Jump to content
Sturgeon's House
LoooSeR

Syrian conflict.

Recommended Posts

   SAA took over few villages in Idlibostan

Q6WGqPZ.jpg

 

   Also

Quote

   The Syrian Arab News Agency (SANA) reported on the evening of November 25 that "unidentified aircrafts" were attacking military installations northeast of Aleppo.
According to this source, strikes are carried out along the perimeter of the cities of Al-Bab and Al-Rai. No dead or wounded were reported.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

   MOSCOW, December 2. / TASS /. Three Russian military policemen sustained minor injuries as a result of the detonation of an IED near an armored car in northeastern Syria. This was reported on Monday in the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation.
   According to the agency, on December 2, during the reconnaissance of the route for a joint Russian-Turkish patrol, 1.5 km west of the village of Koran (Kobani district of Aleppo province), an improvised explosive device went off on the way of an armored car of the Russian military police.

   This isn't surprising at all. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Panthera lost by the Islamists yesterday in the failed offensive (the frontline is back today). 

And a very big boom in Idlibostan. Not sure if ODAB though, could it be just a shockwave in a humid air? 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Certain HTS leader was killed today by US drone strike near Turkish borders. It looks like the strike was done with non-explosive blade warhead.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Beer said:

Certain HTS leader was killed today by US drone strike near Turkish borders. It looks like the strike was done with non-explosive blade warhead.

 

 

   From previous page - US UAVs (MQ-9 Reaper in this case) were spotted flying over Idlibostan very recently, i expected something like that, and it would be not the first time.

EKDwT4yWwAEdKIQ.jpg

 

Spoiler

EKDwTYlWsAEnSY0.jpg

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There are more and more rumors about Turkey handed over some Leopard-2s to jihadists.

SAA and Kurdish tankists will be in a big trouble if they want to face these tanks with T-55/62/72, their only chance is a surprise flank attack. But hopefully the Leopards will be taken out by ATGM teams soon.

 

http://gurkhan.blogspot.com/2019/12/blog-post_4.html

 

IMG_20191203_191743.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, heretic88 said:

There are more and more rumors about Turkey handed over some Leopard-2s to jihadists.

SAA and Kurdish tankists will be in a big trouble if they want to face these tanks with T-55/62/72, their only chance is a surprise flank attack. But hopefully the Leopards will be taken out by ATGM teams soon.

 

http://gurkhan.blogspot.com/2019/12/blog-post_4.html

 

IMG_20191203_191743.jpg

 

   Those are Turkish tanks supporting Turkish proxies there. IDK what Gurkhan is talking about.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

   A large convoy of the Russian Armed Forces consisting of: Iveco LMV "Lynx", SBM "Tiger-M", BTR-82A, cargo KAMAZ, Ural-4320, Typhoon-K as well as the BAZ-6909, and the tankers are moving towards the airfield in Al-Qamishly in the province of Khasaka.

   Apparently, the delivery of equipment and materials for the arrangement of the base continues.

 

sYkiiqz.jpg

 

Spoiler

RCFOddt.jpg

 

7V8UZ9L.jpg

 

2aXNEW7.jpg

 

DZvDsDH.jpg

 

OFPi2qQ.jpg

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
22 hours ago, LoooSeR said:

IDK what Gurkhan is talking about.

Well, not just him. Not long ago such rumors also appeared in german media. Knowing how crazy Sultan Erdogan is, these rumors might be true actually.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, heretic88 said:

Well, not just him. Not long ago such rumors also appeared in german media. Knowing how crazy Sultan Erdogan is, these rumors might be true actually.

  Well, Jihadists received some MRAPS months ago, Turkish troops are moving SNA shitbags using Turkish army IFVs (there are videos with them), but i doubt that Turkish troops trained any of those akbars to utilize Leo2s in that short amount of time. MRAP that were given to akbars are almost civilian-grade vehicles from driving/servicing POV.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Beer said:

Not only MRAPs. ACV-15 IFVs have been pretty widespread among the jihadists for years already. 

IIRC they had Turkish Army crews, with exception of very few vehicles.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 hours ago, LoooSeR said:

IIRC they had Turkish Army crews, with exception of very few vehicles.

 

No, they were commonly used with jihadi crews and they were also quite often destroyed in the fighting. The available footage shows stuff like single ACV-15 charge on SDF positions etc. That's a level of incompetence which definitely can't be attributed to the Turkish army. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Beer said:

 

No, they were commonly used with jihadi crews and they were also quite often destroyed in the fighting. The available footage shows stuff like single ACV-15 charge on SDF positions etc. That's a level of incompetence which definitely can't be attributed to the Turkish army. 

   Again, amount of ACVs given to jihadist was very low compared to other armored vehicles those guys used like BMPs and T-55/72s. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

   Specialists of the SSO of the Ministry of Defense of Russia, ensuring the security of the commander of the United Group of Forces in Syria, Lieutenant General Chaiko during a meeting with the Turkish side in the area of granaries at Ain Issa.

