Jump to content
Sturgeon's House

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 542
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Restricted: for Operating Thetan Eyes Only By order of Her Gracious and Serene Majesty Queen Diane Feinstein the VIII The Dianetic People’s Republic of California Anno Domini 2250

Comrades! The time of your waiting is over! I introduce to you the Sierra Nevada VagonZavod AFV-50 Gun Tank   Frontal Dimensions Frontal Armor Turret Cheek Armor Array (n

Report from Lt. Col. [REDACTED] People's Auditory Forces Directorate of Political-Moral Reliability, Auditory and Political Officer for SNVZ and Military-Industry Liaison Officer for RFP "New Battle T

3 minutes ago, Zadlo said:

But why

Because the DPRC's high end AlO production is allocated to aircraft, LAV and personal body armor and not for tanks; the sheer quantity needed for large AFV production exceeds reasonable production capacities.

At the same time, performance is not expected to reasonably exceed that of fused silica against the reference threats.

6 minutes ago, Zadlo said:

On the one hand you allow to use fused silica but on the other hand you can't allow to use granite balls which were first used in armor in mid-50s!

Fused silica is in effect just very pure glass, easy to mass-produce. It has also seen use in armor since the early 1950s; it is assessed as offering similar performance at significantly lower costs vs the existing threats compared to more esoteric solutions such as granite, which is therefore disqualified on cost grounds.

 

19 minutes ago, Zadlo said:

I think the competition is a bit broken.

Such Suppressive Personship is the sign of a Reactive Mind. Hatethink like this may get your Operating Thetan clearance revoked and you audited for sedition.

 

On a more serious note, you're invited to, y'know, actually participate before complaining about the rules.

Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, holoween said:

You just calculated 10° from vertical. So K2 is about 155mm

 

 

 

You're right, my bad.  But with NLM's clarification about only the steel part of the reactive armor array contributing to the K2, then it's actually only about 103mm.

 

As soon as we know the formula for K1 we can figure out what the highest ratio of cosine(theta)/K1 is.  That should give us the best efficiency.

 

EDIT:

for instance, the ratio of the secant of 80 degrees over the secant of 70 degrees is 1.96.  Eyeballing the K1 chart, the effect at those slopes is about 3.5 and 2 respectively.  3.5/2 is only 1.75, so the increase in the effectiveness of the array is not offset by the increase in areal density.

 

 

EDIT EDIT:  That's the reciprocal of the cosine of the Greek letter theta, not the act of attempting to take out a loan from the Dianetic People's Bank by having your thetan co-sign.

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Zadlo said:

 

It's not everything about that there.

Sometimes even NERA need some thick back-up.

 

And this has still existed.

46482363_199725304252345_142978987978443

Congrats, you found a patent.

 

Here's one for an interplanetary fusion-powered spacecraft:

https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/originalDocument?CC=WO&NR=2018231310A2&KC=A2&FT=D&ND=3&date=20181220&DB=&locale=en_EP#

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Toxn said:

Congrats, you found a patent.

 

Here's one for an interplanetary fusion-powered spacecraft:

https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/originalDocument?CC=WO&NR=2018231310A2&KC=A2&FT=D&ND=3&date=20181220&DB=&locale=en_EP#

 

Congrats that you can use patent search engine. Because I doubt you've ever learned any other advanced abilities above that.

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Donward said:

It sounds like someone doesn’t understand the spirit of the contest and needs to be sent to the Glorious Agriculture Camps in the Mojave Reclamation Zone for further spiritual enlightenment.

My vote is for a long holiday with a Voluntary Body Thetan Removal brigade.

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Lord_James said:

Oh please dear lord, do not let this turn into another insult contest. 

 

I don't want but some people think that are righter and put some other people on too high on the pedestal while threating other ones who want to do the same. I only asked about using ceramics in a tank more advanced than fused silica and known in 1961.

