Jump to content
Sturgeon's House
LoooSeR

Ukrainian armor - Oplot-M, T-64M Bulat and other.

Recommended Posts

On 9/26/2018 at 11:38 AM, N-L-M said:

In larger 2-strokes, the overpressure problem is solved with a blower of some kind, usually an engine-powered supercharger (turbos don't work at low speed, but external blowing is also possible), which allows the crankcase to not be used for air pumping.

 

The solution used on soviet 5TDF (and probably also 6TD) is especially interesting, because it is a hybrid of turbo and a gear driven centrifugal blower. Primary power source for the blower is of course the gears that connect it to the crankshafts, but at higher engine speeds, the turbine begins to produce more and more power.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, LoooSeR said:

Well, at least those 2 are made in metal and were tested, instead of 3D renders of T-Rex.

But Ukraine has 477 Godlike Objects. And more information with the experience of creating a new generation of tanks

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Karamazov said:

But Ukraine has 477 Godlike Objects. And more information with the experience of creating a new generation of tanks

And? Having several Soviet tanks don't automatically make you capable of designing and producing AFVs. And what "new generation" of tanks Ukraine created?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, LoooSeR said:

And? Having several Soviet tanks don't automatically make you capable of designing and producing AFVs. And what "new generation" of tanks Ukraine created?

Object 477 - its colossal experience for any country and especially for Ukraine. As you can remember, Russia and Ukrain worked on it together. Russia after then created the Object 195 and T-14 after few years. Kharkiv KMDB have everything for the successful creation of a new generation of tanks: "brains", experience, production capacity. Everything except money. Anyway, they will have enough strength for a couple of demonstration tanks. Maybe foreign investors will help. Or the government will find money (hardly)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
36 minutes ago, Karamazov said:

Object 477 - its colossal experience for any country and especially for Ukraine. As you can remember, Russia and Ukrain worked on it together. Russia after then created the Object 195 and T-14 after few years.

/.../

   Majority of work was done on 477 by Soviet Union, not by separated Ukraine and Russia. Experienced is earned by designers and workers, not by country. I doubt that any of those who worked on 477 are still working on anything serious. Also, Object 195 was not a development of 477, while Armata was based on Object 195 and Object 299 ideas.

   

Quote

/.../

Kharkiv KMDB have everything for the successful creation of a new generation of tanks: "brains", experience, production capacity. Everything except money. Anyway, they will have enough strength for a couple of demonstration tanks. Maybe foreign investors will help. Or the government will find money (hardly)

   What? Kharkov barelly managed to poop out last Oplot tank out, they fucked up their work so much that Chinese military industry managed to grab Thai army and sell them their tanks. China signed a contract with Thai army, made and delivered big first batch of VTs in shorter amount of time that it took Kharkov to produce and deliver their yet another batch of 5 Oplots.

   Ukraine in all those years didn't managed to make anything more advanced than "yet another version of T-64" or "yet another version of T-80UD". I doubt that Kharkiv have enough "brains" left, any sort of serious production capability needed to create anything more sophisticated than a re-mix of Soviet-designed parts, and enough money to get out current situation. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 minutes ago, LoooSeR said:

 What? Kharkov barelly managed to poop out last Oplot tank out, they fucked up their work so much that Chinese military industry managed to grab Thai army and sell them their tanks.

Not just the slow manufacture of Oplots. I heard some rumors that there are serious quality problems with them too, and they are very unreliable. Except protection, VT-4 is better in every imaginable way.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, heretic88 said:

Not just the slow manufacture of Oplots. I heard some rumors that there are serious quality problems with them too, and they are very unreliable. Except protection, VT-4 is better in every imaginable way.

