Jump to content
Sturgeon's House
Sign in to follow this  
Domichan

105x617 DM53 APFSDS-T?

Recommended Posts

Hello all,

I apologize for the fact that my first post is a question. I am a Dutch collector of medium and large calibre AP ammunition and I recently bought an 105mm APFSDS-T projectile, that is marked with the designation DM53. The 120mm DM53 is well known, but I cannot find any information on the 105mm DM53. I do know the IMI M426/DM63 round exists, for I have seen pictures of that, which would indicate that a DM53 would exist as well, in accordance with the way German ammo designations go. Questions to Rheinmetall, the Bundeswehr and various collector groups have remained unanswered. 

Among the experts here, is there anyone who has information on this type of APFSDS-T Round?

Thank you in advance,

Domichan

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Most of the German 105 mm APFSDS ammunition was made by Diehl BGT Defence rather than Rheinmetall; apparently Diehl produced the 105 mm DM13 APDS (licence production of a British design), the 105 mm DM23 APFSDS (licenced copy of the Israeli M111 "Hetz"), the 105 mm DM33 APFSDS (IMI M413) and the 105 mm DM63 (IMI M426). The 105 mm DM43 APFSDS was made by Rheinmetall however.

 

I don't know who made the 105 mm DM53, maybe it never entered full service and was skipped like the 120 mm DM43 APFSDS. There is a projectile claimed to be from a 105 mm DM53 round on display in a German museum.

 

 

roECVxV.jpg

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21 hours ago, SH_MM said:

Most of the German 105 mm APFSDS ammunition was made by Diehl BGT Defence rather than Rheinmetall; apparently Diehl produced the 105 mm DM13 APDS (licence production of a British design), the 105 mm DM23 APFSDS (licenced copy of the Israeli M111 "Hetz"), the 105 mm DM33 APFSDS (IMI M413) and the 105 mm DM63 (IMI M426). The 105 mm DM43 APFSDS was made by Rheinmetall however.

 

I don't know who made the 105 mm DM53, maybe it never entered full service and was skipped like the 120 mm DM43 APFSDS. There is a projectile claimed to be from a 105 mm DM53 round on display in a German museum.

 

 

 

 

 

Thank you SH_MM, for the additional information. The projectile I have, has a completely different shape than the one pictured. The front part is slightly wider than the rest of the penetrator, similar to the looks of the 120mm DM33. 

 

14 hours ago, Bronezhilet said:

Whom did you contact there by the way?

I contacted their general @mindef email address. No reply yet. I did manage to get a direct email address from someone who works there, if I don't get a reply shortly, I'll contact that person directly.

 

I also contacted the Munitie Technologisch Museum in Landhorst. They did not have any information on this type and thought it might be an experimental type.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Domichan said:

 

I contacted their general @mindef email address. No reply yet. I did manage to get a direct email address from someone who works there, if I don't get a reply shortly, I'll contact that person directly.

 

I also contacted the Munitie Technologisch Museum in Landhorst. They did not have any information on this type and thought it might be an experimental type.

Well get ready to type that mail because knowing our MoD, KCWM will never get your question. 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Email sent. Hopefully, he will reply.

I am also planning to vist the Wehrtechnische Sammlung in Cologne in a weeks time, I will check their library for any possible information.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 5/2/2018 at 6:51 PM, Bronezhilet said:

Does that display even have a sign? I don't remember there being one, although it's been 2 years since I was there so my memory is probably faulty.

 

I cannot remember either. However in another forum, where somebody posted all forums of his visit, he claimed that this was the 105 mm DM53.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I received a reply from the Gentleman working at the KCWM. The type is not known to them, so not tested in The Netherlands. 

The search continues.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
48 minutes ago, Domichan said:

I received a reply from the Gentleman working at the KCWM. The type is not known to them, so not tested in The Netherlands. 

The search continues.

Mind sending me a private message with whom you asked?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Received a reply from the Wehr Technische Dienstelle 91, were they test ammunition for the Bundeswher, that this projectile is unknown to them.