 

I may disagree with the rules but I have to accept them. I haven't ended my tanks in the previous contest but now I have more time and materials to do it.

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Zadlo said:

Because I doubt you've ever learned any other advanced abilities above that.

...you do realize Toxn was one of the winners of the last competition, right?

 

Again, you're strongly encouraged to chill and face the fact that A. You were wrong about Chobham and B. You're gonna have to live without advanced ceramics in this competition.

If you can't cope with B you can freely leave the thread and if you can't cope with A this may be the wrong site for you.

Link to post
Share on other sites
15 hours ago, N-L-M said:

How do you propose to have a vehicle without a hull?

Imagine a BV206, only that everything can rotate 360 degrees.  Like a excavator. 
Because I am sure our superior drivers can cope with the sudden rotation of his workstation and sometimes complete lack of vision while guiding his vehicle through narrow mountain roads. No less should be expected. 

 

In a way, the vehicle would be a turret on tracks. Kinda like this:
Chrysler-TV-8-military-tank.jpg

 

Also, welcome Zadlo to the forum and this GLORIES competition, I am looking forward to your great contribution to the greater good. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Xoon said:

 In a way, the vehicle would be a turret on tracks

Everything below the ring that connects it to the track is the hull; I am however willing to make a broad exception:

In the cases in which the hull or turret are over 75% of the silhouette, the aim point is shifted to the centroid of the large body instead of the center of the turret ring. The spec includes what distance from the aim point needs to be protected, and those instructions are to be followed.

 

I believe that should cover that.

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Zadlo said:

 

I may disagree with the rules but I have to accept them.

Yep:

Rule 1 - the customer is always right.

Rule 2 - if the customer appears to be wrong, refer to rule 1

 

So, we have to offer the best solution within the bounds, let the games begin!

Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, Zadlo said:

 

I don't want but some people think that are righter and put some other people on too high on the pedestal while threating other ones who want to do the same. I only asked about using ceramics in a tank more advanced than fused silica and known in 1961.

 

I may disagree with the rules but I have to accept them. I haven't ended my tanks in the previous contest but now I have more time and materials to do it.

 

You're a fucking retard and need a dick-slappin'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

So, where is my design heading?

1. First pass - working up from the required lethality, making some assumptions around mobility.

2. Basic config and style chosen - forward turret, rear powerpack

3. Set turret size - how many crew, where is the ammo etc

4. What physical size and non-armour mass results

5 What armour mass is required to get acceptable protection

6 What is new total mass and size - do prior assumption still work?

6 Rinse and repeat until time runs out or acceptable outcome.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, Xoon said:

 

In a way, the vehicle would be a turret on tracks. Kinda like this:
Chrysler-TV-8-military-tank.jpg

 

That is going to need one hell of a traverse drive.  Probably consume more power that required for mobility.  And if the powerpack is in the turret ( the frigging enormous powerpack) then drive to the tracks is hydraulic or electric?  Hydraulic has such poor efficiency that the powerpack would go from frigging enormous to double frigging enormous.  If electric, bear in mind that we don't have fancy electronics so no brushless high efficiency stuff and even brushed stuff will have to use old school magnetic materials - no fancy rare earths..  Then there is CoG height and cross slope stability etc.  But, it would be cool if you can make it work :)

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • N-L-M unfeatured this topic

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Similar Content

    • By SH_MM
      Found a few higher resolution photographs from the recent North Korean military parade. We didn't have a topic for BEST KOREAN armored fighting vehicles, so here it is.
       
      New main battle tank, Abrams-Armata clone based on Ch'ŏnma turret design (welded, box-shaped turret) and Sŏn'gun hull design (i.e. centerline driver's position). The bolts of the armor on the hull front is finally visible given the increased resolution. It might not be ERA given the lack of lines inbetween. Maybe is a NERA module akin to the MEXAS hull add-on armor for the Leopard 2A5?
       
