Jump to content
Sturgeon's House
T___A

US Politics Thread: Year 2 of 1000 of the TrumpenReich

Recommended Posts

A copypaste tl:dr of Barr's Senate testimony;

 

>no evidence for colussion
>president has absolute right to fire comey's position and to fire muellers special council position 
>POTUS did NOT tell mcghan to tell rod rosentein to fire mueller, POTUS told mcghan to tell rod rosenstein to replace mueller on the grounds of conflict of interest bc mueller is great friends with comey and that mueller had previous expressed interest in replacing comey's position and taking his job
>feinstein said "what is that is just fake", barr explained that mueller's report explicitly shows that trump genuinely believed the that investigation was a political motivated witch hunt so on those grounds of genuine belief of wrong doin on behalf of the investigation trump could have asked him to be replaced, anyway. feinstein agreed that is the law
>Barr is concerned about the reason why the investigation took place and looking into these things and the conduct of 2016 after looking through the mueller report to prove what he did and did not already do
>barr said that he has already begun multiple ongoing felony leak investigation regarding the fbi leaks to the press about the hillary email scandal and the russian meddling investigation

>barr doesnt know why mueller didnt make a decision on whether there was obstruction or not, which breaks tradition since muellers one job was to do that bc he had the power of the DOJ in order to do the investigation
>mueller clarified that he didnt like how the press read into the report
>barr gave a statement about the findings in the report with NO summary and just stated the facts/findings bc mueller gave no report and refused to remove the names of people involved in investigations so as to protect their identity
>bc of that info barr had to redact it on his own so he made a statement of the facts of the report so that the public wouldnt flip shit until the report was released
>the total amount redacted was less then 2% on volum 1 and 1% in volume 2, in the congressional level report less then 1/10th of 1% is redacted

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
20 minutes ago, Ramlaen said:

A copypaste tl:dr of Barr's Senate testimony;

 

>no evidence for colussion
>president has absolute right to fire comey's position and to fire muellers special council position 
>POTUS did NOT tell mcghan to tell rod rosentein to fire mueller, POTUS told mcghan to tell rod rosenstein to replace mueller on the grounds of conflict of interest bc mueller is great friends with comey and that mueller had previous expressed interest in replacing comey's position and taking his job
>feinstein said "what is that is just fake", barr explained that mueller's report explicitly shows that trump genuinely believed the that investigation was a political motivated witch hunt so on those grounds of genuine belief of wrong doin on behalf of the investigation trump could have asked him to be replaced, anyway. feinstein agreed that is the law
>Barr is concerned about the reason why the investigation took place and looking into these things and the conduct of 2016 after looking through the mueller report to prove what he did and did not already do
>barr said that he has already begun multiple ongoing felony leak investigation regarding the fbi leaks to the press about the hillary email scandal and the russian meddling investigation

>barr doesnt know why mueller didnt make a decision on whether there was obstruction or not, which breaks tradition since muellers one job was to do that bc he had the power of the DOJ in order to do the investigation
>mueller clarified that he didnt like how the press read into the report
>barr gave a statement about the findings in the report with NO summary and just stated the facts/findings bc mueller gave no report and refused to remove the names of people involved in investigations so as to protect their identity
>bc of that info barr had to redact it on his own so he made a statement of the facts of the report so that the public wouldnt flip shit until the report was released
>the total amount redacted was less then 2% on volum 1 and 1% in volume 2, in the congressional level report less then 1/10th of 1% is redacted

 

So this really just made the democrats look stupid?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

According to Politico there was some odd activity when Papadopoulos was arrested;

"Papadopoulos' arrest seems to have been the product of some haste. Indeed, when he was arrested at Dulles Airport on July 27 after coming off a flight from Munich, prosecutors had no warrant for him and no indictment or criminal complaint. The complaint would be filed the following morning and approved by Howell in Washington.

And when prosecutors filed the complaint the next day they got a spoken order from Howell to seal it, but followed up with a written request that they could take to the magistrate in Alexandria, where they showed up almost an hour later than she expected.

