Jump to content
Sturgeon's House
Sign in to follow this  
Toxn

The Book review thread

Recommended Posts

I think there may be an older version of this thread somewhere, but if so it's buried.

 

Post short reviews of books you've read recently, along with any particular points of interest that may be pertinent to the other denizens of this forum.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Kicking off; I've been on a dead tree media binge the last few months, as I've given up on kindle.

 

My current bedside table book list is:

  • The great leveller (Walter Scheidel)
  • Utopia of Rules (David Graeber)
  • Other Minds: The Octopus, the Sea, and the Deep Origins of Consciousness (Peter Godfrey-Smith)
  • Ring of steel (Alexander Watson)
  • 1177 BC: the year civilization collapsed  (Eric H Cline)
  • Oathbringer (Brandon Sanderson)
  • War and peace and war - Peter Turchin
  • Egg & Spoon (Gregory Maguire)
  • Grace of Kings (Ken Liu)

So far I've read up to Oathbringer (which is good, but has the typical issue of needing to have read all the books before it to get all the value out).

 

Edit: I'll post little reviews of the above more or less at random going forwards.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Right, first up:

 

Ring of Steel (Alexander Watson)

 

This book barely needs a review. It's great; the writing is solid, the level of historical research is good, the subject is interesting and under-served and it's won a bazillion awards.

The only thing I can really add is that seeing and comparng the German and Austro-hungarian experiences of the first world war graphically illustrates the difference on every level between a rising and falling power. Even when the Austro-hungarians are doing exactly what the Germans are doing, they seem to end up mired in factional squabbling and waste.

 

I give it one nail-coated statue of Hindenburg out of ten and demand that you get it, read it, add it to your 'understanding WW1 as the cause of the 20th century' collection.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Grace of Kings (Ken Liu)

 

This is an interesting one. I quite liked it despite the fact that the prose is rather flat, that significant plot points revolve around technical things (man-powered ornithopters, manually rowed battle blimps etc.) that are usually guaranteed to set of my gigantic pedant sense, that it involves lots of up-front made-up cosmology and gods (which unfailingly bores me) and that the author indulges in ass-pulls on the regular to resolve plot issues. I guess this just goes to show that well-written, memorable characters and decent, personal conflict-driven plot really can salve any wound.

 

 I give it one intricately-carved jade statue of a fantasy whale out of ten, and you should buy it and read it before the author is up to book 3 and you're having to jump in late. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

1177 BC: the year civilization collapsed (Eric H Cline)

 

This one was a bit of a disappointment. I bought it after watching a very good lecure on YouTube by the author on the same subject, and was hoping for the book to be an expanded, more detailed version of the same. And it is. But it's also rather badly written, has a terrible habit of stating the same point at least three times per chapter, and continuously gets in its own way by trying to link everything to a trite analogy to the turmoil in the middle east circa 2015.

 

I give it a sunken ship full of treasures from across the mediterranean out of ten, and recommend that you look for the YouTube video instead. I also recommend that you get someone to laser-cut the Medinet Habu relief depicting the battle against the sea peoples onto a massive basalt slab and put it up in the massive sitting room of your Frank Lloyd Wright-inspired modernist mansion, but that's beside the point.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The great leveller (Walter Scheidel)

 

This book represents something of a catch-22, in that I think it needed the impetus of the last decade's worth of economic misery to become immediately important to the reader, but also that if it had come out in 2007 instead of 2017 it would be much more well known than it is at present. Which is funny, because the book is about the catch-22 of inescapably-increasing inequality only being solved by massive structural violence. As it stands, this is the book that should have become the "Guns, Germs and Steel" of our time but will instead be remembered more like "Cows, Pigs, Wars and Witches".

