Jump to content
Please support this forum by joining the SH Patreon ×
Sturgeon's House

The M4 Sherman Tank Epic Information Thread.. (work in progress)


Recommended Posts

17 hours ago, Jeeps_Guns_Tanks said:

 

 

Wow, so I looked up Irzyk on Amazon, he has one book, called 'He rode up front for Patton', that is out of print and goes for big bucks, 300 to 700!

Irzyk is the guy that wrote up this defense of the Sherman tank right after WWII.  Its been available various places online and Zaloga included it in the appendices of his Patton VS the Panzers book.  He has also been in some of the crappy US TV documentaries.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Walter_Sobchak said:

Irzyk is the guy that wrote up this defense of the Sherman tank right after WWII.  Its been available various places online and Zaloga included it in the appendices of his Patton VS the Panzers book.  He has also been in some of the crappy US TV documentaries.

 

 

Oh yeah. It's one of my favorite sources to shut up sherman haters. I have a post about and it's on pdf on my downloads page.  I would love to meet him

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's an odd one.....I recall a discussion from the Missing Lynx modelling forum about a Sherman subtype with suspension fitted with spacers to allow the use of tracks with double-duckbills, like this:

 

100_6236.jpg

 

The site where I found the image attributes this as a M4A1 Flamethrower:  http://www.odfever.com/folly/Galleries/M4A1/M4A1.htm

 

 

Here's another picture of a different vehicle with the same spaced suspension & double-duckbills, but with a chevron track:

 

m4a1e6_2.jpg

 

This one is described as an M4A1E6 on this page:  http://the.shadock.free.fr/sherman_minutia/m4a3e4/m4a3e4.html  But the description doesn't mention the changes to the suspension.

 

Hoping you might know the designation for this type (pretty sure it was a M4A1 variant, E4 or E6 does ring some bells), maybe you have a section on it, I'd quite like to build one as a curiosity.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dammit, I stopped looking at E8.....I've seen stills of at least one of these tanks in action on ML, IIRC it was in US markings and had the Duckbills in situ, which was what drew attention to it in the first place (may have been an eBay find, there are a couple of guys there who specialise in trawling the site for pictures).  Sadly Photobucket utterly destroyed any realistic possibility of me finding it again in short order, if I happen upon it by chance you'll be the first to know. 

 

PS - Forgot to say cheers for the link, spot on, it has everything I should need, so.....Cheers!  :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Jeeps_Guns_Tanks said:

The A57 is really hard to find parts for on the USA.  I only know of two that run with the right motor.  Plus it looks like it has part of an m4a1 or m4 engine deck.

 

Well Jeeps, your theory was close.  I found the auction catalog from the Normandy D-day Museum sale, and it says this tank is an M4A4 with a Ford GAA engine.  http://issuu.com/artcurialbpt/docs/3114?e=6268161/12789934

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/14/2017 at 7:39 AM, Walter_Sobchak said:

 

Well Jeeps, your theory was close.  I found the auction catalog from the Normandy D-day Museum sale, and it says this tank is an M4A4 with a Ford GAA engine.  http://issuu.com/artcurialbpt/docs/3114?e=6268161/12789934

 

Interesting, a GAA is of course the best motor to swap in if you can get you mits on one. 

 

On 9/14/2017 at 8:09 AM, Walter_Sobchak said:

Hey Jeeps, was the T49 all metal track more common on UK Shermans?

 

Based only on picture evidence, I would say yes, but that was the prefered, or demanded track type for the Soviets too. You see it on some US tanks, but it seems pretty rare. The Brits also had some steel chevron type only they used commonly.  I think the T62. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

These are the latest Sherman drawings I've cleaned up. 

 

I'm working on the rest of the fuel system drawings, and will add a page dedicated to the M4s fuel system, starting with the M4A3. The Cupola drawing is the start of the drawings for the new upcoming turret page. 

