Jump to content
Sturgeon's House
Tied

United States Military Vehicle General: Guns, G*vins, and Gas Turbines

Recommended Posts

On 10/22/2018 at 6:30 PM, Ramlaen said:

 

Optionally manned + no basket.

We can add :

Compatible with larger caliber than 30mm, 

- Big elevation too : 60deg. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

8 hours ago, Mighty_Zuk said:

Turret seems to already integrate every major aspect of what the US Army wanted from it (50mm gun, very high elevation, APS).

This turret was made by the US-Army. 

8 hours ago, Mighty_Zuk said:

The 35mm system the CV90 and Lynx could take is also compatible with the 50mm gun and ammo, but if they want to impress, they have to show it in real life, not just say they can do it.

The real difficulty is the US-Army seems to call for a « never seen before » elevation. 

 

Just to remind :

BAE’s got another turret available for the CV90 :

Combat-Vehicle-90-Mk3-FRES.jpg

Of course, this is a 40CTA, but, maybe the US wanted 50mm can be integrated. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
37 minutes ago, Serge said:

 

This turret was made by the US-Army. 

The real difficulty is the US-Army seems to call for a « never seen before » elevation. 

 

 

How do you know the turret is made by the US Army? I try to read every message in this thread but I seem to have missed this.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Mighty_Zuk said:

 

How do you know the turret is made by the US Army? I try to read every message in this thread but I seem to have missed this.

Made by ARDEC. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Mighty_Zuk said:

 

How do you know the turret is made by the US Army? I try to read every message in this thread but I seem to have missed this.

 

The following video has the GDLS rep clearly stating that the turret is designed by GD (1:21 mark). The 50mm gun, OTOH, is being integrated with ARDEC's help (1:13 mark) and the 85° elevation capability is their answer to a request/requirement by USAR.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

And here :



The nearly 40 ton Griffin III features a remotely-operated turret the U.S. Army’s own Armament Research, Development and Engineering Center (ARDEC) developed, which is armed with a 50mm cannon from Orbital ATK, now part of Northrop Grumman. This weapon is substantially larger than the 25mm M242 Bushmaster cannon on the Bradley Fighting Vehicle.

[...]

The Army has also developed the turret with modularity in mind, which could allow the service to install smaller guns in a portion of the fleet depending on the intended role. Not surprisingly, it can already accommodate the 30mm XM813 cannon found on the service’s up-gunned Stryker Dragoon wheeled armored vehicles.

 

http://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/24114/one-of-these-big-cannon-toting-armored-vehicles-may-replace-the-bradley-fighting-vehicle

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21 hours ago, Serge said:

BAE’s got another turret available for the CV90 :

Combat-Vehicle-90-Mk3-FRES.jpg

Of course, this is a 40CTA, but, maybe the US wanted 50mm can be integrated. 


MTIP 2 (Manned Turret Integration Programme)
Created by BAE for Uk's WCSP and FRES SV. I doubt there's been any work on it since 2010.

pWamnfy.jpg
a8a4sDi.jpg
swb6FJq.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Mike Sparks argument #225: the all-purpose Gavin will keep your children safe and deliver them to school when school bus drivers are on strike and courting the devils of socialism. Stupid Abrams can't even do that. #back2gavin #whatwouldjesusdrive

 

Yes, I know it's a M59 and not a M113. Just let me fill my daily quota of cringey attempts at humor.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That's a possibility, though that hulk is lacking the two "grooves" on the turret cheeks. Also, I don't think they ever put that M60 cupola on the AX's commander hatch.

 

Vs6K1bR.png

 

9lJ90vE.jpg

 

Additionally, the back face of the turret on the hulk is canted, whereas the back of the AX' turret seems flat. If anything, the hulk's turret has more of an early M1 turret vibe (with the short storage boxes on the sides and a pedestal for the wind sensor on the back) than an AX... It could however be some intermediary step between the two, a precursor to the M60-2000.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, Renegade334 said:

Credits owed to Damian90 on the AW forums. Since there is some uncertainty as to what this truly is, I haven't posted it in the vismods thread (yet).

 

it's posted by Jon Bernstein

 

45557994_10156066522491242_5615399242479

45565123_10156066522641242_6142769128475

 

Armor Modeling and Preservation Society Social Group on FB

 

Quote

Two similar, but ultimately different projects. The M60-2000 used a modified M60 turret, which I was inside when I took these photos as part of my job. The 120S mounted an M1A1 Abrams turret on an M60 hull. Similar concepts, different execution.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A pic of it appeared on the WoT forums a while ago and we could never figure out what it was.  Nice to know now.

 

Are there any historical pictures of the M60-2000?  All image search results I get for it bring up the M60-120s.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No, most image queries will be polluted with well-known pictures of the 120S (many of those pics will be screenshots from Armored Warfare; the devs have erroneously used the 120S pics to model their premium "M60-2000"), the Super M60/M60AX, the Magach and/or the Sabra.

 

EDIT - an interesting detail: another AW forum member, Jarink, suggested the vehicle seen in the background here could possibly be a M1015 Electronic Warfare Shelter Center (based on the M548 chassis) due to the presence of a grounding rod on the front.

 

kBlf0Wo.jpg

 

uSqP2gw.jpg

^--- M1015 with ELINT-gathering AN/MSQ-103 "TEAMPACK". Note the grounding rod at the front.

 

oLyLvZ3.jpg

^--- M1015 with AN/MLQ-34 "TACJAM" communications jammer. Note the more modern grounding rod with square box, similar to the one in the first picture.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Similar Content

    • By Mighty_Zuk
      I realized we don't have a topic for a proper discussion of what future AFVs should look like, in the style of a general AFVs discussion rather than country-specific threads.
       
      I spotted a revived potential need for future MBTs - a coaxial autocannon to replace the coaxial MG. The reason? An APS neutralizer. 
      Here's my short post on why I think it should happen:
       
      I didn't add it there, but I see lasers as a potential alternative. However, I don't think they're viable because of the power required to properly neutralize an APS's components, especially if these components are dispersed, or worse yet, effectively camouflaged. An autocannon will be able to disable not only the APS but other external components all at once. 
      Similar to the engagement method showcased by Russia where they fired 2 Kornet missiles (almost) simultaneously to defeat an APS, a hypothetical mode of operation could include firing a burst of 2 KETF shells at a target prior to firing a main gun shell.
       
      An additional alternative could be to use a single main gun ABM shell that would initiate outside the scope of the APS's engagement range (e.g engagement range is 30m so it initiates at 50m), but it would have 2 main issues that are a longer time to kill a target and a greater consumption of ammunition (up to a 3rd of ammo would have to be allocated to ABM munitions strictly for anti-armor operations).
    • By Sturgeon
      I'll start off with a couple Pathe videos:


       

       

       

    • By EnsignExpendable
      Volketten on the WoT forums posted some XM-1 trials results.
       
       
      Compare this to what the Americans claimed the XM1 will do:
       

       
      Seems like the XM1 really didn't earn that checkmark-plus in mobility or protection. 
       
    • By JNT11593
      So National Geographic has a mini series airing right now called The Long Road Home. I'm curious if any else is watching it right now. The show is about black Friday, and the beginning of the siege of sadr city in 2004. It's filmed at Fort Hood with cooperation from the U.S. Army so it features a lot of authentic armor. The first couple of episodes feature Bradleys quite heavily, and starting with episode 4 it looks like Abrams starting getting more screen time. It's pretty cool if you want to see some authentic tanks and vehicles as long as you can stand some cheesiness and army wife shit.
       
      Edit: Just realized I posted to the wrong board.
       
×