Jump to content
Sturgeon's House
T___A

US Politics Thread: Year 2 of 1000 of the TrumpenReich

Recommended Posts

O'Rourke’s strategy: Show Americans the real Beto

https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/426107-orourkes-strategy-show-americans-the-real-beto

 

It’s a new strategy: Connect with voters by providing minute-to-minute glimpses of daily life, and show authenticity in the process.

 

O'Rourke has taken his supporters along with him to a trip to the dentist for a routine clearning, shared diary-like entries about his life and talked of being in a “funk” after leaving his job as a Texas congressman.

 

In previous posts, O’Rourke documented his solo cross-country road trip. 

He ate blueberry cobbler at a stop along Route 66, and asked a waitress what he should see in Tucumcari, N.M. 

 

giphy.gif

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Walter_Sobchak said:

To me, it seems resonable to provide a path to citizenship for the Dreamers.

 

As long as it's enforced and not used as a loophole to stuff the country with illegals for political or economic gain, then I agree.

 

2 hours ago, Walter_Sobchak said:

We also need a workable program for migrant workers to come to the US and do the jobs most Americans don't want to do.

 

I don't think so. A better idea would be to curtail or even end the practice of funding the vampiric college system.

 

Of course I think workers of all types should have a pathway to the US that is much more navigable than it is now, but treating immigrants as a labor force strikes me as too volatile a policy to support.

 

2 hours ago, Walter_Sobchak said:

From the statistics I have seen, illegal immigration is at an all time low compared to it's peak in the 1990's.

 

Much to the chagrin of the DNC leadership, if true.

 

2 hours ago, Walter_Sobchak said:

While illegal immigration in that period was characterized by single males looking for work, we currently are seeing an uptick in entire families travelling to the border, many from Honduras.  Perhaps the US should do something to help stabilize Honduras, although that sort of thing is always easier said than done.

 

I'd trade intervention in the Middle East for a renewed Monroe Doctrine in a heartbeat, but weren't you one of the guys who complained about Trump pulling the troops out of Syria? Or was that just Bele? Honest question. Anyway, way I see it we have interests all over, and we must pick and choose where we intervene. Unbridled military activity around the globe is not financially sustainable.

 

2 hours ago, Walter_Sobchak said:

These are somewhat separate issues from border security, which deals not just with people, but with drugs and criminal activity.  As I understand it, most illegal drugs and illegal immigrants come into the country via legal means, not through the deserts of the American Southwest.

 

The issue is that rogue Mexican Army units in the pay of the Cartels can come over the border and kill Americans, dude.

http://www.nbcnews.com/id/11226144/ns/us_news-security/t/mexican-incursions-inflame-border-situation/#.XET9ilVKhhE

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2014/jun/17/feds-armed-mexican-troops-police-jump-border/

https://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/press-releases/judicial-watch-dhs-records-detail-mexican-government-helicopter-crossing-border-and-firing-on-border-patrol/

 

About any other country in the world would be at war with Mexico right now. You can stare at statistics (whether right or wrong) all you want, but don't close your eyes to this shit.

 

2 hours ago, Walter_Sobchak said:

It seems to me that investments in technology and tools, better training for border agents and fencing in appropriate areas is a better solution than a monolithic wall stretching from sea to shining sea.  I am particularly opposed to the seizure of private lands through emminent domain to make room for the wall. 

 

I thought Trump's wall was actually a fence. Eminent domain is a sticky issue as it's necessary for some security programs (yes, like the Wall, but also the Interstate Highway System) yet at the same time it's easily abused. I share your concern about it.

 

But basically, you support a wall (or fence, whatever terms you prefer), you just don't support The Wall. Why do you think that is?

 

2 hours ago, Walter_Sobchak said:

As to the voting issue, I take claims that massive numbers of illegal immigrants vote with a grain of salt.  It seems to be an article of faith among conservatives, and yet Trump's own commission on voter fraud failed to provide much compelling evidence.  That an illegal immigrant would risk exposing their status for the sake of voting seems a bit unlikely to me. That said, I do not believe that Democrats are not above a bit of electoral shenanigans.  Kennedy won Chicago in 1960 with the help of many a dead voter.  

 

Auditing voter rolls is all well and good, assuming it's done in a fair and impartial manner.  Voter data should be in the hands of impartial, non partisan regulators.  This way we could help alleviate conservatives fears of non-citizens voting as well as liberal's fears of voter purges being used to target African American voters.  Same goes for drawing districts.  We need to end partisan gerrymandering.  

 

Then we agree that the country should aggressively tackle voter fraud of any kind.

 

At the end of the day, I want a country that works. The US doesn't work. Democrats are evil, and the Republicans don't have the spine to fight them (also they are evil too). I know not what kind of creature Trump is, but at least he's a vertebrate, and hates the Democrats.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Based Lindsey Graham 2.0 is back

 

https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/426249-graham-angers-dems-by-digging-into-clinton-obama-controversies

 

And the Dems keeping it classy.

 

Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.), another member of the panel, said maybe Graham should “investigate Benghazi some more too” — an apparent reference to a years-long House probe that Democrats considered a political stunt.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Do eeeet!!!

How Bloomberg plans to create his own lane in 2020

‘Bloomberg’s kind of money buys a lot of loyalty — or at least silence. 

 

https://www.politico.com/story/2019/01/21/michael-bloomberg-2020-election-1116071

 

White. Male. Old. A Wall Street billionaire.

At first glance, Michael Bloomberg would seem to have zero appeal in a Democratic Party where progressive populism is on the rise and activists and elites say it’s time for a woman or a person of color to win the White House

 

...

