Jump to content
Please support this forum by joining the SH Patreon ×
Sturgeon's House

Syrian conflict.


LoooSeR

Recommended Posts

48 minutes ago, Sgt.Squarehead said:

That will go down well with their southern neighbours.

 

But if the Russians decide to deliver it in person and maybe supply some technical advisers along with the weapons, it will be a whole different ball game.

Doubt it. On one hand, Russia can supply the S-300 in its older variants, and have it destroyed in the next attack as if nothing happened, because that system is very familiar to the west (for example Greece). Russia will be able to say it's just an older variant but it'll have no tactical yield.

Or Russia could supply one of the more modern versions, be completely in the dark as to whether it will work, and definitely suffer on the marketing of it later.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, Sgt.Squarehead said:

Reports of another attack are breaking, this one in Aleppo, targeting Iranian assets.....Apparently the handiwork of Israel:

 

https://www.yahoo.com/news/explosion-heard-government-controlled-area-south-aleppo-monitor-200014979.html

 

https://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-5230445,00.html

 

I didn't saw any confirmation on those strikes so far.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Charly tries to count missiles.

http://charly015.blogspot.ru/2018/04/llego-el-ataque-contra-siria.html

 

76 claimed missiles against "R&D" facility in Damascus. 

siria%2Bataque%2BEEUU%2Bbrit%25C3%25A1nico%2Bfranc%25C3%25A9s%2B2018-4-14%2Bzonas%2Bblancos%2B1b.jpg

lol

 

Claims vs what can be seen on sat photos:

siria%2Bataque%2BEEUU%2Bbrit%25C3%25A1nico%2Bfranc%25C3%25A9s%2B2018-4-14%2Bzonas%2Bblancos%2B2%2Bimpactos.jpg

 

siria%2Bataque%2BEEUU%2Bbrit%25C3%25A1nico%2Bfranc%25C3%25A9s%2B2018-4-14%2Bzonas%2Bblancos%2B2%2Bimpactos%2Bfinal.jpg

 

another target:

siria%2Bataque%2BEEUU%2Bbrit%25C3%25A1nico%2Bfranc%25C3%25A9s%2B2018-4-14%2Bzonas%2Bblancos%2B3%2Bimpactos.jpg

 

siria%2Bataque%2BEEUU%2Bbrit%25C3%25A1nico%2Bfranc%25C3%25A9s%2B2018-4-14%2Bzonas%2Bblancos%2B2%2Bimpactos%2Bfinal%2B2.jpg

 

Quote

Creo que ha quedado demostrado que EEUU ha mentido en dos aspectos fundamentales de este ataque:

1º Que ningún misil fue derribado

2º Que se lanzaron 105 misiles contra 3 instalaciones.

 

"I think it has been shown that the US has lied in two fundamental aspects of this attack:

1º That no missile was shot down

2º That 105 missiles were launched against 3 installations."

 

Additional photos 

Spoiler

d602c08495b21b3dd0b2684614678f7bb8449921030ed9d147ab5d837a498c4e.jpg

 

520b5d48c96999752e7b9bbcd4cc8e174dd223a1aee1b5ce5fa63db9d664bc9e.jpg

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They really didn't like that first building one little bit, did they?  :P

 

It is starting to look like a bit of a nothing-burger attack again though isn't it.....What's the total damage?  If we assume that Assad doesn't actually have a chemical weapons program (keep in mind that history broadly demonstrates that US/UK claims on this subject tend to be fabrications) then I'd say it amounds to a 100+ cruise missile dent in western cash-flow and SFA to Assad.  :rolleyes:

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It appears that this position was AA position, probably no longer used for AA work, but to storage some shit

siria%2Bataque%2BEEUU%2Bbrit%25C3%25A1nico%2Bfranc%25C3%25A9s%2B2018-4-14%2Bzonas%2Bblancos%2B2%2Bimpactos%2Bfinal.jpg

 

http://s5.uploads.ru/D0AT6.png

 

   All targeted buildings were build without any fortification work done, unlike all other parts of this position. Storage area for additional missiles had walls build around it with for protection.  

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some random thoughts on this strike.

 

1. A 70% loss rate for non-stealth munitions is actually low for an attack on contested airspace.  So the Russian MOD numbers for an attack on contested airspace are if anything, low.  I'd personally expect closer to 80-85% losses on non-stealthed munitions, given my understanding of US attack doctrine in contested airspace.  YMMV.

 

2. The sat photos of the targets hit do not indicate damage from 100+ missiles.

 

3. Given that these were supposed to be chemical weapons sites, there is little, if any indication of secondary exposure to nerve agents if you hit an actual chemical weapons site.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Belesarius said:

Some random thoughts on this strike.

 

1. A 70% loss rate for non-stealth munitions is actually low for an attack on contested airspace.  So the Russian MOD numbers for an attack on contested airspace are if anything, low.  I'd personally expect closer to 80-85% losses on non-stealthed munitions, given my understanding of US attack doctrine in contested airspace.  YMMV.

 

2. The sat photos of the targets hit do not indicate damage from 100+ missiles.

 

3. Given that these were supposed to be chemical weapons sites, there is little, if any indication of secondary exposure to nerve agents if you hit an actual chemical weapons site.

 

 

 

1) SAA use old system, i think 70 missiles out of 105 is a lie by MoD, would expect 20-40 intercepted as more realistic number. Only system with high chances of interception of cruise missiles are Buk-M2Es and Pantsirs, probably Pechoras, which Syria have in low numbers

 

2) Photos from those places would help

 

3) They destroyed some shacks, insides of which are very unlikely to contain anything explosive or chemical dangerous and 3 building in the middle of capital with even less chanses to be anything related to storage of CW.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Quote

Nizhniy Novgorod based Arzamas Machinery Plant manufactured BTR80 is equipped with Pelena 6B jammer designed against radio controlled IEDs. 8x8 wheel amphibious armoured personnel carrier was carried above the deck of Russian Navy’s Black Sea Fleet’s LST Orsk en route to #Tartus

Da1gJQUUwAAKbL2.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

https://www.spb.kp.ru/daily/26819.5/3856087/

Video:

https://kp-platform.cdnvideo.ru/kp/mp4/54/647378_1523834204.mp4

Quote

Military Correspondent of the "KP" Alexander Kots on the ruins of the Research Institute for the Development of the Pharmaceutical and Chemical Industry Barze in Damascus met with staff

wx1080.jpg

 

Quote

"The theory was taught here," Jarub Haddur shows in a remotely reminiscent cabinet of concrete trash with a collapsed staircase. "- Here were taught natural sciences. Nearby - the laboratory for scientific experiments. Here was the training equipment. No poisonous substances were developed here, simply there was no necessary equipment for this."

 

Quote

- What did you teach?

- Information technology. Everything that is connected with computers, hardware, software, basic network technologies, advanced. Courses on working with operating systems ... That's exactly where our audiences were ... - the teacher thinks a little. "But we will rebuild everything anew, every brick destroyed by the Americans, we will restore."

   Logic attacks on this object is difficult to understand. The Institute is located in a dense urban area. And if some poisonous substances were actually produced in this scientific research institute, the Americans were very much in danger of organizing a local chemical catastrophe in one of the districts of the Syrian capital. And, perhaps, they must be very confident that there are no weapons of mass destruction in this scientific research institute, so that without the slightest fear they leveled it to the ground.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...