 

I give it a 30 years war our of ten, and think everyone should read it just so that they can feel as hopeless and sad about the state of the world as me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Other Minds: The Octopus, the Sea, and the Deep Origins of Consciousness (Peter Godfrey-Smith)

 

This book is part into-to-evolutionary-theory-and-cladistics, part discussion of octopus evolution and biology, part intro to philosophy and part memoirs of a dude's diving trips. Aside from the first part (which I found trite due to my background), all of the parts were competently executed and well-written. But then I really like cephalopods, so I'm an easy lay for this sort of thing.

 

I give the book a diffuse central nervous system where the limbs have more neurons than the brain out of ten, and ask that everyone just love octopus, cuttlefish and squid for keeping it together in their short, frantic lives. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Utopia of Rules (David Graeber)

 

This is one of those books that I think will be loved for the wrong reasons, and hated by people who could find surprising value in it. The author is a caricature of a very specific type of lefty academic but writes fantastically, and the book is slim enough so that it doesn't wear its welcome out too much even if you can't stand the use of the interpretive turn and other critical theory concepts.

 

I give it a well-written analysis turning on the idea that frankenstein represents the idea of absolution of responsibility and so innoculates the male reader into accepting their role as patriarch out of ten, and suggest giving it as a gift to someone to create an unspoken debt obligation which will eventually result in them sharing half of their meagre rations with you during the aching-winter of 2051.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Oathbringer (Brandon Sanderson)

 

This is another one for which there really isn't much to say. If you've read all the books so far you're going to read this one. If you haven't, then trying to pick this up will be baffling as you work through the effects of two doorstoppers-worth of backstory, character development, worldbuilding etc. It's the familiar problem of long-running fantasy series, for which not much can be done. In any case, I read it so obviously I'm on board with this series and am hungrily waiting for the next book to come out so that I can tear through it and see if my favourite character developed any more wonky superpowers and/or stopped moping for five fucking seconds.

 

I give it a cremling crawling into a crack (its tiny gemheart fluttering) to hide from the everstorm, as a nearby radiant uses the powers of stormlight to surgebind out of ten, and have no advice for you in regards to your purchasing choices.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

  • Similar Content

    • By OnlySlightlyCrazy
      The full title of this work is "Weaponeering - Conventional Weapon System Effectiveness" by Morris Driels, who teaches at the USN Postgraduate School, and the cover of the edition I have in hand can be seen below.


       
      The book aims to "describe and quantify the methods commonly used to predict the probably of successfully attacking ground targets using air-launched or ground-launched weapons", including "the various methodologies utilized in operational products used widely in the [US military]." Essentially, this boils down to a series of statistical methods to calculate Pk and Ph for various weapons and engagements. 

      The author gave the book to my mother, who was a coworker of his at the time, and is of the opinion that Driels is not as smart as he perceives himself to be. But, hey, it's worth a review for friends.

      I will unfortunately be quite busy in the next few days, but I have enough spare time tonight to begin a small review of a chapter. I aim to eventually get a full review of the piece done.

      Our dear friends @Collimatrix and @N-L-M requested specifically chapter 15 covering mines, and chapter 16 covering target acquisition.

      Chapter 15
      Mines

      The mine section covers both land mines and sea mines, and is split roughly in twain along these lines.

      The land mine section begins with roughly a page of technical description of AT vs AP, M-Kill vs K-Kill, and lists common US FAmily of SCatterably Mines (FASCAM) systems. The section includes decent representative diagrams. The chapter then proceeds to discuss the specification and planning of minefields, beginning with the mean effective diameter of a mine. Driels discusses a simplified minefield method based on mine density, and then a detailed method.

      The simplified method expresses the effectiveness of the minefield as a density value. Diels derives for the release of unitary mines from aircraft

      NMines = Fractional coverage in range * fractional coverage in deflection * number of mines released per pass * reliability * number of passes

      and for cluster type

      NMines = FRange * FDefl * NDispensers * Reliability dispenser * NMines per Dispenser * Reliability Submunition * number of passes

      and then exploits the evident geometry to express the Area and Frontal densities. Most useful is the table of suggested minefield densities for Area Denial Artillery Munition and Remote Anti-Armor Mine System, giving the Area and Linear densities required to Disrupt, Turn, Fix, and Block an opponent. 


