Jump to content
Sturgeon's House
LoooSeR

Ukrainian armor - Oplot-M, T-64M Bulat and other.

Recommended Posts

   Kek, one of reasons why Kharkovites can't make their best tanks of the known universe is that it have parts made in Mordor Federation.

Quote

   The state concern "Ukroboronprom" notified the Ministry of Defense of Ukraine about the unwillingness to conclude contracts for the supply of the newest Ukrainian tanks T-84 BM "Oplot" in connection with the ongoing work on import substitution of components that were manufactured in the Russian Federation. This was reported in the department to the request "Radіo Svoboda". The Defense Ministry reported that in 2019 they did not conclude contracts for the manufacture of Oplot tanks with Ukroboronprom.

   Morozov Kharkiv Design Bureau of Mechanical Engineering conducts research work on the replacement of Russian parts, which has not yet been completed. BM "Oplot" was put into service in 2009, but the units of the Armed Forces of Ukraine have not yet been received combat vehicles. In October 2015, the Chief of the Armored Directorate of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, Major General Yuriy Melnik, announced that next year the Ukrainian army would begin to purchase Oplot T-84 tanks.

   In January 2017, the fifth president of Ukraine, Petro Poroshenko, said that one Oplot tank cost as a company of restored T-64 and T-80 tanks, so the first thing to do is to modernize and overhaul existing armored vehicles. In August 2017, the Minister of Defense of Ukraine Stepan Poltorak said that the new Oplot tanks would come into service with the Ukrainian army in the near future.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

    "This is trash" - said representative of the Ministry of Defense about a steel, from which Ukroboronprom decided to produce armored personnel carriers for the Armed Forces of Ukraine. It is about the modern Ukrainian development of the BTR-4, which almost from the first days of the war turned out to be at the forefront of Donbass.

(c) Radio Liberty Ukraine.

   They are using some sort of Finnish steel because of lack of armor-grade steel production in Ukraine.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

   State Enterprise "Kharkov Design Bureau of Mechanical Engineering named after A. Morozov" is forced to transfer almost a thousandth staff of the enterprise to a two-day working week. The reason for this is a series of decisions of the Ministry of Defense of Ukraine, which create the conditions for the destruction of one of the leading defense enterprises of Ukraine.

 

   The Ministry of Defense stopped financing the production of BTR-4 due to the inability of the private company Lozovo Forge-and-Mechanical Plant LLC, which is a monopolist in the manufacture of hulls made of steel grade "71", to produce the required number of cases.

   The 85th military representative department of the Ministry of Defense blocked the ability to produce BTR-4 hulls from the European Union’s armored production capacities at the facilities of the KKBM and other Concern enterprises.
   Thus, all the prerequisites were artificially created to prevent the KGBM from fulfilling the state defense order for the production of the BTR-4 for the Ukrainian army.

At the same time, the Ministry of Defense put forward claims in the KKBM for the payment of penalties in the amount of UAH 82,300,000. for failure to fulfill the order.
Also, the Ministry of Defense, without explanation, stopped funding the development of new types of armored vehicles. In particular, the deep modernization of one of the main tanks of the Ukrainian army, which should radically increase the effectiveness of the combat vehicle."
/.../
   In fact, KhKBM was left without an order for the manufacture of new equipment, without money to develop future AFVs, and under threatened to get a multi-million fine, which will finally block the work of the enterprise.
/.../
   Recall that due to the position of the military representatives on the BTR-4, in April this year, the Zhytomyr Armored Plant SE stopped work on the production of hulls for this vehicle.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

   Ukrainian MoD and companies involved in production of BTR-4s are now full turd throwing competition, on public
"The continuation of the sad show-battle between Ukroboronprom, KhKBM, the Ministry of Defense of Ukraine, LKMZ ... It's sad to watch all this. Agony." Main Kharkovite about that
"The state concern Ukroboronprom declares that Lozovo Forge-and-Mechanical Plant LLC (LKMZ) misleads the society and the Supreme Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces of Ukraine on the quality and cost of Finnish armor for BTR-4, while LKMZ itself is not capable of producing the required number of body armored vehicles.
"The information disseminated by this enterprise that the use of the Finnish armored steel from which NATO armored vehicles are made allegedly leads to an increase in the price of 1 million UAH for one hull does not correspond to reality and is a manifestation of unfair competition," the statement said on the website of Ukroboronprom on Friday."
This is fucking incredible...
   "In fact, the savings on only one building, which is made of Finnish armored steel, amounts to almost 0.4 million UAH. Consequently, the serial production of the BTR-4 speaks of millions of saved budget hryvnias," Ukroboronprom said.
   "At the same time, the state concern notes that due to the position of the 85th military commission of the Ministry of Defense, the use of imported armor is now blocked, and, consequently, the production of BTR-4, because "the real capacities of LKMZ are 1.5 hulls per month."
   According to Ukroboronprom, in the process of ordering and manufacturing the BTR-4, "a military conspiracy plot of No. 85 of the Ministry of Defense and a private producer takes place, where the military department is ready to overpay budget funds to ensure cooperation with a certain private manufacturer."
More..
....
   “We emphasize that only this year LKZM increased prices for the manufacture of the hull by 1.5 times. This significantly increases the cost of one BTR-4 manufactured by the enterprises of the concern for the needs of the Armed Forces,” the State Concern said in a statement.
   Ukroboronprom rejects LKMZ claims that the Finnish MiiluxProtection 500 armor is designed for safes and is not suitable for armored vehicles, as the military departments of 40 countries of the world, including NATO, use armored vehicles with this steel, and the Ministry of Defense of Ukraine is actively using cars " Cossack "and" Warta "made precisely from this armor.
   "A deliberate escalation of negative against steel of the Finnish producer has signs of unfair competition," Ukroboronprom said.
.....
   The management of Lozovsky Forge and Mechanical Plant LLC (LKMZ), which manufactures armored vehicles for armored personnel carriers, transmission components and assemblies, sent an open letter to President Vladimir Zelensky complaining about the actions of Ukroboronprom concern, which lead to financial losses enterprises and reduce the quality of military equipment. A copy of the letter is at the disposal of LB.ua.
   In particular, the appeal states that “Kharkov Design Bureau of Mechanical Engineering named after A. Morozova, "having received at the end of 2016 an order from the Ministry of Defense for the manufacture of 45 BTR-4, in April 2018 ordered LKMZ to manufacture 34 armored corps, but at the end of the year it stopped any payments to the enterprise, including payments made work.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Similar Content