   Raqqa Province, Syria.

fWrE4PU.jpg

 

Spoiler

MbGCrm6.jpg

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Similar Content

    • By LoooSeR
      Hello, my friends and Kharkovites, take a sit and be ready for your brains to start to work - we are going to tell you a terrible secret of how to tell apart Soviet tanks that actually works like GLORIOUS T-80 and The Mighty T-72 from Kharkovites attempt to make a tank - the T-64. Many of capitalists Westerners have hard time understanding what tank is in front of them, even when they know smart words like "Kontakt-5" ERA. Ignoramus westerners!
       
       
         Because you are all were raised in several hundreds years old capitalism system all of you are blind consumer dummies, that need big noisy labels and shiny colorful things to be attached to product X to be sold to your ignorant heads and wallets, thats why we will need to start with basics. BASICS, DA? First - how to identify to which tank "family" particular MBT belongs to - to T-64 tree, or T-72 line, or Superior T-80 development project, vehicles that don't have big APPLE logo on them for you to understand what is in front of you. And how you can do it in your home without access to your local commie tank nerd? 
       
       
         Easy! Use this Putin approved guide "How to tell appart different families of Soviet and Russian tanks from each other using simple and easy to spot external features in 4 steps: a guide for ignorant western journalists and chairborn generals to not suck in their in-depth discussions on the Internet".
       
       
       
      Chapter 1: Where to look, what to see.
       
      T-64 - The Ugly Kharkovite tank that doesn't work 
       
         We will begin with T-64, a Kharkovite attempt to make a tank, which was so successful that Ural started to work on their replacement for T-64 known as T-72. Forget about different models of T-64, let's see what is similar between all of them.
       
       
       

       
       
         
       
       
      T-72 - the Mighty weapon of Workers and Peasants to smash westerners
       
         Unlike tank look-alike, made by Kharkovites mad mans, T-72 is true combat tank to fight with forces of evil like radical moderate barbarians and westerners. Thats why we need to learn how identify it from T-64 and you should remember it's frightening lines!
       

       
       
       
      The GLORIOUS T-80 - a Weapon to Destroy and Conquer bourgeois countries and shatter westerners army
       
         And now we are looking at the Pride of Party and Soviet army, a true tank to spearhead attacks on decadent westerners, a tank that will destroy countries by sucking their military budgets and dispersing their armies in vortex of air, left from high-speed charge by the GLORIOUS T-80!

      The T-80 shooting down jets by hitting them behind the horizont 
          
    • By LoooSeR
      T-14 ARMATA 
      (edited)
              This thread is about glorious russian MBT T-14, known as "Armada", "T-95", "black eagle", "T-99" and other stupid Western names given to Object 148 (T-14 in some recent documents). Here is number of images connected to that vehicle.
       

      Official model of unknown "artillery vehicle". Yeah, Putin, we know that this is T-14. Note Gatling gun on turret right side.
       
      Artist impression of T-14 based on known model, by Fyodor Podporin. 
       

      T-14 will use Relikt ERA, which is considerable improvement over Kontakt-5 in resisting to tandem HEAT warheads and EFPs.

       
      Side skirts would be thicker on a real vehicle, i think. Relikt have AFAIK bigger size than Kontakt-5 ERA build-in blocks.

       
       
       
       
       
      Whole album with renders: 
      http://imgur.com/a/8Tn9b
       
      Video of same render from same artist:

       
       
            People expect that tank would have turret weapon system like what you see on the BMP-3 "Bakhcha-U" turret - a lot of weapons in one turret for one gunner to work with. T-14 is rumored to be equipped with 30 (or even 57) mm autocannon, 4-6 barrel gatling type MG/HMG, new 125 (2A82) or even 152 mm (2A83) smoothbore cannons. Turret is unmanned, crew of 3 would be located in frontal part of hull, behind very serious frontal armor inside of compartment, well protected from all directions. Cannon would be loaded by new autoloading device. I hope that Burevestnik is working on them, those guys managed to make 100 mm Naval gun with RoF of 300 shots per minute.
       
            I really like how turret looks, but i don't understand why there is such a big turret "busket" for unmanned turret with all ammo placed inside of hull in special armored housing. Also, i don't see gunner sight and proposed FSC radar on 3D model (i assume that panoramic sight is for commander). Laser sensors on 3D model are from T-90A variant of "Shtora".
       
            Some officials mentioned works on new active protection system, that consist of powerfull radar station, that can work on "long ranges" and engage incoming projectiles (missiles) with that gatling MG. Will this system survive development stage and be presented on serial tanks is unknown. Although turret for T-15 Armata-based IFV already was shown with new APS "Afganit".
       
            If you pay attention you may see that artist used T-80 rollers for Armata chassis, and this is not a mistake - according to some sources Armata heavy chassis will use T-80 or T-80-like rollers to save weight. And looking at rear part of that tank you may notice a engine deck from gas-turbine equipped version of the T-80, which can be mistake becuase MoD want Armata with new ~1500 HP diesel engine. 
    • By Darjeeling
      Greetings, I have been studying in the battle of Afrin since it started. Yet I still lack some information that can clearly analyse the opposite plan, war progress and order of battle of both side (Turkey army clear but YPG isn’t).
       
      I am spectacular interested in the process of the battle as it revealed the true strength of the 2nd largest NATO army. Also, the performance of YPG/YPJ militant against the regular modern army is meaningful to modern warfare study too.
       
      Hence, any kind man can help me on this field or even just give out a reading list?
×
×
  • Create New...