   Quality isn't a priority for when you are trying to make PR stunt, which is what Object 477-based/derived tank will be, if Ukrainian official will try to actually make them. Although yes, Dozor-B, BTR-4s, Molot mortars are well known examples of low quality production weapon systems.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, LoooSeR said:

Majority of work was done on 477 by Soviet Union, not by separated Ukraine and Russia. Experienced is earned by designers and workers, not by country. I doubt that any of those who worked on 477 are still working on anything serious. Also, Object 195 was not a development of 477, while Armata was based on Object 195 and Object 299 ideas.

The main work was done by Kharkov KMDB while the USSR was alive. Of course, they didn’t do anything more serious than a "BM Oplot", but that doesn’t cancel their development capabilities. But as I said, they have money difficulties. And this is the most important problem.
 

2 hours ago, LoooSeR said:

What? Kharkov barelly managed to poop out last Oplot tank out

This will not prevent them from making test samples of tanks. But they can only dream of mass production.
 

2 hours ago, LoooSeR said:

Ukraine in all those years didn't managed to make anything more advanced than "yet another version of T-64" or "yet another version of T-80UD". I doubt that Kharkiv have enough "brains" left, any sort of serious production capability needed to create anything more sophisticated than a re-mix of Soviet-designed parts, and enough money to get out current situation. 

As you said, Object 477 is a Soviet mbt. By the same principle, they can use it to "re-mix of Soviet-designed parts", i think.  Of course, if they didn't sold everything to China for example. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Karamazov said:

The main work was done by Kharkov KMDB while the USSR was alive. Of course, they didn’t do anything more serious than a "BM Oplot", but that doesn’t cancel their development capabilities. But as I said, they have money difficulties. And this is the most important problem.

/.../

   Work was done across many participants of Soviet military industrail complex. They can't suddenly now pull those capabilities out of nowhere. Just for example - gun(s), ammunition, armor - were developed outside of Kharkov.

   But not only capabilities - Soviet Union had way more serious military trails/acceptance/development procedures than current Ukraine, which was a reason and a moderator of 1980s MBT projects.

   Having money will not solve this. In fact having money would make it worse, as plenty of projects will be used to steal them instead.

 

1 hour ago, Karamazov said:

/.../

This will not prevent them from making test samples of tanks. But they can only dream of mass production.

/.../

   Azovets 2.0? Assemble a single vehicle from crap and then toss it into a trash bin?

 

1 hour ago, Karamazov said:

/.../

As you said, Object 477 is a Soviet mbt. By the same principle, they can use it to "re-mix of Soviet-designed parts", i think.  Of course, if they didn't sold everything to China for example. 

   USSR didn't finished 477s. It is hard to remix of unfinished and not serially produced systems.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, LoooSeR said:

Just for example - gun(s), ammunition, armor - were developed outside of Kharkov.

I do not condone anyone, but they themselves can make guns and shells. KBA-3 for example, but this is just a modification of 2A46M.

 

3 hours ago, LoooSeR said:

Azovets 2.0? Assemble a single vehicle from crap and then toss it into a trash bin?

Azovets was made by engineers from "Azov" nazi-regiment
 

3 hours ago, LoooSeR said:

 USSR didn't finished 477s. It is hard to remix of unfinished and not serially produced systems.

Yes, all works were transferred to the Russian Federation at the mid 90s. If i remember correct, "Nota" prototype stored in RF. But KMDB have more information about it, for obvious reasons. They can use (will use, if new project will start) this information. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
52 minutes ago, Clan_Ghost_Bear said:

Are those a Ukrainian version of the Assault Breacher in the front row?

They seem to me to just be old T-64A's that have their main guns removed and mine rollers added.  The vehicles on the right side of the image appear to be BREM-1s.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, Karamazov said:

I do not condone anyone, but they themselves can make guns and shells. KBA-3 for example, but this is just a modification of 2A46M.

Exactly. It is just a Soviet-made tank cannon that was re-named.

 

10 hours ago, Karamazov said:

Azovets was made by engineers from "Azov" nazi-regiment

I know that, i was referring to PR noise vs results.