    • By LoooSeR
      Hello, my friends and Kharkovites, take a sit and be ready for your brains to start to work - we are going to tell you a terrible secret of how to tell apart Soviet tanks that actually works like GLORIOUS T-80 and The Mighty T-72 from Kharkovites attempt to make a tank - the T-64. Many of capitalists Westerners have hard time understanding what tank is in front of them, even when they know smart words like "Kontakt-5" ERA. Ignoramus westerners!
       
       
         Because you are all were raised in several hundreds years old capitalism system all of you are blind consumer dummies, that need big noisy labels and shiny colorful things to be attached to product X to be sold to your ignorant heads and wallets, thats why we will need to start with basics. BASICS, DA? First - how to identify to which tank "family" particular MBT belongs to - to T-64 tree, or T-72 line, or Superior T-80 development project, vehicles that don't have big APPLE logo on them for you to understand what is in front of you. And how you can do it in your home without access to your local commie tank nerd? 
       
       
         Easy! Use this Putin approved guide "How to tell appart different families of Soviet and Russian tanks from each other using simple and easy to spot external features in 4 steps: a guide for ignorant western journalists and chairborn generals to not suck in their in-depth discussions on the Internet".
       
       
       
      Chapter 1: Where to look, what to see.
       
      T-64 - The Ugly Kharkovite tank that doesn't work 
       
         We will begin with T-64, a Kharkovite attempt to make a tank, which was so successful that Ural started to work on their replacement for T-64 known as T-72. Forget about different models of T-64, let's see what is similar between all of them.
       
       
       

       
       
         
       
       
      T-72 - the Mighty weapon of Workers and Peasants to smash westerners
       
         Unlike tank look-alike, made by Kharkovites mad mans, T-72 is true combat tank to fight with forces of evil like radical moderate barbarians and westerners. Thats why we need to learn how identify it from T-64 and you should remember it's frightening lines!
       

       
       
       
      The GLORIOUS T-80 - a Weapon to Destroy and Conquer bourgeois countries and shatter westerners army
       
         And now we are looking at the Pride of Party and Soviet army, a true tank to spearhead attacks on decadent westerners, a tank that will destroy countries by sucking their military budgets and dispersing their armies in vortex of air, left from high-speed charge by the GLORIOUS T-80!

      The T-80 shooting down jets by hitting them behind the horizont 
          
    • By delfosisyu
      Hey guys. This is my first post in this forum.
       
       
       
      I want to find out sources for 2 information.
       
       
       
       
      Firstly, a friend of mine told me about the accuracy of T-80B tested in 1980s.
       
       
       
       
       
      T-80B      1000m   1500m     2000m
                      
                      87%       66%       46%
       
       
       
       
       
      I asked him where he found this data. But he told me he forgot where he did find this since too much time passed from that moment.
       
       
       
       
       
       
      The Second one is about Russian ballistic computer's range-finding rate.
       
       
      One day, one of my friends who speaks russian quite well showed me a product info. of russian(maybe ukrainian) gunner's primary sight.
       
       
      It was written that range-finding rate of the sight after laser fired-off 0.3~3.0 seconds. 
       
       
      I totally forgot the address of that product brochure.
       
       
       
      I'd be very appreciated if you help me finding links of these information.
    • By Walter_Sobchak
      I realized that we don't actually have a thread about the British Chieftain tank.  
       
      I posted a bunch of Chieftain related stuff on my site today for anyone who is interested.  The items include:
       
      Magazine Articles
       
      1970 article from ARMOR
      1970 article from IDR  - Chieftain-Main Battle tank for the 1970s
      1976 article from IDR - The Combat-Improved Chieftain – First Impressions
      1976 article from IDR - Improved Chieftain for Iran
       
      Government reports
       
      WO 194-495 Assessment of Weapon System in Chieftain
      WO 341-108 Automotive Branch Report on Chieftain Modifications
      DEFE 15-1183 – L11 Brochure 
      WO 194-463 – Demonstration of Chieftain Gun 
       
      WO 194-1323 – Feasibility study on Burlington Chieftain
×
×
  • Create New...