Jump to content
Sturgeon's House
Oedipus Wreckx-n-Effect

The UK Brave Space For Shitposting and Other Opinions Thread

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, Donward said:

74 years + 1 day after D-Day.

 

KFC to test Vegetarian fried chicken option in UK

 

https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/kfc-vegetarian-chicken-test-uk_us_5b195585e4b0957825a04540

 

This wouldn't have happened if we just let the Krauts have the place. 

"Vegetarian Fried Chicken"

 

-ERROR- FILE " LOGIC.EXE" NOT FOUND. PLEASE RESTART.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
56 minutes ago, Oedipus Wreckx-n-Effect said:

Just fry tofo. That shit honestly ain't that bad.

"Tofu".

I lived in Japan for ~two years.

 

It's about as healthy as any other fried "stuff".. (which means I eat it).

Also, Japanese bar food should be a thing here. Lots of fried bits of delicious stuff that you just gnaw on and do not question.

It's slightly more healthy than gnawing on plutonium, but meh, life is 100% terminal.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Oedipus Wreckx-n-Effect said:

So I've heard whisperings that the EU is banning memes.

 

Discuss.

 

That's a copyright law legally binding platform like facebook, youtube or any other web media hosting copyrighted content to systematically pass agreements with copyright owners.

 

Right now those plateforms are making money by hosting copyrighted content often without paying anything to the copyright owners.

As I understand it this law is saying that either the plateforms have an agreement with the copyright owners, giving them a share of the profits, or they have to implement filters to automatically take down copyrighted content before it even goes online. If said content manage to bypass the filters the one responsible for the violation will be hosting site.

 

The main idea is that there is no practical way to "hunt down" copyrighted content manually on plateform like youtube or facebook so we have to automate it, and the ones responsible for it would be those tech company since right now they are making a huge profit on it with little to no responsibility.

 

Now the fear is that since now the hosting sites will be juridically exposed (probably risking huge fines), they may try to play it extremely safe and put very restrictive bots/algorithm which will filter basically everything no questions asked (like if the copyrighted content was used as a basis for art, stating a political opinions or memes...) posing a risk of censorship.

 

That's a legit concern but it has more to do with the technical implantation of the law rather than it's base idea which is IMO good, those tech company are indeed making a huge profit on copyrighted contents without paying what they owe to copyright owners.

 

So my opinion on this is that either the bots will be too effective, posing a censorship problem, and the law will be quickly repelled on the basis that it infringe basic rights.

 

Or the platforms will actually start being proactive at passing agreements with copyright owners in the fear of legal actions (and in that case the objectives of the law will have been achieved).

 

Alternatively, uploaders will quickly find ways to bypass the filters (like how slightly changing the frequency of a music allowed to bypass youtube recognition bots) and the law will exist but will be mostly ineffective in practice and everybody will quickly forget about it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Alzoc said:

That's a copyright law legally binding platform like facebook, youtube or any other web media hosting copyrighted content to systematically pass agreements with copyright owners.

 

Right now those plateforms are making money by hosting copyrighted content often without paying anything to the copyright owners.

As I understand it this law is saying that either the plateforms have an agreement with the copyright owners, giving them a share of the profits, or they have to implement filters to automatically take down copyrighted content before it even goes online. If said content manage to bypass the filters the one responsible for the violation will be hosting site.

 

In other words, the EU banned memes?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Sturgeon said:

 

In other words, the EU banned memes?

 

Depends on how stupid the filters will be.

That or Facebook and Google will pay up.

 

What I was trying to say, is that since the law transfer the burden of scanning for copyright infringement to the hosting site, it's up to them on how they'll make it work.

If they go too far, they'll kill their business because nobody will use their site any more, not far enough and they'll have to pay fines.

Or it won't be technically possible to enforce that law without stepping on neutrality and freedom of the internet.

 

It's really up to the technical solution that will be chosen, so it's hard to tell.

For now I'm just waiting to see how it will turn up (first filters, first trials and fines, first bypassing tools, etc).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, Bronezhilet said:

As I understand it they're technically blanket banning everything, but only selectively enforcing it. 

 

I hope it won't end up like this, because that would mean transitioning to case law on this matter, which is always a huge pain since it create a lot of uncertainty of whether something is legal or not.

My guess if it comes to this, is that there will be one ruling of the CJEU which will precise the limits of the law once and for all at the first trial.

