Jump to content
Sturgeon's House
LoooSeR

Ukrainian armor - Oplot-M, T-64M Bulat and other.

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, LoooSeR said:

Ewww, that youtuber. He is not too terrible as some others, but still, pretty lame.

I only posted that for these view bits. He's more of a Wikipedia narrator (literally his only text). 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Stolen from BMPD

4302169_original.jpg

The 34th BM Oplot-T tank, manufactured by Malyshev Plant under the 2011 contract for Thailand. Kharkov, May 25, 2017 (c) Dylan Malyasov

 

Spoiler

4302539_original.jpg

The 32nd BM Oplot-T tank, manufactured by Malyshev Plant under the 2011 contract for Thailand. Kharkov, May 25, 2017 (c) Dylan Malyasov

 

4302841_original.jpg

Presumably, the 35th BM Oplot-T tank, manufactured by Malyshev Plant under the 2011 contract for Thailand. Kharkov, May 25, 2017 (c) Dylan Malyasov

 

4302905_original.jpg

Turret of the 36th Oplot-T, manufactured by Malyshev Plant under the 2011 contract for Thailand. Kharkov, May 25, 2017 (c) Dylan Malyasov


 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

On 5/27/2017 at 5:54 AM, Mighty_Zuk said:

It's true, it can. Don't know since when exactly, but it's visible in test footage, which is plentiful.

e.g at 1:14:

 

 

Interesting.  That definitely does look like an actual neutral steer.

 

On 5/27/2017 at 9:28 AM, Met749 said:

He can(Oplot-M) for new BKP with GOP-900 Hydraulic transmission
http://www.morozov.com.ua/eng/body/gop900.php

 

Do all Oplot-M actually have this transmission?  Per another poster here, the Kharkov design bureau designed several gearboxes that could neutral steer, but never actually mass produced them:

 

On 2/22/2017 at 0:47 AM, Levi said:

GTD-1250 transmission on tanks in Russian inventory is not different from GTD-1000 transmission. At least not fundamentally, probably the ranges are slightly different, I'm not entirely sure about that. Again, I should strees it that transmission with hydrostatic steering was never produced - Russian military was not interested in it, and no foreign customers have been found.

Neutral steer is possible with BKP mechanically wise, but iirc control system does not have this option.

Oplot has pretty much the same transmission setup as T-64, but with external gearset for reverse, so that the vehicle can move backwards on any range.
There is also a bizzare version with hydrostatic steering, that doesn't have any links between BKPs other than engine's crankshaft. It has two IVTs each paralleled to the mechanical part of respective BKP so that reduction can be made continuously without shifting down. But it is forever in development and was never produced. No schematics available.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Comrades posted that on otvaga, so i repost it here.

 

Looks like Oplot use same type of inserts in turret armor as T-80U (plates with cavities filled with something).

XrLZk.png

 

Worst Korean plackard about T-80U

xsssGOnRLn4.jpg

 

Here is a pic of book that says that plates are steel plates with cavities by Met749, Also shows turret frontal armor dimensions.

4nQIl.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, LoooSeR said:

Comrades posted that on otvaga, so i repost it here.

 

Looks like Oplot use same type of inserts in turret armor as T-80U (plates with cavities filled with something).

XrLZk.png

 

Worst Korean plackard about T-80U

xsssGOnRLn4.jpg

 

Here is a pic of book that says that plates are steel plates with cavities by Met749, Also shows turret frontal armor dimensions.

4nQIl.jpg

 

 

Cast cellular filler

early T-80U style -

cell.jpg

and -

cells.jpg

from - http://btvt.info/3attackdefensemobility/armor.htm

 

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

https://andrei-bt.livejournal.com/610848.html post and photos from https://www.facebook.com/DilanST

   Some new AFVs from land of Kharkovites

22047735_1712244272133767_8274443019758827209_o.jpg?oh=a2215c54de586416a525d7b40163e0ee&oe=5A3C9356

Quote

BTR-60 with a make up, hard to recognise

 

22135388_1712244395467088_681848073179077821_o.jpg?oh=15d98474c4d918d0222e1543b17601fb&oe=5A518BD1

Quote

And here is a fashionable upgrade, hull [roof] was raised, and most importantly it have cool headlights.
A tolerable armored personnel carrier.

