Jump to content
Sturgeon's House

US Politics Thread: Year 2 of 1000 of the TrumpenReich


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Here's the thing, most conservatives I know are ardent anti-racists and have been their whole life. Judging others as individuals is a core part of their morality since they were young, imparted to th

Finally,  a Trump proposal I can support.

I am saying that.  If the Democrats want to remain competitive, they need to dig out decades worth of Chicago machine apparatchiks and Clinton lackeys and send them to the salt mines.  If the Republic

4 hours ago, Walter_Sobchak said:

 

The costs to the American tax payer caused by illegal immigration is actually pretty hard to measure.  That said, many of these immigrants pay taxes while being ineligable for most government assistance.  

 

Wiki has a pretty good rundown of the ecomonic impact.

 

Professor of Law Francine Lipman writes that the belief that illegal migrants are exploiting the US economy and that they cost more in services than they contribute to the economy is "undeniably false".[43] Lipman asserts that "illegal immigrants actually contribute more to public coffers in taxes than they cost in social services" and "contribute to the U.S. economy through their investments and consumption of goods and services; filling of millions of essential worker positions resulting in subsidiary job creation, increased productivity and lower costs of goods and services; and unrequited contributions to Social Security, Medicare and unemployment insurance programs."

 

They even vote Democrat!

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Sgt.Squarehead said:

You guys really do need 'The Wall'.....Things are going to go completely tits up on your southern border once your new fascist pet in Brazil summons up the balls to attack Venezuela for you.  ;)

 

you say that like having our fascist pet in Brazil invading Venezuela like somehow it's a BAD thing!

 

...

 

Screw it. I've been looking at wars in South America and those lazy bastards haven't had any interesting war down there between South American nation states since practically the 19th Century!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm a Unificator. Not a Divider-Upper. Let's bring the differing political factions of SH together again to all laugh at how Ben Shapiro, who is so much smarter and intellectually gifted than everyone else, thought it was a good idea to talk about Baby Hitler during the Right to Life rally in DC.

 

Ben Shapiro at March For Life rally: 'No pro-life person would kill baby Hitler'

https://thehill.com/homenews/media/426100-ben-shapiro-at-march-for-life-rally-no-pro-life-person-would-kill-baby-hitler

 

And THIS is how he defended himself.

 

 

The Twatter comments are gold.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, Ulric said:

 

Well, fuck it, open borders and universal healthcare then! Why the fuck not! Who needs nation states anymore these days anyways. 

 

Why is it so goddamn hard to ask people to follow the fucking law? Because everytime someone suggests that we actually obey the rules that we have set out, some fucking retard pops out of the woodwork talking out of their ass with shit like "achtusualliey, it's a good thing that we have a shit load of people in our country illegally, they are net contributors!" Nice job referencing Wikipedia, and collage professors are always correct and never have a liberal bias. But I'm just a racist bigot, you know, I'll go drag my knuckles off back to the boonies where I belong.

 

Next time I post a link to wikipedia, I'll be sure to post a trigger warning.

Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Walter_Sobchak said:

 

Next time I post a link to wikipedia, I'll be sure to post a trigger warning.

 

Just don't expect anyone to take your seriously if you link Wikipedia articles about politically charged issues. Nevermind the fact that performing a cost analysis on a national scale regarding people who, by their very nature, operate either partially or entirely out of the system with limited to no documentation is going to give you enough play room to tilt the numbers however you want them. That's about as accurate as the global warming predictions that we've been getting for the past 30 years.

 

But, I do have some simple questions for you. Is it wrong for us (we, the people, via our government) to decide who can come into our country? Is it wrong for us to enforce our laws? Is it wrong to punish people who break the law?

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Ulric said:

 

Just don't expect anyone to take your seriously if you link Wikipedia articles about politically charged issues. Nevermind the fact that performing a cost analysis on a national scale regarding people who, by their very nature, operate either partially or entirely out of the system with limited to no documentation is going to give you enough play room to tilt the numbers however you want them. That's about as accurate as the global warming predictions that we've been getting for the past 30 years.

 

But, I do have some simple questions for you. Is it wrong for us (we, the people, via our government) to decide who can come into our country? Is it wrong for us to enforce our laws? Is it wrong to punish people who break the law?

 

The first sentence of that wiki article is" The economic impact of illegal immigrants in the United States is challenging to measure and politically contentious."  Ther first line in my post was "The costs to the American tax payer caused by illegal immigration is actually pretty hard to measure."  You were the one that made the blanket statement that illegal immigrants cost US taxpayers billions of dollars.  I said "it's more complicated than that", and you respond by saying "it's hard to measure."  

