Jump to content
Sturgeon's House
Sign in to follow this  
T___A

Ukrainian Civil War Thread: All Quiet on the Sturgeon Front

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, Pascal said:

I remember the "THERE'S NO T-90 TANKS" and other stuff.

Until some moment there were no T-90s in Ukraine. And such claims were not supported by evidence until 2017, IIRC when photos surfaced.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 hours ago, LoooSeR said:

Until some moment there were no T-90s in Ukraine. And such claims were not supported by evidence until 2017, IIRC when photos surfaced.

The women tank commander hero of DNR/LNR and top propaganda actor of DNR/LNR will spill the bins to a more concrete situation.It's funnier how everybody jumped on the bandwagon that "Ukraine lied about that", that happened every time, again and again.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Pascal said:

The women tank commander hero of DNR/LNR and top propaganda actor of DNR/LNR will spill the bins to a more concrete situation.It's funnier how everybody jumped on the bandwagon that "Ukraine lied about that", that happened every time, again and again.

 

Because they did lie, A LOT! There were a whole 70 or so *Russians* fighting in DNR and no Armata tanks, unlike the “thousands of elite soldiers, and hundreds of Armatas” the Ukraine government was saying. Like the boy who cried wolf: no one will believe you when you are known as a liar. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, Pascal said:

The women tank commander hero of DNR/LNR and top propaganda actor of DNR/LNR will spill the bins to a more concrete situation.It's funnier how everybody jumped on the bandwagon that "Ukraine lied about that", that happened every time, again and again.

   It is not funny, this is kind of result of their own making - screaming 24\7 about 100 of invasions of Ukraine by Buratian horse troops with no evidence or something like couple of AKs. Russian support in numbers started to appear several months after such claims started to fly around. For me turning point was rebels video with BTR-82 visible on it. Although i still viewed new Ukrainian gov. as piese of shit, so this turning point wasn't in favor of Porosh and co. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Lord_James said:

 

Because they did lie, A LOT! There were a whole 70 or so *Russians* fighting in DNR and no Armata tanks, unlike the “thousands of elite soldiers, and hundreds of Armatas” the Ukraine government was saying. Like the boy who cried wolf: no one will believe you when you are known as a liar. 

Care to show?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, LoooSeR said:

   It is not funny, this is kind of result of their own making - screaming 24\7 about 100 of invasions of Ukraine by Buratian horse troops with no evidence or something like couple of AKs. Russian support in numbers started to appear several months after such claims started to fly around. For me turning point was rebels video with BTR-82 visible on it. Although i still viewed new Ukrainian gov. as pie of shit, so this turning point wasn't in favor of Porosh and co. 

That's interesting.

Why wasn't the turning point when russian soldiers invaded Crimea and parts of Ukraine under the letter that Yanukovych asked Putin to send troops there.Later, no surprise that the letter which was presented at U.N by Churkin was a fake and after that Churkin died and Kremlin now denies they got any kind of letter/statement.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Pascal said:

That's interesting.

Why wasn't the turning point when russian soldiers invaded Crimea and parts of Ukraine 

Because Crimea and E.Ukraine were different situations. In Crimea things were obvious.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, Lord_James said:

 

Care to read this thread from start to finish? 

It's just for confirmation, because somebody above already is a bit wrong because T-90 tanks were already spotted by like august 2016(the date the video was released) and if we believe the people who filmed them, they say it's filmed in 2014.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

   MOSCOW, May 18 - RIA News. The former president of Ukraine, Leonid Kuchma, during a meeting with the Lithuanian delegation, said that the cause of all the country's problems is its history, "written in Moscow." Kuchma's words are quoted by his press secretary, Daria Olifer, on her Facebook.
   "It is important that we know the history of Ukraine better. After all, all the problems are due to the fact that the history of Ukraine was written in Moscow and the characters were drawn in Moscow. And when it comes to (the leader of the UPA * Stepan. - Ed.) Bandera, then I, in general, advocate that historians deal with these issues," the ex-president said, admitting that there may be heroes in different regions of Ukraine.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

   Residents of the self-proclaimed Donetsk and Lugansk People’s Republics (LPR and DPR) began to receive Russian passports at two temporary checkpoints on the border between Russia and Ukraine, RBC reports citing sources close to the Ministry of Internal Affairs.

   According to one of the interlocutors of the agency, applications for issuing passports are currently approved for 1.2 thousand people. A total of 12 thousand documents are under consideration.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Heh, -1 idiot

Quote

   In Kiev, parliament member, legendary Dmitry "There are no casualties" Tymchuk died during oiling his weapon.

   Deputy of the Verkhovna Rada from the faction "Popular Front", coordinator of the "Information Resistance" group Dmitry Tymchuk shot himself while cleaning gifted weapon. This was announced by the deputy Rada Anton Gerashchenko.

   “During the cleaning of the award pistol, the patriot of Ukraine and my friend Dmitry Tymchuk inflicted a mortal wound on himself” wrote Gerashchenko. “An investigative team is working at the scene of the tragedy.”

 

THFfonN.jpg

 

Spoiler

1DDO0te.jpg

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

  • Similar Content

    • By LoooSeR
      BM "Oplot"
       

       

      Ukrainian designers managed to make biggest panoramic sight i ever saw - overall weight of it is reaching 500 kg.
       