 

6x6 Otoman with BMP-1 turret glued on top of that mock-up

22051207_1712244268800434_3238126641507127116_o.jpg?oh=12fd43efe7c3ceff642ba184826ee6ae&oe=5A3F1F91

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Similar Content

    • By LoooSeR
      Hello, my friends and Kharkovites, take a sit and be ready for your brains to start to work - we are going to tell you a terrible secret of how to tell apart Soviet tanks that actually works like GLORIOUS T-80 and The Mighty T-72 from Kharkovites attempt to make a tank - the T-64. Many of capitalists Westerners have hard time understanding what tank is in front of them, even when they know smart words like "Kontakt-5" ERA. Ignoramus westerners!
       
       
         Because you are all were raised in several hundreds years old capitalism system all of you are blind consumer dummies, that need big noisy labels and shiny colorful things to be attached to product X to be sold to your ignorant heads and wallets, thats why we will need to start with basics. BASICS, DA? First - how to identify to which tank "family" particular MBT belongs to - to T-64 tree, or T-72 line, or Superior T-80 development project, vehicles that don't have big APPLE logo on them for you to understand what is in front of you. And how you can do it in your home without access to your local commie tank nerd? 
       
       
         Easy! Use this Putin approved guide "How to tell appart different families of Soviet and Russian tanks from each other using simple and easy to spot external features in 4 steps: a guide for ignorant western journalists and chairborn generals to not suck in their in-depth discussions on the Internet".
       
       
       
      Chapter 1: Where to look, what to see.
       
      T-64 - The Ugly Kharkovite tank that doesn't work 
       
         We will begin with T-64, a Kharkovite attempt to make a tank, which was so successful that Ural started to work on their replacement for T-64 known as T-72. Forget about different models of T-64, let's see what is similar between all of them.
       
       
       

       
       
         
       
       
      T-72 - the Mighty weapon of Workers and Peasants to smash westerners
       
         Unlike tank look-alike, made by Kharkovites mad mans, T-72 is true combat tank to fight with forces of evil like radical moderate barbarians and westerners. Thats why we need to learn how identify it from T-64 and you should remember it's frightening lines!
       

       
       
       
      The GLORIOUS T-80 - a Weapon to Destroy and Conquer bourgeois countries and shatter westerners army
       
         And now we are looking at the Pride of Party and Soviet army, a true tank to spearhead attacks on decadent westerners, a tank that will destroy countries by sucking their military budgets and dispersing their armies in vortex of air, left from high-speed charge by the GLORIOUS T-80!

      The T-80 shooting down jets by hitting them behind the horizont 
          
    • By delfosisyu
      Hey guys. This is my first post in this forum.
       
       
       
      I want to find out sources for 2 information.
       
       
       
       
      Firstly, a friend of mine told me about the accuracy of T-80B tested in 1980s.
       
       
       
       
       
      T-80B      1000m   1500m     2000m
                      
                      87%       66%       46%
       
       
       
       
       
      I asked him where he found this data. But he told me he forgot where he did find this since too much time passed from that moment.
       
       
       
       
       
       
      The Second one is about Russian ballistic computer's range-finding rate.
       
       
      One day, one of my friends who speaks russian quite well showed me a product info. of russian(maybe ukrainian) gunner's primary sight.
       
       
      It was written that range-finding rate of the sight after laser fired-off 0.3~3.0 seconds. 
       
       
      I totally forgot the address of that product brochure.
       
       
       
      I'd be very appreciated if you help me finding links of these information.
    • By Walter_Sobchak
      I realized that we don't actually have a thread about the British Chieftain tank.  
       
      I posted a bunch of Chieftain related stuff on my site today for anyone who is interested.  The items include:
       
      Magazine Articles
       
      1970 article from ARMOR
      1970 article from IDR  - Chieftain-Main Battle tank for the 1970s
      1976 article from IDR - The Combat-Improved Chieftain – First Impressions
      1976 article from IDR - Improved Chieftain for Iran
       
      Government reports
       
      WO 194-495 Assessment of Weapon System in Chieftain
      WO 341-108 Automotive Branch Report on Chieftain Modifications
      DEFE 15-1183 – L11 Brochure 
      WO 194-463 – Demonstration of Chieftain Gun 
       
      WO 194-1323 – Feasibility study on Burlington Chieftain
×
×
  • Create New...