Since it generally give sensible answers to questions asked (in terms of protecting citizens rights), it wouldn't be the worst outcome.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
35 minutes ago, Alzoc said:

I wonder why I even bothered replying^^

 

I did appreciate the explanation, didn't mean to sound negative. Where the liability lands is certainly very interesting, but it also doesn't sound like "the EU is banning memes" is really that much of a mischaracterization. They have set the precedent that memes shared on a monetized platform are copyright infringement, so...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, Sturgeon said:

They have set the precedent that memes shared on a monetized platform are copyright infringement, so...

 

Didn't heard of that one but it's possible I guess.

To me copyright laws seem extremely convoluted and the whole thing look like a highly technical subject, so I'm withholding my judgement for now.

The intention looks good to me, I'm waiting to see how it will be implemented.

 

The road to hell is paved with good intentions like the other may say, so we'll see.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
24 minutes ago, Alzoc said:

To me copyright laws seem extremely convoluted and the whole thing look like a highly technical subject, so I'm withholding my judgement for now.

 

Yeah, I think we're well overdue for an overhaul of copyright law. Not that the Mouse will let that happen...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 6/25/2018 at 9:08 PM, Alzoc said:

 

Didn't heard of that one but it's possible I guess.

To me copyright laws seem extremely convoluted and the whole thing look like a highly technical subject, so I'm withholding my judgement for now.

The intention looks good to me, I'm waiting to see how it will be implemented.

 

The road to hell is paved with good intentions like the other may say, so we'll see.

I am highly skeptical to this law.  Considering all the policing, witch hunts, smear campaigns and the "It is a automated system, therefor, we are not actually acting like a Totalitarian police state with very vague rules to allow us to ban indiscreetly anyone we like , it is just some bugs ;)" we see in mayor social media platforms. Most youtubers are switching to patron type income because they are shut down for questionable reasons. 

 

The Nazi's just wanted to clean out the inferior, degenerate part of humanity.  To make sure only the best suited would lead on the next era of humanity.  
They only had good intentions right? 

 

Well, history speaks for itself. 

 

If they pull it off as they claim. Kudos to them. But I am sure they have a few hidden intentions. And if not, then the next generation will exploit it. 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Similar Content

    • By T___A
      Reposting for those that didn't see it the first time around:

       
      https://www.theepochtimes.com/spygate-the-true-story-of-collusion_2684629.html
    • By T___A
      Might as well make a new thread now that the election is over.
    • By Tied
      Yes
       
      i personally support it, by finding the KGB Felix Dzerzhinsky greatly improved state scurrility both inside the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics and abroad (their jurisdiction was only domestic, but they kept the internationally influential people safe at night)   a dedicated defender of both the Revolution and all the Soviet peoples     what do you think of this news?
    • By Xoon
      Colonization Of The Solar System

       
      This thread is for discussing the colonization of the solar system, mainly focusing on Mars and the Moon since they are the most relevant. 
      Main topics include transportation, industry, agriculture, economics, civil engineering,  energy production and distribution, habitation, ethics and politics. 
       
       
       
       
      First order of business, our glories tech messiah Elon Musk has set his eyes on Mars:
      Reason stated? Because being a interplanetary species beats being a single planetary species. 
       
      How does he plan to do this?
      By sending two cargo ships by 2022 to Mars for surveying and building  basic infrastructure, then two years later in 2024 sending 4 ships, two cargo ships and two crewed ships to start the colonization. First thing would be to build fuel refineries and expanding infrastructure to support more ships, then starting to mine and build industry. 
       
      This could mark a new era in human history, a second colonization era, this time without the genocides. The economic potentials are incredible, a single asteroid could easily support the entire earths gold, silver and platinum production for a decade. The moon holds a lot of valuable Helium 3, which right now is worth 12 000 dollars per kilogram! Helium is a excellent material for nuclear reactors. 
       
       
       

       
       
      Speaking about the moon, several companies have set their eyes on the moon, and for good reason.
      In my opinion,  the moon has the possibility of becoming a mayor trade hub for the solar system.  Why is this? Simply put, the earth has a few pesky things called gravity, atmosphere and environmentalists. This makes launching rockets off the moon much cheaper. The moon could even have a space elevator with current technology!  If we consider Elon Musk's plan to travel to Mars, then the Moon should be able to supply cheaper fuel and spaceship parts to space, to then be sent to Mars. The Moon is also rich in minerals that have not sunk to the core yet, and also has a huge amount of rare earth metals, which demands are rapidly increasing. Simply put, the Moon would end up as a large exporter to both the earth and potentially Mars. Importing from earth would almost always be more expensive compared to a industrialized Moon. 
       
