Jump to content
Sturgeon's House
Vasily Krysov

T-80 Megathread: Astronomical speed and price!

Recommended Posts

39 minutes ago, Collimatrix said:

Does the turbine really smoke that much, or are those perchance filthy Kharkovite T-80UDs?

They're T-80Us.  You can tell because the post the MG is mounted on is present on them.  T-80UDs have the MGs mounted on the cupola.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 7/16/2018 at 10:06 PM, Jim Warford said:

soviet%2Bmilitary%2Bopower%2Bt-80.jpg

Not true...that drawing was published in the 1981 edition of the Pentagon's annual journal, "Soviet Military Power." That journal was primarily a propaganda tool used by the US DOD and it included many hypothetical drawings over the years to include this infamous "T-80." While it's true that there was some confusion around identifying the T-80 exactly (which was finally corrected for the public in that unclassified journal in the 1986 edition), classified reporting regarding the T-80 had already been in use for many years before the published photo in 1986. A CIA report published in Oct 1979 (2 years before the release of the hypothetical drawing above), for example, confirms the first sighting of the actual T-80 with a photo. 

 

Here are the pics related to the Oct 1979 intel report on the T-80. The pic was actually taken "prior to 1976." The higher quality version didn't become available until much later... 

T-80%20Tank%20Prototype_CIA-FOIA_Oct1979

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 hours ago, Jim Warford said:

Here are the pics related to the Oct 1979 intel report on the T-80. The pic was actually taken "prior to 1976." The higher quality version didn't become available until much later... 

/.../

So why then painting that thing if they had some sort of photo of actual vehicle?

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, LoooSeR said:

So why then painting that thing if they had some sort of photo of actual vehicle?

 

An explanation can be the following : sometimes intelligence services don’t want to make it clear to the enemy what they know about him. 

Maskirovka.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Serge said:

An explanation can be the following : sometimes intelligence services don’t want to make it clear to the enemy what they know about him. 

Maskirovka.

We should start to put people into gulags for using this word everywhere.

 

I don't see any hard from making accurate T-80 drawings. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, Serge said:

You, you don’t see. But other people, by the 70’d, saw. 

Maskirovka.

   Taking into account that news about Murican's getting some info on new Soviet MBTs (Boxer/Molot) sparked a lot of redesigns, extra cost and longer development time there is a good reason to release such info.

 

   And that is not a maskirovka.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In 1976, when I was child, I was not in charge of maskirovka for the French Army. So, ask to people concerned by this period. I just give an explanation I was given a little after this period. When we were preparing war. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The Soviet Military Power annuals were intended for multiple audiences...in my opinion, those audiences were both foreign and domestic. Again, in my opinion, folks and organizations in the US would be energized to see images of Soviet tanks with slab-sided turrets that imply advanced western-style armor of some kind. It's clear that some people not in the know, believed that drawing of the "T-80" to be accurate. Also, showing the world that the US had a good photo of the T-80 in 1976/1979 would have confirmed where and when we were looking, and more importantly, (potentially)...how the US got the photo. Those are the most important secrets of all...

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Lostarmor article on T-80BV in Yemen war.

 

Quote

/.../

   As it was said, before the war in Yemen, the T-80BV was used only during the fighting in the Chechen Republic in 94-96, where a number of tanks of this type were lost (exact figures are unknown, but there were 65 tanks of all types in total during 1994-1996). Perhaps, it will be possible to get closer to truthful figures if the LostArmour administration opens an appropriate section - on the Internet, it was easy to find photos of a dozen lost T-80BV.

/.../

 

%D0%BF%D0%BE%D1%82%D0%B5%D1%80%D1%8F21.jpg

 

Spoiler

%D0%BF%D0%BE%D1%82%D0%B5%D1%80%D1%8F11.jpg

 

%D0%BF%D0%BE%D1%82%D0%B5%D1%80%D1%8F6.jpg

 

Quote

   In Yemen, the T-80BV got rather late - in 2011-2012 from Belarus, 66 (according to other data 92) modernized tanks were obtained, which went to the elite 3rd armored brigade of the Republican Guard. At that time, the Republican Guard was the basis of Ali Abdullah Saleh Affah's regime. The commander of the brigade was the president's nephew, Brig. Gen. Tariq Affash. However, in the same 2012, after the overthrow of Saleh and subsequent conflicts with representatives of the old authorities, the new president Hadi dissolved the Republican Guard and created Strategic Reserve Forces on its base. The whole fleet of T-80 tanks was transferred to the Presidential Guard, consisting of several brigades, isolated from the Yemeni Armed Forces. The Guard was created to protect the president and was under his personal control. Most likely, the T-80s were transferred to the 1st brigade, based at the Al-Nukhaddin camp, not far from the capital.

 

%D1%82%D0%B0%D1%80%D0%B8%D0%BA.jpg

 

Quote

   With the beginning of the uprising against the Hadi regime in 2014, the Houthis and their allies quickly took over the greater part of the capital and on September 21 announced the expulsion of the Saudi puppet, but they could not completely take the province until the beginning of February 2015. After that the Houthis began active assault in the direction of the largest cities of Yemen after Sana'a - Aden, Taiz and Marib.