Link to post
Share on other sites
12 hours ago, Donward said:

 

you say that like having our fascist pet in Brazil invading Venezuela like somehow it's a BAD thing!

 

...

 

Screw it. I've been looking at wars in South America and those lazy bastards haven't had any interesting war down there between South American nation states since practically the 19th Century!

 

I look forward to the great South American tank battle featuring Venezuelan AMX-30 tanks versus Brazillian Leopard 1 tanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites
18 minutes ago, Walter_Sobchak said:

 

The first sentence of that wiki article is" The economic impact of illegal immigrants in the United States is challenging to measure and politically contentious."  Ther first line in my post was "The costs to the American tax payer caused by illegal immigration is actually pretty hard to measure."  You were the one that made the blanket statement that illegal immigrants cost US taxpayers billions of dollars.  I said "it's more complicated than that", and you respond by saying "it's hard to measure."  

 

Ok, fair point, we both admit that it's very difficult to measure. You also provided a quote from someone saying that illegals are a net benefit to our system to counter my assertion that they are a burden on the taxpaying citizenry.

 

But as usual, keep ignoring the simple questions that I ask.

Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, Belesarius said:

I'm going to repeat a question. Here in Canada, you need a valid SSN to claim welfare. Is that not the case in the US? Any sort of benefits are tracked very very tightly here. 

 

For example, illegals can and do vote. They're not supposed to be able to, but why do you think the DNC is so vocally opposed to any sort of voter ID law?

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Ulric said:

 

Ok, fair point, we both admit that it's very difficult to measure. You also provided a quote from someone saying that illegals are a net benefit to our system to counter my assertion that they are a burden on the taxpaying citizenry.

 

But as usual, keep ignoring the simple questions that I ask.

If you mean your question about the law, I think that in general the law should be followed.  Law is the foundation of civilization.  That said, my favorite quote regarding the law is from Frank Zappa who said "The United States is a nation of laws, badly written and randomly enforced.” 

 

(For the record, I am not a Frank Zappa fan, but I do like that particular quote.)

Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Walter_Sobchak said:

If you mean your question about the law, I think that in general the law should be followed.  Law is the foundation of civilization.  That said, my favorite quote regarding the law is from Frank Zappa who said "The United States is a nation of laws, badly written and randomly enforced.” 

 

(For the record, I am not a Frank Zappa fan, but I do like that particular quote.)

 

So we should enforce the law by allowing people to illegally immigrate? I'm sorry, I'm a bit confused by your position, here.


Do you also support auditing the voter rolls and passing Voter ID laws to allow the current laws on who can and can't vote to be enforced?

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Walter_Sobchak said:

If you mean your question about the law, I think that in general the law should be followed.  Law is the foundation of civilization.  That said, my favorite quote regarding the law is from Frank Zappa who said "The United States is a nation of laws, badly written and randomly enforced.” 

 

(For the record, I am not a Frank Zappa fan, but I do like that particular quote.)

 

You are preaching to the choir with that quote. Having to tip toe my way through US firearms laws everyday, I know just how badly written and conceived they can be. There are many aspects of immigration law that I probably would consider to be poorly written or unnecessary, but overarching concepts from them are still applicable. The issue is when you have 11 million (or whatever the number is now) people here knowingly and intentionally breaking the law and not being punished for doing so, that erodes the foundation of civilization.

Link to post
Share on other sites

For me, as an outsider, it's does look pretty hypocritical of the Democrats, who under Obama fully supported an essentially identical policy, to make such a fuss.....I can see why they are doing it of course, Trump's an infantile buffoon, so they know they'll get an ill-measured response of some kind that their partisan press can run with.  Kindergarten politics.  :rolleyes:

 

PS - Zappa's a shill & his 'music' sucks c**k.  :mellow:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Living in Washington State, I love the fact that my Drivers License is not considered a valid form of ID because our state hands them out, willy-nilly to illegals, thus forcing me to carry a different form of ID should I want to be able to fly domestically or enter a Federal building. 

 

But illegal immigration is a victimless crime...

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Sturgeon said:

 

So we should enforce the law by allowing people to illegally immigrate? I'm sorry, I'm a bit confused by your position, here.


Do you also support auditing the voter rolls and passing Voter ID laws to allow the current laws on who can and can't vote to be enforced?