      Whereas the simplistic method expresses effectiveness as a density, the detailed model views the targets and mines individually, assuming the targets are driving directly through the minefield perpendicular to the width and that there is only one casualty and no sympathetic detonations per detonation. The model computes the expected number of targets destroyed by the minefield, beginning with the Mean Effective Diameter and the PEncounter based on distance from the mine. 

      Driels derives the number of mines encountered which will be encountered, not avoided, and will engage the target. I can't be arsed to type the equations in full, so here you go.



      The section concludes with an example calculation using the detailed mine method. Overall, this shows the strengths and weaknesses of the book fairly well - it is a reasonable derivation of open-source statistical methods for predicting Pk and Ph and the number of sorties required, but US-specific and limited in scope and depth. 

      The treatment of Sea Mines  begins by describing the various types and uses of said mines, importantly noting that they have both defensive and offensive uses, and that the presence of the threat of mines is equally important as the actual sinking which occurs. There are three classifications of sea mines, contact, influence, and controlled.

      Shallow water mines are treated trivially, considering them equivalent to land mines with Blast Diameter in the place of MED, and assuming that the mines cannot be avoided.

      Deep water mines are approached in a similar manner, with the desire to determine the number of mines needed to achieve the required probability of damage, and planning missions from there. Two features of sea mines must be considered, however - mine actuation by passing of the target, and mine damage to the target. The probability of activation is, unfortunately, dependent on the depth of the mine and distance, forming a series of stacked bowls as below.


      The mean value of PActivation is the statistical expectation of the curve. Because I don't feel like screencapping another equation, the Width of Seaway where an actuation can occur is qualitatively merely the area under the actuation curve calculated for a specific mine and target combo.

      The damage function is also of interest - because we require the mine to both actuate and damage the target, this limits our earlier area under the curve to that area integrated to the limits of the damage function. The selection of mine sensitivity plays a very large role in the effectiveness of our mines. A high setting will lead to many more actuations than damages, which can be indicated by the ratio of the actuation area and the damage area from earlier. Setting the actuation distance equal to the damage distance means that every actuation causes damage, but the probability of actuation is only around 42%. The compromise which selects some Areadamage / Areaactuation of around .8 to .93 is generally preferred. This gives us several useful terms -
      PA+D = Reliability * Areadamage / Widthminefield . The probability that the first ship to transit a minefield is referred to as the threat, or
      Threat T = 1 - (1 - PA+D)^NMines = 1 - (1 - Reliability * Areadamage / Widthminefield ) which can obviously be solved for NMines to get the desired number of mines for a desired threat level.

      Anti-submarine mines are an interesting subset of deep sea mines, as they turn the problem from two-dimensions to three. Driels accounts for this by replacing the mine damage width with the mine damage area, to no one's surprise. Driels claims that the probability of actuation and damage is 

      PA/D =  Damage Area / (Width * Depth of minefield). Despite my initial confusion, the reliability term safely reappears in the threat definition below.

      T = 1 - (1 - (Reliability * Area damage)/(Width * Depth of minefield))^NMines, with a solution for number of mines for given threat level fairly easily taken out as before.

      Lastly, there is a summary of topics for each chapter, though unfortunately they are qualitative descriptions. Including the final derived equations in this part would be a major benefit, but is overlooked. Ah well. They are quite good for review or refreshing the material.

      As before, this is a relatively interesting if shallow engagement with the statistical methods to calculate Pk and Ph and the number of sorties required. Going more into detail regarding selecting Threat values or common (unclass) parameters would be interesting, but is lacking. Assuming I don't slack off tomorrow, I should have most or all of the Target Acquisition chapter covered.
×
×
  • Create New...