 

%D1%81%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B01.jpg

 

Quote

Even during the fighting for Sana, Houthis captured a large number of armored vehicles, among them were several T-80BVs, another was destroyed during the battle for the Presidential Palace on January 19, 2015.

 

%D1%81%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B02.jpg

 

Spoiler

%D1%81%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B03.jpg

 

%D1%81%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B04.jpg

 

Quote

   However, they caught the largest catch during the capture of that same Al Nukhaddin camp, not far from Sanaa - that was where the lion's share of the Presidential Guards armored vehicles lay. Hadi's guards retreated so quickly under the Houthis pressure that they could not evacuate any armored vehicles.

 

80-%D0%B1%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B011.jpg

 

Spoiler

80-%D0%B1%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B0.jpg

 

Quote

   It should be noted that the fate of most of the tanks is unknown - with the beginning of the intervention, all military bases under the control of the Houthis were under the massive bombing of the Saudi Air Force's air force, including the first brigade camp, but no photos were found from there. With a high degree of probability, the Houthis still managed to evacuate the equipment to a safe place, and it was not destroyed.

   Also, a small number of T-80BV tanks were sent to the front in the province of Marib, where the Houthis suffered significant losses of equipment under the air strikes of the coalition. At the moment, we know of the loss of at least 4 T-80BV tanks, in addition to the tank destroyed in the Presidential Palace area.

id8018-04.jpg

 

Spoiler

id9655-01.jpg

 

id16911-01.jpg

 

Quote

   Another T-80BV tank was captured by the Hadists at the end of September 2015 during the infamous offensive on the Mariba Dam, where the allies of the coalition lost a huge amount of Oshkosh M-ATV MRAPs.

 

80-6.jpg

 

Spoiler

80-4.jpg

 

Quote

   However, in the army of Hadi, this tank served very briefly and already in October received damage, most likely from fire ATGM, while ERA worked in the normal mode. Since then, the tank no longer appeared in the Arab media reports.

 

80-5.jpg

 

Quote

   The fate of the remaining Hothis armored vehicles is unknown, and they preferred other types of tanks, mostly more customary for Yemen T-55/62 and their modifications.

   Noteworthy is the fact that one of the last spotted tank on the territory/in use by the Hothis was T-72S, which they rolled out in Sana for battles with supporters of Saleh, who did jump to the side of the coalition in a wrong time.

 

Spoiler

72-1.jpg

 

72-2.jpg

 

Quote

   Most likely, the unpopularity of T-80 tanks among Yemenis is caused by the difficulty in servicing, as well as the peculiarities of the gas turbine engine. The fuel shortage that began with the beginning of the blockade of Yemen by the coalition countries also significantly complicated the possibility of its use in combat. In any case, we can state the fact that, despite all its merits, the T-80 tank, which was created as a breakthrough weapon, is not suitable for the war in Yemen.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Similar Content

    • By LoooSeR
      Hello, my friends and Kharkovites, take a sit and be ready for your brains to start to work - we are going to tell you a terrible secret of how to tell apart Soviet tanks that actually works like GLORIOUS T-80 and The Mighty T-72 from Kharkovites attempt to make a tank - the T-64. Many of capitalists Westerners have hard time understanding what tank is in front of them, even when they know smart words like "Kontakt-5" ERA. Ignoramus westerners!
       
       
         Because you are all were raised in several hundreds years old capitalism system all of you are blind consumer dummies, that need big noisy labels and shiny colorful things to be attached to product X to be sold to your ignorant heads and wallets, thats why we will need to start with basics. BASICS, DA? First - how to identify to which tank "family" particular MBT belongs to - to T-64 tree, or T-72 line, or Superior T-80 development project, vehicles that don't have big APPLE logo on them for you to understand what is in front of you. And how you can do it in your home without access to your local commie tank nerd? 
       
       
         Easy! Use this Putin approved guide "How to tell appart different families of Soviet and Russian tanks from each other using simple and easy to spot external features in 4 steps: a guide for ignorant western journalists and chairborn generals to not suck in their in-depth discussions on the Internet".
       
       
       
      Chapter 1: Where to look, what to see.
       
      T-64 - The Ugly Kharkovite tank that doesn't work 
       
         We will begin with T-64, a Kharkovite attempt to make a tank, which was so successful that Ural started to work on their replacement for T-64 known as T-72. Forget about different models of T-64, let's see what is similar between all of them.
       
       
       

       
       
         
       
       
      T-72 - the Mighty weapon of Workers and Peasants to smash westerners
       
         Unlike tank look-alike, made by Kharkovites mad mans, T-72 is true combat tank to fight with forces of evil like radical moderate barbarians and westerners. Thats why we need to learn how identify it from T-64 and you should remember it's frightening lines!
       