All of it suggests something of a scramble, rather than a carefully prepared plan to take Papadopolous into custody."

 

Could it be there was no "warrant, indictment or criminal complaint" because the intended reason to arrest Papadopolous fell through? Well lets take a look at some other things, new and old, that we know.

 

June 8, 2017.
-While in Israel, Papadopoulos is given $10k in cash by a man named Charles Tawil as a retainer for a fuel company that operates in the Middle East and Africa.
-Based on material on wikileaks, Tawil is a CIA informant.

 

June 9, 2017
-According to his book, Papadopoulos and his wife fly with Tawil to Cyprus.

 

June 13, 2017
-According to a recent FOIA release of his schedule, Andrew Weissmann (head of the DOJ's fraud section) makes a call to the Money Laundering and Asset Recovery department of the FBI and begins having Cyprus Mutual Legal Assistance Treaty meetings.

 

July 27, 2017
-Papadopoulos flies back to the US without the $10k cash and is arrested before he arrives at customs.

Bringing $10k cash into the US and not declaring it would result in civil/criminal penalties.

 

I will let you be the judge.

 

On a side note, Papadopolous claims he was given the choice of taking a plea deal or face charges of being an unregistered agent of Israel (FARA).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Funny stuff, Durham has a great experience in handling cases against agent's of different kind, there was also a case on FBI agents who helped the Boston gangster James "Whitey" Bulger.

 

Guess who was the attorney and watching over the local FBI? Robert Mueller, right at the time of investigation on Bulger. Mueller became the director of FBI and probably, the investigators were not allowed to touch him after that.

 

Shock and awe! Bulger died last year under very strange circumstances, doesn't look at all like a cleaning job for the upcoming investigation on Mueller.

 

Also another note, Bulger's nephew was in cahoots with Biden family in the murky China affairs.

 

Referring to the investment deal with the State Bank of China at the same time that Vice President Joe Biden led diplomatic negotiations in Beijing with the leadership of the PRC.

 

China was buying Joe trough Hunter, because the timing of deals and meetings were in such good timing.

 

Hunter also made a great deal of money in Ukraine trough Burisma, after he was retired in disgrace from the US Navy because of cocaine addiction.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Similar Content

    • By Oedipus Wreckx-n-Effect
      After seeing the rampant crack down on speech in the UK, I decided that more should be done than just Thoughts and Prayers. 
       
      I know that it's a scary time for our UK members. Knowing that what you say on the internet can put you on the wrong side of a Bobby's nightstick, well, I find that despicable. 
       
      So I've created this place for all your impure or degenerate thoughts. Here's how it works. 
       
      Perhaps you want to say something "offensive". Instead of saying it yourself, you can message any US member of this forum and have them act as your avatar of avarice. 
       
      For example, say you had a particularly heinous fish and chips at the local pub. You may want to say, "Oi, that cheeky fucker Barnaby William can't do a proper chip if he had a fryer for hands!"
       
      This on it's own could send you straight to jail for defamation. Moreso, if instead of chips that sent you reeling it happened to be a kebab from Omar down the street. 
       
      Now your crime has gone from offensive to racially insensitive!
       
      Anytime such an urge comes along, call on your ex colonial friends. We will translate and post your complaint for all the world to revel in, free of charge!
       
      I personally think Omar should learn to pull the fucking kebab off heat before it's crisper than his wife's crotch and blacker than his beard. That tosser!
       
      See? Don't you feel better? And now, no one will be knocking on your door, serving you with a summons for being a racist git. 
       
    • By T___A
      Might as well make a new thread now that the election is over.
    • By Tied
      Yes
       
      i personally support it, by finding the KGB Felix Dzerzhinsky greatly improved state scurrility both inside the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics and abroad (their jurisdiction was only domestic, but they kept the internationally influential people safe at night)   a dedicated defender of both the Revolution and all the Soviet peoples     what do you think of this news?
×
×
  • Create New...