      Other details include an APS with four radar panels (the side-mounted radar panels look a lot different - and a lot more real - than the ones mounted at the turret corners) and twelve countermeasures in four banks (two banks à three launchers each at the turret front, two banks à three launchers on the left and right side of the turret). Thermal imagers for gunner and commander, meteorological mast, two laser warning receivers, 115 mm smoothbore gun without thermal sleeve but with muzze reference system, 30 mm grenade launcher on the turret, six smoke grenade dischargers (three at each turret rear corner)
       


       
      IMO the layout of the roof-mounted ERA is really odd. Either the armor array covering the left turret cheek is significantly thinner than the armor on the right turret cheek or the roof-mounted ERA overlaps with the armor.
       


      The first ERA/armor element of the skirt is connected by hinges and can probably swivel to allow better access to the track. There is a cut-out in the slat armor for the engine exhaust. Also note the actual turret ring - very small diameter compared to the outer dimensions of the turret.
       
      Stryker MGS copy with D-30 field gun clone and mid engine:

      Note there are four crew hatches. Driver (on the left front of the vehicle), commander (on the right front of the vehicle, seat is placed a bit further back), gunner (left side of the gun's overhead mount, next to the gunner's sight) and unknown crew member (right side of gun's overhead mount with 30 mm automatic grenade launcher mounted at the hatch). The vehicle also has a thermal imager and laser rangefinder (gunner's sight is identical to the new tank), but no independent optic for the commander. It also has the same meteorological mast and laser warner receivers as the new MBT.
       
      What is the purpose of the fourth crew member? He cannot realistically load the gun...
       
      The vehicle has a small trim vane for swimming, the side armor is made of very thin spaced steel that is bend on multiple spots, so it clearly is not ceramic armor as fitted to the actual Stryker.

       
      The tank destroyer variant of the same Stryker MGS copy fitted with a Bulsae-3 ATGM launcher.
       

      Note that there is again a third hatch with 30 mm automatic grenade launcher behind the commander's position. Laser warning receivers and trime vane are again stand-out features. The sighting complex for the Bulsae-3 ATGMs is different with a large circular optic (fitted with cover) probably being a thermal imager and two smaller lenses visible on the very right (as seen from the vehicle's point of view) probably containing a day sight and parts of the guidance system.
       

      Non line-of-sight ATGM carrier based on the 6x6 local variant of the BTR, again fitted with laser warning receivers and a trim vane. There are only two hatches and two windows, but there is a three men crew inside.
       
       
      There are a lot more photos here, but most of them are infantry of missile system (MLRS' and ICBMs).
    • By Toxn
      You are an engineer at an Italian locomotive and tractor-making company in early 1943. The writing is on the wall for the Italian army in North Africa, with a lot of equipment having been lost and the enemy on the brink of kicking the axis out of Tunisia and then heading across the Mediterranean. In short, things are looking more than a little desperate. 
       
      However, all is not lost. Il Duce himself has stepped in and, with the assistance of the Germans, procured both some of their finest captured vehicles for use in the upcoming defense of the homeland. Since many of these vehicles have been... gently used, and the existing firms like Ansaldo are flooded with orders, your firm has been asked to work on them in order to bring them up to the standards demanded by modern warfare. 
       
      In addition to these vehicles, the Germans have also graciously agreed to sell weapons from their existing stock of captured equipment, as well as providing production licenses for some of their more modern equipment. You have also been given permission to work with local weapons manufacturers in order to modify existing artillery to suit your needs. Italian automotive and engine manufacturers are similarly available to help. Finally; your firm's experience in locomotives and tractors means that you can modify hulls and put together turrets and turret rings. You can also produce castings (although not very large ones) and weld armour plates.
       
      Your job, which you have no choice but to accept, is to choose a vehicle from among the captured stock being offered for sale, and propose a series of plausible fixes in order to give it a fighting chance against the American and British equipment currently in the field (specifically light tanks and light anti-tank weapons).
       