The search continues.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Similar Content

    • By Militarysta
      About tank guns and amunition, hope it will be interesting topic :-)
       
      In penetration data I will base on russian sources -they are ussaly most credible (the best). I will ussaly give value for monolith steel plate slopped on 60@ - it's the best scenario for APFSDS penetrator. In sucht scenario (slopped on 60@ plate) penetration value can be bigger at even 17-20% then on 0.degree plate - this is caused by "asymmetry loads back surface" of the plate):

       
       
      First:
      M829
      M829A1
      M829A2
      M829A3
      M829A4
       
      M829:
      DOI: 1985
      penetration at 2km, on plate slopped by 60@: 540-560mm RHA:
       
       

       
       
      M829A1
      DOI - 1989 (in some sources - 1988) 
      penetration: at 2km, on plate slopped by 60@: circa 700mm RHA
      this round was to weak to overcome T-80U and T-80UD and T-72B m.1989 whit Kontakt-5 ERA, what was "suprisly" discover on tests in circa 1994. The same story was whit DM43 prototypes..
       

       
      M829A2
      DOI - 1992
      penetration: at 2km, on plate slopped by 60@: circa 740mm RHA
      Fist US round whit composite sabot.
       
      (lack good photos)
      insted of this:
       
      KE-W so M829A1 but whit WHA penetrator, and KEW-E3 so M829A2 whit WHA long rod.

       
       
      M829A3
      DOI - 2003
      penetration: at 2km, on plate slopped by 60@: propably circa 800mm RHA, but is not sure value,
      round devleoped to everpas heavy ERA but whit unkown result
       

       
       
      M829A4
      DOI -2016 :-)
       
      penetration - no idea 
      It's very interesting round
       

       
      data link is  for APFSDS round?!
      I have a hypothesis...
      Ok so it have data link to be programmed, it is said to be capable to defeat 3rd generation heavy ERA (Relikt, Knife, etc.) and active protection systems (hard kill). It seems that focus is primary on defeating heavy ERA. But then again, why do you need to program just a long rod fired by a big gun?

      There are few options:

      - Gudining the round,
      - Precursor,
      - "Intelligent" control over propelant charge ignition (dependant on propelant temperature, environment temperature, gun service life, range to target etc.)

      And truth to be told hypothesis that there is some sort of precursor in the rod is the only hypothesis that makes sense. Control over propelant charge ignition is not needed and probably not possible at all with current technology, besides the M829A4 (and all newer US ammo types for 120mm smoothbore) use insensitive propelant charges. And it is nowhere mentioned in any document avaiable for public. Guiding the rod to target? Perhaps possible from technical point of view, but why? Again it was nowhere said that FCS for M1A2SEPv3 have ability to guide any type of rounds. And manouvering of the rod during flight means loss of a lot of energy, even if this manouvering would be done to "cheat" the APS for example.

      So perhaps the option is to somehow use a precursor that is "fired ahead" of the main rod.


       
       
      So how the rod designs looks like here? The rod is made from two segments, the "precursor" and the main rod behind it. How they are connected? it might be some sort of polymer, glue that can be weakened by heat and the release precursor, and during flight rods heat up pretty nicely.

      The precursor can also be relased based on a simple difference of speed between it and the main rod, and main rod can be slowed down by some sort of additional fins (aerodynamic breaks) released at specific point programmed by FCS. In such case precuros would initiate ERA and the main rod would have a clear way to main armor of the target.

      How to cheat APS tough? Counting that precursor will be qualified by APS as threat and APS will be initiated, creating a time gap in APS reaction so it won't be able to counter the main rod? Possible yes, but then there is question, if APS will just not ignore the precursor, and this might happen, now of course there is a question how dangerous is precursor itself? For a MBT or vehicle with similiar levels of protection, for it's front it won't be dangerous in most cases, sides? If they do not have any addon armor, very possible. For lightweight platforms, yeah precursor also will be dangerous.

      Of course these are only hypothesis, and we will see if other nations will also design APFSDS rounds with data link. Then we might get closer to the truth. Right now, treat it as food for thoughts.
       
      of course this data link coud be placed only for security resons, as one person on TankNet had wrote:
       
      :-)
       
      ps. prefragmentet APFSDS during flying exist now, as smal-scale models and test object:

×