Jump to content
Please support this forum by joining the SH Patreon ×
Sturgeon's House

United States Military Vehicle General: Guns, G*vins, and Gas Turbines


Tied

Recommended Posts

15 minutes ago, JNT11593 said:

So this is pretty random thought I had. Do Stryker A1s actually have a numeric designation? Because I'm curious if it'd be M1126A1, M1256A1, or M1296A1? Or are they just sticking to XXXX-A1?

 

Should be M1256A1 for the standard infantry carrier.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/13/2020 at 5:33 PM, Ramlaen said:

https://breakingdefense.com/2020/04/army-revamps-omfv-bradley-replacement-for-russian-front/

 

The revised requirement priority for the Bradley replacement / OMFV. Turreted Namer I choose you!

 

Rgikb6d.png

 

 

It reminds me this :

1. Extreme mobility
2. Anti-armor capability
3. Anti-aircraft capability
4. Survivability and protection
5. Strategic mobility
6. Easy maintenance
7. Development potential

The CV90 priorities. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/12/2020 at 3:05 PM, Karamazov said:

What is you mean? False information or test specifics?

During this period, the Leclerc MBT was not mature enough. 

But, French engineers who followed the Swedish tests came to the conclusion they were unfair. 

Swedish army tried to « destroyed » the tank. 

When you look at the mobility results, it’s tricky. It’s not possible to argue the Leopard’s got a good mobility. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This time around, “the Army is not requiring any bid samples prior to contract award,” yesterday’s release makes clear. “The Army is still drafting the M&S [Modeling & Simulation] test plan which may require vendors to build early surrogate platforms” (emphasis ours), but any “surrogate” will be only “a low-level mockup (e.g., digital, wood, etc.),” not anything nearly as expensive as an actual drivable vehicle.

 

 

Sheeesh, paper tigers

There should be enough mostly real, very current options available now to test, (and americanise) including

Namer

Redback

Lynx

 

All of these probably have significant surviveability vs other IFVs and infantry.  And are either real, demonstrable or approaching demonstration

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
5 hours ago, Ramlaen said:


*same turret as the first 81 x Stryker Dragoons.
 

The US Army completion for fitting a 30mm turret to its DVH Strykers is ongoing, with MOOG, EOS, Kongsberg, & Cockerill. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, 2805662 said:


*same turret as the first 81 x Stryker Dragoons.
 

The US Army completion for fitting a 30mm turret to its DVH Strykers is ongoing, with MOOG, EOS, Kongsberg, & Cockerill. 

 

I mean if we want to split hairs it could very well be the A1 turret or another variant altogether, it will need to handle salt water after all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/10/2020 at 5:00 PM, Karamazov said:

Does anyone have more or less reliable information on the cruising range of the M1A2 tanks?
This became interesting against the background of unverified information that in Iraq they were refueled every 150km.
Black Knight' troops deliver accuracy on range | Tanks mane… | Flickr

 

It refers to M1 Abrams, but it's interesting nonetheless.

Spoiler

1CGwLuZ.png

Spoiler

3JflU5d.png

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, 2805662 said:

Force protection kit could include any combination of ECM (Duke, etc.), APS, belly armour, plus TUSK 1 & TUSK 2, most likely. 

 

Given that the list includes FPK + APS, one can assume that the APS is not included in the FPK.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

https://www.marinecorpstimes.com/news/your-marine-corps/2020/05/15/acv-to-get-stryker-variant-of-30-mm-cannon/

Ashley M. Calingo, a spokeswoman with MARCORSYSCOM, told Marine Corps Times in an emailed statement that BAE — the manufacturer of the ACV — had selected a version of the Kongsberg medium caliber turret, or MCT-30, for a variant of the new amphib vehicle.


"BAE has also informed the Marine Corps that the MCT-30 version for the Marine Corps will be a lighter weight version of the Stryker system and use the Mk44 gun which is common with US Navy applications instead of the XM813 gun used on Stryker,” Calingo said.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...