       
       
       
      The GLORIOUS T-80 - a Weapon to Destroy and Conquer bourgeois countries and shatter westerners army
       
         And now we are looking at the Pride of Party and Soviet army, a true tank to spearhead attacks on decadent westerners, a tank that will destroy countries by sucking their military budgets and dispersing their armies in vortex of air, left from high-speed charge by the GLORIOUS T-80!

      The T-80 shooting down jets by hitting them behind the horizont 
          
    • By Sturgeon
      I'll start off with a couple Pathe videos:


       

       

       

    • By LoooSeR
      BM "Oplot"
       

       

      Ukrainian designers managed to make biggest panoramic sight i ever saw - overall weight of it is reaching 500 kg.
       
       
             Oplot-M, or BM "Oplot" after addoption to service in Ukrainian army, is Ukrainian MBT based on another Ukrainian MBT - T-84 "Oplot", which is Soviet-designed T-80UD with some modifications. BM Oplot was designed by Morozov Kharkiv Machine Building Design Bureau and produced by Malyshev factory. Chief designer of BM Oplot - Mikhail Dem'yanovich Borisuk (he was born in 1934, BTW).
       
       
             It have several features, separating it from T-80UD, T-90A and T-84. Engine is new 6 cylinder 6TD-2E 1200 HP diesel with lowered smokiness and exhaust toxicity (wich is a problem for Kharkov engines) in new engine-transmission compartment (which is 2 part - lower is for engine itself and upper part is for big airfilters, which are needed because of how much air 6TD "eats"), new sort-of automatical transmission. Tank is equipped with new navigation systems, FCS, panoramic sight for commander with day and night (thermal imager) capabilities, new remotely controlled KT-12.7 12.7 mm HMG for commander, new gunner sights, which bring it to modern level of how tank should be equipped. A lot of that equipment is made not in Ukraine.
       
       
      From the side BM Oplot looks different from Soviet T-64-like MBTs.
       
            Main gun is not really different from 2A46 125 mm guns of T-72/ T-80/T-90 series of tanks, 125 mm KBA-3 L48 gun with autoloader for 28 shots (46 in total is carried). Main gun can fire HE, HEAT, APFSDS, GL-ATGMs (Ukrainian "Kombat" missiles). AFAIK part of ammunition is carried outside of the tank, in turret "basket", mounted to the rear part of it. Nothing really fancy here, 5 km range with ATGMs, up to 2.5-2.8 km effective range with APFSDS, which is standart for late Soviet and current Russian MBTs like T-72B3, T-80UE and different models of the T-90. 
       
           Vehicle is also equipped with Ukrainian version/local variant of Shtora system - "Varta", with additional laser-warning sensors on the turret sides. 

       
       
           BM-Oplot use somewhat unusual type of ERA (which is most interesting feature of that tank) - ~layered ERA named "Duplet". It is rumored that it can defeat tandem HEAT warheads like PG-7VR and PG-29V. Vehicle sides are also covered by Duplet ERA. 
       


            Note that the hull UFP is covered by differently shaped blocks of ERA (long and narrow). How much it is effective is unknown, but designers claim that it can defeat tandem HEAT warheads, EFP and APFSDS projectiles.  
       
      Upper frontal hull armor layout:
       
      Side ERA modules:
       
            Overall, BM Oplot is tank with better perfomance than T-80UD thanks to improvements in electronics and FCS, engine, transmission, driver controls, new ERA and better side armor, and in some areas this vehicle can be superioir to T-72B3 (latest Russian serial produced modification of the T-72 MBT, although it wasn't best proposed modification for it).
            But..., there is always "but" -  it is vehicle that Ukraine can not produce in any serious numbers, as their one and only contract with Thai army showed - out of 95 BM Oplot ordered in 2011 only 5-6 were delivered to this day. During trials in Thailand Kombat GL-ATGMs also showed not very good results - AFAIK out of 5 test firings, 2 missiles exploded before reaching targets. Another interesting fact about that tank is that no BM Oplot MBTs are presented on battlefields of Eastern Ukraine - T-64 and T-72s are primary tanks of the VSU. Seems to me Ukraine is either can't service them, or simply can't produce them in a first place.
       
      Oplot-BM on trials in Pakistan. No accurate information on results, rumors say that Chinese VT-4 won that competition.
       
      Oplot-BMs for Thai army on prooving ground.
       

    • By Walter_Sobchak
      This thread is where to post all the stupid and annoying tank myths that fail to go away.  We shall start with two pointed out by Marsh over in the Swedish tank thread.
       
       
      1. The S-Tank was designed as a tank destroyer or as a tank only fit for just defensive missions.   2. The Merkava was designed for asymmetric combat in an urban environment, rather than full scale armour versus armour battle.     I will add a few:   Any tank suspension without return rollers is a "Christie" suspension.  In particular, T-55 and T-62,   HEAT munitions create a molten jet that "burns" its way through armor.    The French 75mm gun on the AMX 13 is a copy of the German KwK 42        
×