      It is not foreseen that any of these vehicles will be able to plausibly take on modern medium or heavy designs head-on. Instead, what is wanted are general, implementable improvements to the characteristics of the chosen vehicle. These improvements should be aimed at making these vehicles more useful in the initial battles which are foreseen taking place against airborne and landing forces, in general cooperation with infantry, and as scouts.
       
      The submission should include one or more drawings or blueprints (at least a side view of the vehicle, but preferably a 3-point view and isometric view), a description of the modified vehicle, a description of how the modifications would be accomplished and a description of how the modifications would improve the design overall. The text of the submission should short and descriptive rather than long and exhaustive, and should not exceed 1000 words in total. Images may be photoshopped using existing pictures.
       
      Judging will be done on the basis of plausibility and effectiveness, with innovative solutions being encouraged in order to get the most bang for buck out of the base vehicle. Beyond implementation, the fixes should prioritise combat effectiveness while also improving reliability, crew ergonomics, communication, mobility and protection as much as possible.
       
      The foreign vehicles available for modification are:
      Renault R35 (already in service) Hotchkiss H35/39 Somua S35 (already in use for training purposes) T-26 BT-5 T-28 (only available in very small numbers, so need to be extremely effective) Panzer II Ausf.C  
      The foreign weapons immediately available for purchase are:
      15mm ZB-60 25mm Puteaux and Hotchkiss 3.7cm KPÚV vz. 34/Pak 34 (t) 3.7cm ÚV vz. 38/KwK 38(t)
      3.7cm Pak 36 4.0 cm Pak 192 (e) 45mm M1937 (53-K) 4.7cm KPÚV vz. 38/Pak 38 (t) 47mm APX 7.5cm Pak 97/38 7.62 cm F.K.297(r) and  7.62 cm PaK 39(r) 8.8cm Raketenwerfer 43  
      Licenses are also available for the manufacture of foreign engines (Maybach HL62 TRM, Maybach HL120 TRM and Praga Typ TNHPS/II), periscopes, sights, radios, cupolas and automotive subassemblies. All foreign vehicle weapons, subassemblies and components are available for reverse engineering and manufacture.
       
      IMPORTANT NOTE: This competition hasn't been finalised, and is waiting on your input! Vote to participate by giving this topic a 'controversial' (grapefruit-induced tears being the only currency of value), and if we get enough participants we'll pull the trigger. Ask any questions you want below, and when/if the competition goes forwards I will make a new thread for entries.
       
      Edit: thanks to excellent feedback, the competition proposal has been somewhat edited. If you want an idea of what my mindset is here, read up on the battle of Gela (bearing in mind that the wikipedia entry is shite) and ask how much better the counter-attack could have gone if the Italian vehicles had been equipped with radios and had the ability to move faster than jogging speed.
       
      Edit 2: since I failed to mention this above - this is not a one-man, one-entry sort of competition (although I'm not keen on the ten-men, one entry approach either).
      If you have two good ideas then you can submit twice. The only rules are not to test my patience and to keep it within the bounds of good taste.
    • By Toxn
      This is the competition entry thread.
       
      Please submit your complete entries here (all entries will be judged complete when judging begins in the first week of November) and keep the other competition thread for discussion and chatter.
       
      Once judging is complete I will make a post here to discuss the entries and announce a winner.
       
      Best of luck!
    • By Toxn
      So I got a request recently from {NAME REDACTED} as to whether we have a how-to guide or something for competitions. After a few moments of bitter, bitter laughter at the decade-plus of my life that I've spent cobbling together things that can maybe, sort-of, squint-your-eyes produce a facsimile of a realistic vehicle, I thought I'd share my process:
       
       
      Note: I was half-right - we definitely have supplementary info for aspiring pretend tank designers pinned to this very board.
       
      Finally, I'm inviting our forum grognards and past winners to share their process for folk that haven't been here since before the last ice age, so that all can benefit.

×
×
  • Create New...