to the moon until infrastructure is properly developed. Later a heavy lifter would replace it when transporting goods to and from the lunar surface, and specialized cargo ship for trans portion between the Moon, Earth and Mars. A space elevator would reduce prices further in the future.  Most likely, a trade station would be set up in CIS lunar space and Earth orbit which would house large fuel tanks and be able to hold the cargo from  cargo ships and heavy lifters. Sun ports would be designated depending on their amount of sunlight. Year around sunlight spots would be dedicated to solar panels and agriculture. Varying sun spots would be used for storage, landing pads and in general everything. Dark spots would be designated to mining to extract its valuable water. Power production would be inistially almost purely solar, with some back up and smoothing out generators. Later nuclear reactors would take over, but serve as a secondary backup energy source. 
       
       
      The plan:
      If we can assume the BFR is a success, then we have roughly 150 ton of payload to work with per spaceship. The first spaceship would contain a satellite to survey colonization spot. Everything would be robotic at first. Several robots capable of building a LZ for future ships,  mining of the lunar surface for making solar panels for energy production, then mining and refinement for fuel for future expeditions. The lunar colony would be based underground, room and pillar mining would be used to cheaply create room that is also shielded from radiation and surface hazards. Copying the mighty tech priest, a second ship would come with people and more equipment. With this more large scale mining and ore refinement would be started. Eventually beginning to manufacturing their own goods. Routinely BFRs would supply the colony with special equipment like electronics, special minerals and advanced equipment and food until the agricultural sector can support the colony.  The colony would start to export Helium 3 and rocket fuel, as well as spacecraft parts and scientific materials. Eventually becoming self sustaining, it would stop importing food and equipment, manufacturing it all themselves to save costs. 
       
      I am not the best in agriculture, so if some knowledge people could teach us here about closed loop farming, or some way of cultivating the lunar soil. Feel free to do so.
       
       
      Mining:
      I found a article here about the composition of the lunar soil and the use for it's main components:

      In short, the moon has large amounts of oxygen, silicon, aluminum, calcium, iron, magnesium and titanium in it's soil.
      How do we refine them? By doing this.
       
      Aluminum could be used for most kinds of wiring to requiring high conductivity to density ratio. Meaning power lines, building cables and such. Aluminum is not very suited for building structures on the surface because of the varying temperatures causing it to expand and contract. Iron or steel is better suited here. Aluminum could however be used in underground structures where temperatures are more stable.  Aluminum would also most likely end up as the main lunar rocket fuel. Yes, aluminum as rocket fuel. Just look at things like ALICE, or Aluminum-oxygen. Aluminum-oxygen would probably win out since ALICE uses water, which would be prioritized for the BFRs, since I am pretty sure they are not multi-fuel. 
       More on aluminum rocket fuel here:
      https://forum.kerbalspaceprogram.com/index.php?/topic/88130-aluminum-as-rocket-fuel/&
      http://www.projectrho.com/public_html/rocket/realdesigns2.php#umlunar
      https://blogs.nasa.gov/Rocketology/2016/04/15/weve-got-rocket-chemistry-part-1/
      https://blogs.nasa.gov/Rocketology/2016/04/21/weve-got-rocket-chemistry-part-2/
       
      Believe it or not, but calcium is actually a excellent conductor, about 12% better than copper. So why do we not use it on earth? Because it has a tendency to spontaneously combust in the atmosphere. In a vacuum however, this does not pose a problem. I does however need to be coated in a material so it does not deteriorate. This makes it suited for "outdoor" products and compact electrical systems like electric motors. Yes, a calcium electric motor.  
       
       
      Lastly, a few articles about colonizing the moon:
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colonization_of_the_Moon
      https://www.sciencealert.com/nasa-scientists-say-we-could-colonise-the-moon-by-2022-for-just-10-billion
      https://www.nasa.gov/audience/foreducators/topnav/materials/listbytype/HEP_Lunar.html
       
      NASA article about production of solar panels on the moon:
      https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/20050110155.pdf
       
      Map over the south pole:
      http://lroc.sese.asu.edu/images/gigapan
       
       
      Feel free to spam the thread with news regarding colonization. 
       
       
×