Jump to content
Sturgeon's House
Tied

United States Military Vehicle General: Guns, G*vins, and Gas Turbines

Recommended Posts

6 hours ago, Ramlaen said:

M1A2C, note the 81 weight mark on the hull.

 

Are there anyone who knows what this means?

Exact weight or weight group designation?

UPD: It seems like it's really an indication of weight. 
rWEfU7mnhzg.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This sign indicates the Military Load Classification. Leopard 2A7  is ranked with 70. This doesn't have mean that they weight that much (real weight might be around ~66t) but a bridge that such a vehicle needs to cross needs to be built up for the number of tons that is written on the sign.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, Rico said:

This doesn't have mean that they weight that much (real weight might be around ~66t) but a bridge that such a vehicle needs to cross needs to be built up for the number of tons that is written on the sign.

 

If M1A2C would weight 66 t then it will probably receive sign with No. 73 or 75 because 66 t = 73 short tons.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A US short ton is 2,000 pounds, which equals 907kg (~0.907 tonnes). I’m using the Australian military convention on tonnes to differentiate metric from non-metric units of measure, noting that a metric tonne isn’t a SI unit for 1,000kg. 

 

MLC 70 equates to 70 US short tons. 

70*0.907 = 63,490 kg = 63.5 tonnes.

 

MLC 81 = 73.47 tonnes. 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Some shots and footage of the Americans in Wartime Museum's EFV automotive test rig:

 

img%5D

 

fahTJIq.jpg

 

The water jets, etc. are replicas, presumably since this was an automotive test rig.

img%5D

 

The rear door was open this year; interior is likewise non-functional from a troop-carrying persepctive.

BgxFoMF.jpg

 

RkBZFIb.jpg

 

rfz9dgq.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

current plan is

-to upgrade 6 SBCT to DVH (currently 3) and then decide whether to upgrade the remaining 3

-modernize the ATGM Stryker to catch it up with TOW equipment in ABCT and IBCT

-upgrade the CROWS in all 9 SBCT to CROWS-J

-equip 3 more SBCT with 30mm guns (making 4) and then decide whether to upgrade the remaining 5

-a mobile howitzer for the SBCT

Edited by Ramlaen

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
43 minutes ago, Ramlaen said:

-equip all 9 SBCT with CROWS-J

-equip 3 more SBCT with 30mm guns (making 4) and then decide whether to upgrade the remaining 5

Does this mean Stryker Dragoons will have *both* CROWS-J and 30mm guns, or just non-30mm variants in the same SBCT will get the -J?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
47 minutes ago, N-L-M said:

Does this mean Stryker Dragoons will have *both* CROWS-J and 30mm guns, or just non-30mm variants in the same SBCT will get the -J?

 

Non 30mm variants will get the CROWS-J.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 7/13/2019 at 2:33 PM, Ramlaen said:

 

Leonardo DRS's RIwP turret with an XM813, M240, Javelin and IBAS sight

 

qZtTitI.jpg

 

WFv8trh.jpg

 

I still suspect this turret will be chosen for the DVHA1 Strykers getting a 30mm gun considering the Army already chose it for the IM-SHORAD.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, DogDodger said:

Is this what you're talking about? Not 100% legible but I think it's the closest I have. Taken at the Memorial Day event at Ft. Knox on 26 May 2007. Link to original: click

  Hide contents

QPkQaBA.jpg

  Reveal hidden contents

 

Yes thank you! The side skirts on the M1A2 SEPv2 here at USMA intrigued me as the serial number begins with a U, wondering if this means anything. I though if older sideskirts lacked this U it might shown an update in the composite maybe, similar to turret serial number.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
46 minutes ago, Jackvony said:

Yes thank you! The side skirts on the M1A2 SEPv2 here at USMA intrigued me as the serial number begins with a U, wondering if this means anything. I though if older sideskirts lacked this U it might shown an update in the composite maybe, similar to turret serial number.

 

IIRC, (Damian stated) that the U in a vehicles serial number indicated that it uses first or second generation DU inserts, or something along those lines. The source is questionable (I mean, Damian is fucking crazy), but seems logical. My memory is also a little hazy on the subject. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Similar Content

    • By Mighty_Zuk
      I realized we don't have a topic for a proper discussion of what future AFVs should look like, in the style of a general AFVs discussion rather than country-specific threads.
       
      I spotted a revived potential need for future MBTs - a coaxial autocannon to replace the coaxial MG. The reason? An APS neutralizer. 
      Here's my short post on why I think it should happen:
       
      I didn't add it there, but I see lasers as a potential alternative. However, I don't think they're viable because of the power required to properly neutralize an APS's components, especially if these components are dispersed, or worse yet, effectively camouflaged. An autocannon will be able to disable not only the APS but other external components all at once. 
      Similar to the engagement method showcased by Russia where they fired 2 Kornet missiles (almost) simultaneously to defeat an APS, a hypothetical mode of operation could include firing a burst of 2 KETF shells at a target prior to firing a main gun shell.
       
      An additional alternative could be to use a single main gun ABM shell that would initiate outside the scope of the APS's engagement range (e.g engagement range is 30m so it initiates at 50m), but it would have 2 main issues that are a longer time to kill a target and a greater consumption of ammunition (up to a 3rd of ammo would have to be allocated to ABM munitions strictly for anti-armor operations).
    • By Sturgeon
      I'll start off with a couple Pathe videos:


       

       

       

    • By EnsignExpendable
      Volketten on the WoT forums posted some XM-1 trials results.
       
       
      Compare this to what the Americans claimed the XM1 will do:
       

       
      Seems like the XM1 really didn't earn that checkmark-plus in mobility or protection. 
       
    • By JNT11593
      So National Geographic has a mini series airing right now called The Long Road Home. I'm curious if any else is watching it right now. The show is about black Friday, and the beginning of the siege of sadr city in 2004. It's filmed at Fort Hood with cooperation from the U.S. Army so it features a lot of authentic armor. The first couple of episodes feature Bradleys quite heavily, and starting with episode 4 it looks like Abrams starting getting more screen time. It's pretty cool if you want to see some authentic tanks and vehicles as long as you can stand some cheesiness and army wife shit.
       
      Edit: Just realized I posted to the wrong board.
       
×
×
  • Create New...