       
             Oplot-M, or BM "Oplot" after addoption to service in Ukrainian army, is Ukrainian MBT based on another Ukrainian MBT - T-84 "Oplot", which is Soviet-designed T-80UD with some modifications. BM Oplot was designed by Morozov Kharkiv Machine Building Design Bureau and produced by Malyshev factory. Chief designer of BM Oplot - Mikhail Dem'yanovich Borisuk (he was born in 1934, BTW).
       
       
             It have several features, separating it from T-80UD, T-90A and T-84. Engine is new 6 cylinder 6TD-2E 1200 HP diesel with lowered smokiness and exhaust toxicity (wich is a problem for Kharkov engines) in new engine-transmission compartment (which is 2 part - lower is for engine itself and upper part is for big airfilters, which are needed because of how much air 6TD "eats"), new sort-of automatical transmission. Tank is equipped with new navigation systems, FCS, panoramic sight for commander with day and night (thermal imager) capabilities, new remotely controlled KT-12.7 12.7 mm HMG for commander, new gunner sights, which bring it to modern level of how tank should be equipped. A lot of that equipment is made not in Ukraine.
       
       
      From the side BM Oplot looks different from Soviet T-64-like MBTs.
       
            Main gun is not really different from 2A46 125 mm guns of T-72/ T-80/T-90 series of tanks, 125 mm KBA-3 L48 gun with autoloader for 28 shots (46 in total is carried). Main gun can fire HE, HEAT, APFSDS, GL-ATGMs (Ukrainian "Kombat" missiles). AFAIK part of ammunition is carried outside of the tank, in turret "basket", mounted to the rear part of it. Nothing really fancy here, 5 km range with ATGMs, up to 2.5-2.8 km effective range with APFSDS, which is standart for late Soviet and current Russian MBTs like T-72B3, T-80UE and different models of the T-90. 
       
           Vehicle is also equipped with Ukrainian version/local variant of Shtora system - "Varta", with additional laser-warning sensors on the turret sides. 

       
       
           BM-Oplot use somewhat unusual type of ERA (which is most interesting feature of that tank) - ~layered ERA named "Duplet". It is rumored that it can defeat tandem HEAT warheads like PG-7VR and PG-29V. Vehicle sides are also covered by Duplet ERA. 
       


            Note that the hull UFP is covered by differently shaped blocks of ERA (long and narrow). How much it is effective is unknown, but designers claim that it can defeat tandem HEAT warheads, EFP and APFSDS projectiles.  
       
      Upper frontal hull armor layout:
       
      Side ERA modules:
       
            Overall, BM Oplot is tank with better perfomance than T-80UD thanks to improvements in electronics and FCS, engine, transmission, driver controls, new ERA and better side armor, and in some areas this vehicle can be superioir to T-72B3 (latest Russian serial produced modification of the T-72 MBT, although it wasn't best proposed modification for it).
            But..., there is always "but" -  it is vehicle that Ukraine can not produce in any serious numbers, as their one and only contract with Thai army showed - out of 95 BM Oplot ordered in 2011 only 5-6 were delivered to this day. During trials in Thailand Kombat GL-ATGMs also showed not very good results - AFAIK out of 5 test firings, 2 missiles exploded before reaching targets. Another interesting fact about that tank is that no BM Oplot MBTs are presented on battlefields of Eastern Ukraine - T-64 and T-72s are primary tanks of the VSU. Seems to me Ukraine is either can't service them, or simply can't produce them in a first place.
       
      Oplot-BM on trials in Pakistan. No accurate information on results, rumors say that Chinese VT-4 won that competition.
       
      Oplot-BMs for Thai army on prooving ground.
       

    • By LoooSeR
      From BMPD blog:
       
         Croatian media continue to "untwist" scandal with the repair and purchase of Ukrainian MiG-21bis fighters.
       
         In particular, the newspaper "Jutarnji list" notes that one plane had one wing of Ukrainian origin, another belonged to the MiG-21 from Algeria. Internal fuel tanks were used were made in the USSR, although practically unused, but in the contract they were supposed to be new. Fuselages of five "Ukrainian" MiG-21 actually had Bulgarian origin, despite the fact that they have been written off in Bulgaria itself. On airplanes, there are two fixed plates with serial number - on plane that was transmitted to Croatia had one plate painted over, and the second is attached later.
       

       
         There were also a technical problems. So, on the repaired aircraft "friend or foe" system didn't work well enough, five "Ukrainian" MiG-21 had leaking fuel tanks, navigation system made by CLS production (the Czech company) was not installed in time and worked poorly, radars on all aircraft have technical breakdowns.
         Also, all planes had unsatisfactory condition of hydraulic system, there have been cases when the landing gear could not get out of their niches. Two planes had engine failers in flight, which means that the quality of repair is unsatisfactory or it was not performed at all.
       
       
    • By Collimatrix
      I confess; when EE or Looser or whoever characterized the Ukrainian government's muscle as fascists, I thought this was Russian hyperbole.  I was aware of the presence of far-right elements during the protest period, and had no doubt that there were some neo-nazis in the ranks currently, the characterization seemed exaggerated.  After all, the Soviets had accused NATO of similar things, and surely the Ukrainians wouldn't be so dumb as to openly play into the role of villains in the Russian cultural monomyth of the Great Patriotic War?
       
      I am reconsidering this view.
×
×
  • Create New...