Jump to content
Sturgeon's House

Recommended Posts

Why this is a seprate thread? Most of those guns a boring and nothing special. With small exception of SVCh and AMB rifles, Kalashnikov did not shown anything interesting or new.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, LoooSeR said:

Why this is a seprate thread? Most of those guns a boring and nothing special. With small exception of SVCh and AMB rifles, Kalashnikov did not shown anything interesting or new.

So the glory of Stalin Soviet Union Russia is easier to find?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, LoooSeR said:

Why this is a seprate thread? Most of those guns a boring and nothing special. With small exception of SVCh and AMB rifles, Kalashnikov did not shown anything interesting or new.

 

 

Yes; what is supposed to go in this thread, @Akula_941?  Is it supposed to be only new Russian stuff or what?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 8/23/2017 at 5:46 PM, Akula_941 said:

orig150348_2839913_27303861.jpg

Army2017

and here we go again, i kind start to hope this fake AK-12 just die completely for good

 

According to my sources it performs better than the "real" AK-12, while being cheaper. I agree it's disappointing visually though.

Also EOTech lol.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 2017/8/25 at 6:24 PM, Sturgeon said:

 

According to my sources it performs better than the "real" AK-12, while being cheaper. I agree it's disappointing visually though.

Also EOTech lol.

What kind of better performs? also does the new AK-12 cancel the burst firing mode entirely?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
54 minutes ago, Akula_941 said:

What kind of better performs? also does the new AK-12 cancel the burst firing mode entirely?

 

Burst fire was sort of a short-lived fad, and I don't think that any AKs were ever mass produced with burst limiters.  It was just something that was offered if it would help sales.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
30 minutes ago, Collimatrix said:

Burst fire was sort of a short-lived fad, and I don't think that any AKs were ever mass produced with burst limiters.  It was just something that was offered if it would help sales.

what about Bolt Catch? is the Bolt Catch mechanism from old AK-12 still available?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Collimatrix said:

 

Burst fire was sort of a short-lived fad, and I don't think that any AKs were ever mass produced with burst limiters.  It was just something that was offered if it would help sales.

 

AFAIK the AK-12/400 has a four position selector with a 2 round burst mode.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

OK, I'll give this thread a try:
 

 

 

So, here's what we know so far:

 

AM-17 and AMB-17 are supposed to be based on the old Dragunov MA design:
 

 

This design featured a steel "spine" that served as a contact point for the moving parts.  The weapon was made, otherwise, almost entirely of plastic.  This is a good design for cheap mass-manufacture, and should also eliminate some of the problems with other plastic receivers in rifles.  It is not clear if the AM-17 supersedes the reborn Dragunov MA that was first shown about a year ago:

9mHlx5W.png

 

SVCh is apparently also based (at least loosely) on the old Dragunov MA design, but it is apparently not the same thing as the SVK that was shown earlier (Max Popenker has also said this).

PL-15K looks like it might be striker-fired, and at least one brochure described the design as being optionally striker-fired.  The original PL-14 prototype was clearly hammer fired with an internal hammer:

0wrtkje.jpg

(#3 is the hammer)

The original arrangement, with the internal hammer, is better in my opinion than a Glock-style striker.  Strikers have two main advantages over hammers.  The first advantage is that they allow a lower bore axis.  The second advantage is that they are cheaper to make.  The PL-14 design solved the first problem, and the PL-14 clearly had a bore axis just as low as any striker-fired gun.  It seems unlikely that they were also able to make it just as cheap as a striker, but the price different is small in any case.

Hammers have a number of small advantages over strikers.  Hammers generally have greater spring energy and will reliably ignite ammunition with hard primers that strikers will not.  Additionally, Glock-style strikers are pushing against the frame in the opposite direction of the return spring when the slide is in battery.

 

MP-444 is described as striker-fired, but appears to have a hammer.  Did the rep mis-speak?  Otherwise, it looks very generic.  The big, square breech section of the barrel suggests that it is yet another tilting-barrel, short-recoil design that locks the slide and barrel together at the ejection port.

 

It appears that Kalashnikov Concern hired a product designer to improve the appearance of their products.  They do look much better now (the AM-17 in particular), but they also look very generic.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×