 

My comments concerning the law were not specific to any particular issue since Ulric posed the question in a very general sense.  

 

However, since you want to know my opinion...

 

As to immigration, I am no expert on immigration or immigration law.  To me, it seems resonable to provide a path to citizenship for the Dreamers.  We also need a workable program for migrant workers to come to the US and do the jobs most Americans don't want to do.  From the statistics I have seen, illegal immigration is at an all time low compared to it's peak in the 1990's.  While illegal immigration in that period was characterized by single males looking for work, we currently are seeing an uptick in entire families travelling to the border, many from Honduras.  Perhaps the US should do something to help stabilize Honduras, although that sort of thing is always easier said than done.  

 

These are somewhat separate issues from border security, which deals not just with people, but with drugs and criminal activity.  As I understand it, most illegal drugs and illegal immigrants come into the country via legal means, not through the deserts of the American Southwest.  It seems to me that investments in technology and tools, better training for border agents and fencing in appropriate areas is a better solution than a monolithic wall stretching from sea to shining sea.  I am particularly opposed to the seizure of private lands through emminent domain to make room for the wall. 

 

As to the voting issue, I take claims that massive numbers of illegal immigrants vote with a grain of salt.  It seems to be an article of faith among conservatives, and yet Trump's own commission on voter fraud failed to provide much compelling evidence.  That an illegal immigrant would risk exposing their status for the sake of voting seems a bit unlikely to me. That said, I do not believe that Democrats are not above a bit of electoral shenanigans.  Kennedy won Chicago in 1960 with the help of many a dead voter.  

 

Auditing voter rolls is all well and good, assuming it's done in a fair and impartial manner.  Voter data should be in the hands of impartial, non partisan regulators.  This way we could help alleviate conservatives fears of non-citizens voting as well as liberal's fears of voter purges being used to target African American voters.  Same goes for drawing districts.  We need to end partisan gerrymandering.  

 

  

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, Sgt.Squarehead said:

For me, as an outsider, it's does look pretty hypocritical of the Democrats, who under Obama fully supported an essentially identical policy, to make such a fuss.....I can see why they are doing it of course, Trump's an infantile buffoon, so they know they'll get an ill-measured response of some kind that their partisan press can run with.  Kindergarten politics.  :rolleyes:

 

PS - Zappa's a shill & his 'music' sucks c**k.  :mellow:

 

Many years ago I worked for a couple months in a bakery where the guy in charge would only play Zappa and free form jazz on the boom box.  I have an intense hatred for both as a result.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Similar Content

    • By Belesarius
      https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/28613/everything-we-know-about-irans-claim-that-it-shot-down-a-u-s-rq-4-global-hawk-drone
       
      Might as well start a thred for this shit.  Looks like there is gonna be enough stuff to keep a solo thred going.
       
    • By Oedipus Wreckx-n-Effect
      After seeing the rampant crack down on speech in the UK, I decided that more should be done than just Thoughts and Prayers. 
       
      I know that it's a scary time for our UK members. Knowing that what you say on the internet can put you on the wrong side of a Bobby's nightstick, well, I find that despicable. 
       
      So I've created this place for all your impure or degenerate thoughts. Here's how it works. 
       
      Perhaps you want to say something "offensive". Instead of saying it yourself, you can message any US member of this forum and have them act as your avatar of avarice. 
       
      For example, say you had a particularly heinous fish and chips at the local pub. You may want to say, "Oi, that cheeky fucker Barnaby William can't do a proper chip if he had a fryer for hands!"
       
      This on it's own could send you straight to jail for defamation. Moreso, if instead of chips that sent you reeling it happened to be a kebab from Omar down the street. 
       
      Now your crime has gone from offensive to racially insensitive!
       
      Anytime such an urge comes along, call on your ex colonial friends. We will translate and post your complaint for all the world to revel in, free of charge!
       
      I personally think Omar should learn to pull the fucking kebab off heat before it's crisper than his wife's crotch and blacker than his beard. That tosser!
       
      See? Don't you feel better? And now, no one will be knocking on your door, serving you with a summons for being a racist git. 
       
    • By T___A
      Might as well make a new thread now that the election is over.
    • By Tied
      Yes
       
      i personally support it, by finding the KGB Felix Dzerzhinsky greatly improved state scurrility both inside the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics and abroad (their jurisdiction was only domestic, but they kept the internationally influential people safe at night)   a dedicated defender of both the Revolution and all the Soviet peoples     what do you think of this news?

×
×
  • Create New...