 

I also have a ton of Corsair photos here. 

http://www.theshermantank.com/downloads-page-the-place-for-things-to-big-to-post-like-manuals/airplane-stuff/f4u-corsair-page-the-bent-wing-bird/

and a bunch of ship photos here,

http://www.theshermantank.com/downloads-page-the-place-for-things-to-big-to-post-like-manuals/airplane-stuff/f4u-corsair-page-the-bent-wing-bird/

 

Simply because I like ships and planes... 

Lt_Ira_Kepford_of_VF-17_returns_from_a_c

 

 

 

 

 

Engine-automatic-oil-filter-motor-explod

GAA-motor-mounts-improved-FLATT-1600x909

 

 

 

Fuel-shut-off-valve-control-exploded-vie

 

 

COMMANDERS-CUPOLA-7054771-ASSEMBLED-VIEW

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/12/2017 at 10:09 PM, Jeeps_Guns_Tanks said:

E9

 

They did cover it over on Sherman Minutia.  

 

http://the.shadock.free.fr/sherman_minutia/e9suspension/e9suspension.html

 

I'm not sure if they saw any combat in WWII. 

Hunnicutt's book also has info on them. Without digging mine out of storage I recall a mention of them being fitted to the "Jumbos" as well.

On 9/13/2017 at 10:23 PM, Walter_Sobchak said:

I saw one of these M4A3E9's earlier this summer in Eastern Ohio.

 

20170624_123026.jpg?w=700&h=

They look goofy as hell with "normal" tracks.

On 9/14/2017 at 10:01 AM, EnsignExpendable said:

Weird that the R957 was the one that survived the longer, all the British documents I find about it complain that it's hot garbage.

 

Considering the British track record with tank engines in WW2, that's actually pretty funny.  The '975 on a bad day was better than a lot of the garbage the Brits stuffed under armor, well into the 70's.  *Cough L60*.

 

On 9/17/2017 at 10:44 PM, Jeeps_Guns_Tanks said:

 

Interesting, a GAA is of course the best motor to swap in if you can get you mits on one. 

 

 

Rodders have discovered the GAA. IIRC there are a bunch of wacky one-off's built using the GAA as the mill.  It also was "rode hard and put away wet" too often. 

The 975 was a more primitive, but also more overbuilt engine than the GAA. A 975 will eat up abuse that would kill a GAA, and do it on one carb. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Meplat said:

Hunnicutt's book also has info on them. Without digging mine out of storage I recall a mention of them being fitted to the "Jumbos" as well.

They look goofy as hell with "normal" tracks.

 

Considering the British track record with tank engines in WW2, that's actually pretty funny.  The '975 on a bad day was better than a lot of the garbage the Brits stuffed under armor, well into the 70's.  *Cough L60*.

 

 

 

Rodders have discovered the GAA. IIRC there are a bunch of wacky one-off's built using the GAA as the mill.  It also was "rode hard and put away wet" too often. 

The 975 was a more primitive, but also more overbuilt engine than the GAA. A 975 will eat up abuse that would kill a GAA, and do it on one carb. 

 

 

Yeah, there is a guy in south America that has a GAA setup with a modern Ford ECM, turbos and fuel injection making 3000+ HP. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Jeeps_Guns_Tanks said:

 

 

Yeah, there is a guy in south America that has a GAA setup with a modern Ford ECM, turbos and fuel injection making 3000+ HP. 

Considering it's a 1000+CID mill at rest, with solid gear driven OH camshafts, in an absurdly underworked install, that is not shocking in the least. 

 

A GAA with a simple 6-71 blower  (all pre WW2 tech) would have yielded an easily produced and absurdly -powerful tank engine. 

 

Imagine early  North Africa  engagements, where late M3's and early M4's were leaving huge roostertails of dirt as  their supercharged GAA mills came to speed. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, the GAA was one bad ass mill, it had forged rods, with full floating wrist pins, I can't find a source on if the pistons were cast or forged, but I'd bet forged, since everything else was so heavy duty. 

 

I'm really curious why the Army didn't try and get a little more power out of it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...