 

No successful presidential campaign has ever been anchored to those issues. But the politics surrounding climate change and gun control have changed dramatically in recent years, and nowhere more than in the Democratic Party.

 

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, Meplat said:

 Walt...

That article was really, just shit.  Some semifunctional moron was paid to write that drivel.

 

Please tell me you posted it as a joke.

Well, yes.  After Bele posted something about Trump and "beautiful", I just googled the two words and posted whatever article showed up.  Anyhow, Trump does like to call things beautiful.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, Walter_Sobchak said:

Well, yes.  After Bele posted something about Trump and "beautiful", I just googled the two words and posted whatever article showed up.  Anyhow, Trump does like to call things beautiful.

 

So do most humans.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, Sturgeon said:

 

So do most humans.

I prefer "Special"..

Because it can be used in a less than nice manner, but still sound nice.

Example-

"What do you think of my car?"

"Well, it sure is Special."

 

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Meplat said:

I prefer "Special"..

Because it can be used in a less than nice manner, but still sound nice.

Example-

"What do you think of my car?"

"Well, it sure is Special."

 

 

 

 

 

.38 Special?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

https://thehill.com/opinion/white-house/426464-how-the-clinton-machine-flooded-the-fbi-with-trump-russia-dirt-until?amp&__twitter_impression=true

 



When at first you don't succeed, try, try again. That's what Hillary Clinton's machine did in 2016, eventually getting the FBI to bite on an uncorroborated narrative that Donald Trump and Russia were trying to hijack the presidential election.

Between July and October 2016, Clinton-connected lawyers, emissaries and apologists made more than a half-dozen overtures to U.S. officials, each tapping a political connection to get suspect evidence into FBI counterintelligence agents' hands, according to internal documents and testimonies I reviewed and interviews I conducted.

In each situation, the overture was uninvited. And as the election drew closer, the point of contact moved higher up the FBI chain.

It was, as one of my own FBI sources called it, a "classic case of information saturation" designed to inject political opposition research into a counterintelligence machinery that should have suspected a political dirty trick was underway.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So this guy claims to have a copy of Chief Baby Boomer Banging Drum Loudly's military DD 214 showing that he wasn't a Vietnam War veteran and was in fact a refrigerator mechanic in the Corp, never leaving stateside and who was discharged after 4 years at the rank of private with three AWOLs.

 

 

 

airrc2i.png

 

uHVOxfH.png

 

ndRZlwu.png

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 hours ago, Donward said:

So this guy claims to have a copy of Chief Baby Boomer Banging Drum Loudly's military DD 214 showing that he wasn't a Vietnam War veteran and was in fact a refrigerator mechanic in the Corp, never leaving stateside and who was discharged after 4 years at the rank of private with three AWOLs.

 

 

 

airrc2i.png

 

uHVOxfH.png

 

ndRZlwu.png

 

If Don Shipley has it, it's probably legit.

 

Also, the lack of response by folks calling for those kid's heads has been "as expected".

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, Sgt.Squarehead said:

I reckon they're angling for another tax-cut (or summat).  ;)

 

 

You can't imagine that the good people at Forbes would say something nice about someone else unless they thought they could get something out of it?

Well... you're probably right about that.

 

With every passing day, I am more and more surprised that Trump has somehow figured out how to control the Republicans in congress.  I would expect them to be the first point of weakness in any sort of standoff like this shutdown.  Presumably he is employing blocking detachments in order to keep them from retreating.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, Collimatrix said:

Presumably he is employing blocking detachments in order to keep them from retreating.


Further evidence (if one accepts the ridiculous proposition that more is needed) that the Red side of American politics are carefully disguised Stalinists conducting a deep infiltration Maskirovka as part of the first echelon of forces under Tukhachevsky's theory of deep operations. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Similar Content

    • By Oedipus Wreckx-n-Effect
      After seeing the rampant crack down on speech in the UK, I decided that more should be done than just Thoughts and Prayers. 
       
      I know that it's a scary time for our UK members. Knowing that what you say on the internet can put you on the wrong side of a Bobby's nightstick, well, I find that despicable. 
       
      So I've created this place for all your impure or degenerate thoughts. Here's how it works. 
       
      Perhaps you want to say something "offensive". Instead of saying it yourself, you can message any US member of this forum and have them act as your avatar of avarice. 
       
      For example, say you had a particularly heinous fish and chips at the local pub. You may want to say, "Oi, that cheeky fucker Barnaby William can't do a proper chip if he had a fryer for hands!"
       
      This on it's own could send you straight to jail for defamation. Moreso, if instead of chips that sent you reeling it happened to be a kebab from Omar down the street. 
       
      Now your crime has gone from offensive to racially insensitive!
       
      Anytime such an urge comes along, call on your ex colonial friends. We will translate and post your complaint for all the world to revel in, free of charge!
       
      I personally think Omar should learn to pull the fucking kebab off heat before it's crisper than his wife's crotch and blacker than his beard. That tosser!
       
      See? Don't you feel better? And now, no one will be knocking on your door, serving you with a summons for being a racist git. 
       
    • By T___A
      Might as well make a new thread now that the election is over.
    • By Tied
      Yes
       
      i personally support it, by finding the KGB Felix Dzerzhinsky greatly improved state scurrility both inside the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics and abroad (their jurisdiction was only domestic, but they kept the internationally influential people safe at night)   a dedicated defender of both the Revolution and all the Soviet peoples     what do you think of this news?
×
×
  • Create New...