      Now how would we go about colonizing the moon? Honestly, in concept it is quite simple.When considering locations, the South pole seems like the best candidate. This is because of it's constant sun spots, which could give 24 hour solar power to the colony and give constant sunlight to plants without huge power usage. The south pole also contain dark spots which contains large amount of frozen water, which would be used to sustain the agriculture and to make rocket fuel. It is true that the equator has the largest amounts of Helium 3 and the best location for rocket launches. However, with the lack of constant sunlight and frequent solar winds and meteor impacts, makes to unsuited for initial colonization. If the SpaceX's BFR successes, then it would be the main means of transporting materials to the moon until infrastructure is properly developed. Later a heavy lifter would replace it when transporting goods to and from the lunar surface, and specialized cargo ship for trans portion between the Moon, Earth and Mars. A space elevator would reduce prices further in the future.  Most likely, a trade station would be set up in CIS lunar space and Earth orbit which would house large fuel tanks and be able to hold the cargo from  cargo ships and heavy lifters. Sun ports would be designated depending on their amount of sunlight. Year around sunlight spots would be dedicated to solar panels and agriculture. Varying sun spots would be used for storage, landing pads and in general everything. Dark spots would be designated to mining to extract its valuable water. Power production would be inistially almost purely solar, with some back up and smoothing out generators. Later nuclear reactors would take over, but serve as a secondary backup energy source. 
       
       
      The plan:
      If we can assume the BFR is a success, then we have roughly 150 ton of payload to work with per spaceship. The first spaceship would contain a satellite to survey colonization spot. Everything would be robotic at first. Several robots capable of building a LZ for future ships,  mining of the lunar surface for making solar panels for energy production, then mining and refinement for fuel for future expeditions. The lunar colony would be based underground, room and pillar mining would be used to cheaply create room that is also shielded from radiation and surface hazards. Copying the mighty tech priest, a second ship would come with people and more equipment. With this more large scale mining and ore refinement would be started. Eventually beginning to manufacturing their own goods. Routinely BFRs would supply the colony with special equipment like electronics, special minerals and advanced equipment and food until the agricultural sector can support the colony.  The colony would start to export Helium 3 and rocket fuel, as well as spacecraft parts and scientific materials. Eventually becoming self sustaining, it would stop importing food and equipment, manufacturing it all themselves to save costs. 
       
      I am not the best in agriculture, so if some knowledge people could teach us here about closed loop farming, or some way of cultivating the lunar soil. Feel free to do so.
       
       
      Mining:
      I found a article here about the composition of the lunar soil and the use for it's main components:

      In short, the moon has large amounts of oxygen, silicon, aluminum, calcium, iron, magnesium and titanium in it's soil.
      How do we refine them? By doing this.
       
      Aluminum could be used for most kinds of wiring to requiring high conductivity to density ratio. Meaning power lines, building cables and such. Aluminum is not very suited for building structures on the surface because of the varying temperatures causing it to expand and contract. Iron or steel is better suited here. Aluminum could however be used in underground structures where temperatures are more stable.  Aluminum would also most likely end up as the main lunar rocket fuel. Yes, aluminum as rocket fuel. Just look at things like ALICE, or Aluminum-oxygen. Aluminum-oxygen would probably win out since ALICE uses water, which would be prioritized for the BFRs, since I am pretty sure they are not multi-fuel. 
       More on aluminum rocket fuel here:
      https://forum.kerbalspaceprogram.com/index.php?/topic/88130-aluminum-as-rocket-fuel/&
      http://www.projectrho.com/public_html/rocket/realdesigns2.php#umlunar
      https://blogs.nasa.gov/Rocketology/2016/04/15/weve-got-rocket-chemistry-part-1/
      https://blogs.nasa.gov/Rocketology/2016/04/21/weve-got-rocket-chemistry-part-2/
       
      Believe it or not, but calcium is actually a excellent conductor, about 12% better than copper. So why do we not use it on earth? Because it has a tendency to spontaneously combust in the atmosphere. In a vacuum however, this does not pose a problem. I does however need to be coated in a material so it does not deteriorate. This makes it suited for "outdoor" products and compact electrical systems like electric motors. Yes, a calcium electric motor.  
       
       
      Lastly, a few articles about colonizing the moon:
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colonization_of_the_Moon
      https://www.sciencealert.com/nasa-scientists-say-we-could-colonise-the-moon-by-2022-for-just-10-billion
      https://www.nasa.gov/audience/foreducators/topnav/materials/listbytype/HEP_Lunar.html
       
      NASA article about production of solar panels on the moon:
      https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/20050110155.pdf
       
      Map over the south pole:
      http://lroc.sese.asu.edu/images/gigapan
       
       
      Feel free to spam the thread with news regarding colonization. 
       
       
×