 

10 hours ago, Karamazov said:

Yes, all works were transferred to the Russian Federation at the mid 90s. If i remember correct, "Nota" prototype stored in RF. But KMDB have more information about it, for obvious reasons. They can use (will use, if new project will start) this information. 

It is great that they have piles of documents, problem is that:

1) Tank design was not finished before project died, it needs more R&D

2) Creation of systems that Soviet Union never produced or even had as test/prototype samples

3) Production of test vehicles will be needed, testing in order to make it work, especially brand new autoloader and FCS.

  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Similar Content

    • By LoooSeR
      Hello, my friends and Kharkovites, take a sit and be ready for your brains to start to work - we are going to tell you a terrible secret of how to tell apart Soviet tanks that actually works like GLORIOUS T-80 and The Mighty T-72 from Kharkovites attempt to make a tank - the T-64. Many of capitalists Westerners have hard time understanding what tank is in front of them, even when they know smart words like "Kontakt-5" ERA. Ignoramus westerners!
       
       
         Because you are all were raised in several hundreds years old capitalism system all of you are blind consumer dummies, that need big noisy labels and shiny colorful things to be attached to product X to be sold to your ignorant heads and wallets, thats why we will need to start with basics. BASICS, DA? First - how to identify to which tank "family" particular MBT belongs to - to T-64 tree, or T-72 line, or Superior T-80 development project, vehicles that don't have big APPLE logo on them for you to understand what is in front of you. And how you can do it in your home without access to your local commie tank nerd? 
       
       
         Easy! Use this Putin approved guide "How to tell appart different families of Soviet and Russian tanks from each other using simple and easy to spot external features in 4 steps: a guide for ignorant western journalists and chairborn generals to not suck in their in-depth discussions on the Internet".
       
       
       
      Chapter 1: Where to look, what to see.
       
      T-64 - The Ugly Kharkovite tank that doesn't work 
       
         We will begin with T-64, a Kharkovite attempt to make a tank, which was so successful that Ural started to work on their replacement for T-64 known as T-72. Forget about different models of T-64, let's see what is similar between all of them.
       
       
       

       
       
         
       
       
      T-72 - the Mighty weapon of Workers and Peasants to smash westerners
       
         Unlike tank look-alike, made by Kharkovites mad mans, T-72 is true combat tank to fight with forces of evil like radical moderate barbarians and westerners. Thats why we need to learn how identify it from T-64 and you should remember it's frightening lines!
       

       
       
       
      The GLORIOUS T-80 - a Weapon to Destroy and Conquer bourgeois countries and shatter westerners army
       
         And now we are looking at the Pride of Party and Soviet army, a true tank to spearhead attacks on decadent westerners, a tank that will destroy countries by sucking their military budgets and dispersing their armies in vortex of air, left from high-speed charge by the GLORIOUS T-80!

      The T-80 shooting down jets by hitting them behind the horizont 
          
    • By Walter_Sobchak
      I realized that we don't actually have a thread about the British Chieftain tank.  
       
      I posted a bunch of Chieftain related stuff on my site today for anyone who is interested.  The items include:
       
      Magazine Articles
       
      1970 article from ARMOR
      1970 article from IDR  - Chieftain-Main Battle tank for the 1970s
      1976 article from IDR - The Combat-Improved Chieftain – First Impressions
      1976 article from IDR - Improved Chieftain for Iran
       
      Government reports
       
      WO 194-495 Assessment of Weapon System in Chieftain
      WO 341-108 Automotive Branch Report on Chieftain Modifications
      DEFE 15-1183 – L11 Brochure 
      WO 194-463 – Demonstration of Chieftain Gun 
       
      WO 194-1323 – Feasibility study on Burlington Chieftain
    • By T___A
      This shall be the general thread for all things soviet tanks. I shall start by posting an article I just wrote for my blog. I would recommend Archive Awarness which is an excellent blog about Soviet tanks and their experiences with other nation's tanks.
×