Jump to content
Sturgeon's House
2805662

Land 400 Phase 3: Australian IFV

Recommended Posts

On 12/20/2018 at 10:49 PM, Serge said:

Yes, but the Griffin II is a low profil chassis. It’s very different. 

 

That’s my point. GD is offering AJAX-based variants only. They have been stressing the proven, low risk nature of their family of vehicles from the outset. Griffin (any variant) haven’t been accepted into service by any country and haven’t been subjected to a customer’s engineering & qualification processes like the AJAX families. Apart from being from the same OEM, it has no standing within the context of Land 400 Phase 3, as far as I can see. What “impact” are you suggesting?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think because both Griffin-Il and III are an evolution of the Ajax, the proposition for Land-400 can gain from them. 

They can integrate some details, but GDLS-A can propose a low profile of the Ajax chassis for long term need. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Mighty_Zuk said:

Yep. The superstructure is rarely ever meaningful when talking about cost and ease of production, let alone risk.

 

For a rational customer, I’d agree. 

 

However, the strength of GD’s potential offering is that, with the exception of the IFV hull (arguably the simplest of the family), they are offering a fully mature, technically certified & qualified family of vehicles, as accepted by the British, from whom the majority of standards & procedures used by the Land Engineering Agency (LEA) are derived from (Def Stans & DEF(AUST)s). Deviation from already-qualified vehicles undermines this narrative, which is “Low Technical Risk/Military Off The Shelf”. 

 

Let’s look at some decisions that GD have made so far regarding production. 

- hulls will be manufactured as ‘green’ hulls in existing facilities (so as not to risk perceived technical maturity). 

- hulls won’t use Australian steel (so as not to risk perceived technical maturity). 

 

Based on the above, and that nowhere in the L400 RFT is a requirement for calibres above 30mm, Griffin 1-3, whilst interesting, and illustrative of design capabilities and future options, aren’t really relevant to the L400-3 activity. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

from IAV 2019 -
what appears to be the same model as one which was shown back in September, but this time it's yellow-ish desert-ish instead of tri-colour camo
Dxgxh0mWsAAdiJ6.jpg:large)
(from this tweet https://twitter.com/gduknews/status/1087673769571831808)

Dxhh1HbXQAAiOvn.jpg:large
(from this tweet https://twitter.com/nicholadrummond/status/1087726889618288640)

and from this article https://defense-update.com/20190121_iron-fists-aps-for-the-australian-boxers.html 

Quote

AJAX_Land400-3_725.jpg
IF-LC is also included in the AJAX based tracked vehicle General Dynamics Land Systems UK (GDLS-UK) propose to the Australian Land 400 Phase 3, intended to replace the M113s in the future. A model of that vehicle was also unveiled by GDLS at the #IAVevent. Photo: Defense-Update
Ajax_land400_3_1_725.jpg
The AJAX proposed for Land 400 Phase III uses a manned GDLS turret that mounts an ATK 30mm cannon and a missile launcher. In addition to the two IF-LC active protection units the turret also uses dual, multi-sensor EO targeting system (note the protected, rotating commander sight) and the acoustic sensor behind it. Photo: Defense-Update

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, Mighty_Zuk said:

So, the Aussies want an evaluation of only the Iron Fist LC for the Boxer, because it's the only one meeting weight requirements.

This means the Phase 3 vehicle will have to use it as well.

No necessarily. Not even the 30mm gun has to be common across the phases. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Mighty_Zuk said:

So the whole commonality thing is now gone? 

 

 

Apart from GFE, there’s no commonality requirement across the phases of L400. CASG wasn’t reigned in enough before RFT release, IMO. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 1/22/2019 at 9:39 AM, skylancer-3441 said:

what appears to be the same model as one which was shown back in September, but this time it's yellow-ish desert-ish instead of tri-colour camo

 

It is. The model shipped to Australia in September painted green, I helped out a mate by repainting it the day before the tradeshow (Land Forces) into the camouflage, after DVD in the UK, the model was repainted into the desert scheme and will (likely) appear at IDEX this week in Abu Dhabi. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Similar Content

    • By delfosisyu
      I can't read russian or ukraine language so the range of information is very limited for russian AFVs.
       
       
      I'd like to have information about how fast turrets of soviet IFVs rotate.
       
       
      Especially BMP2, BMP3, BTR-82
    • By Belesarius
      http://www.janes.com/article/53057/boxer-the-favourite-for-lithuanian-ifv-buy
       
      30mm Cannon and Javelins for armament.
      Is that the first vehicle mounting the Jav?
       
    • By Belesarius
      http://www.janes.com/article/52476/german-army-receives-first-production-standard-puma-aifv
       
      30mm with airburst capability, and supposedly better mine protection than a Leo 2.
       
    • By LostCosmonaut
      There are some who believe that Infantry Fighting Vehicles, such as the CV90 or BMP, are an inherently flawed concept. These people contend that IFVs try to be both a tank and an armored personel carrier, and fail to effectively perform in either role. As a result, were a sustained high-intensity conflict to occur, they would fare poorly. To my uninformed eye, this argument appears to have some merit. However, I am curious to hear to opinions of those more knowledgable than myself (or heck, anyone with an opinion at all).
×