Jump to content
Sturgeon's House

Recommended Posts

55 minutes ago, That_Baka said:

I think thats because ID range can interpreted vaguely.  And offcourse there is the question of the claimed performance like with MILAN maximum perforation in british tests .

Nothing vaguely, recognition range for a tank target in narrow field view is 2,6-2,8 km for Nocturne.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Pascal said:

Nothing vaguely, recognition range for a tank target in narrow field view is 2,6-2,8 km for Nocturne.

Uhh sources? Because all i can find is BTVT which quotes 3km.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Seems that the turret front is much more armored than T-14. Perhaps its justified because of the ammo being in the bustle. As for the autoloader, reminds me a lot of Leclerc but the ammo count (16 rounds) is surprisingly low, that would explain the need for the bustle to be detachable.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That's 130mm but according to other Rheinmetall's patent the case of 130mm is only longer than one in 120mm, not wider. So it seems that turret without add-on armor could be quite small.

 

3 hours ago, alanch90 said:

On the other hand, it's unlikely that they are 140mm since those are two piece.

 

Nexter has shown turret with 140mm and autoloader in own patent. And it looks like this.

u6dDb2w.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Zadlo said:

That's 130mm but according to other Rheinmetall's patent the case of 130mm is only longer than one in 120mm, not wider.

Yes. We have seen mockups both for 130mm and 140mm, both are as wide as 120mm, but 140mm is like two 120mm cases glued together

 

130mm:

newtankshells-1.jpg

 

140mm:

80d6e81ba6a190d0744a5092d27ff17c.png

 

 

8 minutes ago, Zadlo said:

Nexter has shown turret with 140mm and autoloader in own patent. And it looks like this.

u6dDb2w.png


What is that monstrosity?!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Looks like a flipped-over FASTDRAW. That turret is guaranteed to have fat cheeks...

 

14 hours ago, alanch90 said:

Seems that the turret front is much more armored than T-14. Perhaps its justified because of the ammo being in the bustle. As for the autoloader, reminds me a lot of Leclerc but the ammo count (16 rounds) is surprisingly low, that would explain the need for the bustle to be detachable.

 

The XM91 autoloader on the M1 CATTB had 17 rounds and those were 140mm, though that tank was supposed to have TWO extra carousels (22 rounds, folded) inside the hull for reloads:

 

Spoiler

Xnmogun.jpg
luDepOh.jpg

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Long_Rodney said:

So is that supposed to be at least a half realistic sketch, or just another futuristic concept art?

 

There are patents for this thing, but it might not be directly related to the MGCS (as the MGCS is still in the concept stage, armament, size, crew, etc. all have yet to be decided).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That's a weird and surprising concept art. Track, sprocket and running wheels are just like the Leo 2, but there are 6 instead of 7 although more separated which would suggest similar vehicle length. The layout sugfgest a forward engine placement (or perhaps is a hybrid electric type, with one engine in the front and the other in the back?), the whole vehicle seems like a leopard 2 driving in reverse. The absence of crew hatches in the front suggest an entrance through the back of the vehicle, ala Merkava. If this is the case, unless the powerpack is super compact (much more than MTU engine used in Leo 2). Its hard to speculate about a big module of passive armor on the front. Its hard to judge where the crew actually sits but they might be just under the turret ring. In fact, only if the engine is of similar dimensions as in the Euro powerpack and the crew is sitting that far back, only then i can imagine a big block of armor between the engine and the crew compartment. And yes, that is some thick side armor right there.

If the layout is as i´m picturing it, then its reasonable that all the ammo be placed in the turret bustle, as in the patents we got a couple of weeks ago. The turret seems to be almost unnaturally flat, perhaps that menas that in order to depress the gun, part of the roof hinges open. I can see a vertical slit halfway to the bustle (in the picture seems near the commanders CITV), perhaps its the for a machinegun? In the hull front i can spot optical devices very similar as those in the turret, might be cameras or laser detectors. As for the main gun itself, it should be a 130mm but doesn´t look like it, it seems too short (if the overall vehicle dimensions are as i imagine) and that muzzle break ...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, alanch90 said:

That's a weird and surprising concept art.

 

I think it is most likely a vehicle design based on a reconfigured Lynx KF41 hull. The rear of the hull (which has a ramp in the center and exhaust air-vents on either side) looks almost identical.

 

6 minutes ago, Molota_477 said:

Where's this screenshot from>?

 

Yesterday's capital markets day (i.e. where Rheinmetall presents last years results and forecast for the next year to investors). Unfortunately this year's slides are of poor quality, almost as if someone took screenshots from a low bit-rate stream.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 11/9/2019 at 1:46 AM, Renegade334 said:

Looks like a flipped-over FASTDRAW. That turret is guaranteed to have fat cheeks...

 

 

The XM91 autoloader on the M1 CATTB had 17 rounds and those were 140mm, though that tank was supposed to have TWO extra carousels (22 rounds, folded) inside the hull for reloads:

 

  Hide contents

Xnmogun.jpg
luDepOh.jpg

 


Do you happen to have a squarer/closer image of the top diagram? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Similar Content

    • By Walter_Sobchak
      I realized that we don't actually have a thread about the British Chieftain tank.  
       
      I posted a bunch of Chieftain related stuff on my site today for anyone who is interested.  The items include:
       
      Magazine Articles
       
      1970 article from ARMOR
      1970 article from IDR  - Chieftain-Main Battle tank for the 1970s
      1976 article from IDR - The Combat-Improved Chieftain – First Impressions
      1976 article from IDR - Improved Chieftain for Iran
       
      Government reports
       
      WO 194-495 Assessment of Weapon System in Chieftain
      WO 341-108 Automotive Branch Report on Chieftain Modifications
      DEFE 15-1183 – L11 Brochure 
      WO 194-463 – Demonstration of Chieftain Gun 
       
      WO 194-1323 – Feasibility study on Burlington Chieftain
    • By Walter_Sobchak
      Bundeswehr Weasel and British Light tank Mark IV
       

    • By Belesarius
      http://www.janes.com/article/52476/german-army-receives-first-production-standard-puma-aifv
       
      30mm with airburst capability, and supposedly better mine protection than a Leo 2.
       
    • By Mighty_Zuk
      Welcome to Mighty Zuk's place of mental rest and peace of mind. This is my realm. 
      I've decided it would be best to ditch the old Merkava thread for 2 reasons:
      1)It does not feature any bunched up information in its main post, and valuable information is scattered across different posts on different pages. 
      2)Many AFVs that are not related to the Merkava, or related but are not it, appear in that thread with improper representation. There are other AFVs than the Merkava, and it would be better to refer to them in a general way.
       
      As time will go by, I will arrange this thread into a sort of information center. 
       
      I will take up a few first comment spaces to make sure proper amount of information can be stacked up on the front page and for easier access for everyone.
       
      [Reserved for future posts - Merkava]
×
×
  • Create New...