Jump to content
Please support this forum by joining the SH Patreon ×
Sturgeon's House

ZloyKrolik

Contributing Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    180

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

 Content Type 

Everything posted by ZloyKrolik

  1. ZloyKrolik
    From Tank & AFV News I think the marijauna legalization is going a bit too far.
  2. ZloyKrolik
    Its weird to see an Abrams with an infantry bumper number. 1-8 IN in that video.
  3. ZloyKrolik
    From the Sherman thread: >Indirect Fire Control Gear You would think that would be it for fire control equipment, but it’s not, because all Shermans came equipped with the equipment for their tanks to work as impromptu artillery batteries all Sherman based TDs had this gear as well. The US Army had this extra gear installed all the way up to the M60 tanks. During the war, some tank and TD battalions were very good at being artillery; other units didn’t train for it, and were not good. This was a good way of keeping tanks useful in Italy, and they filled this role a lot there. I do not think this was something many other nations did with their tanks. I remember setting up range cards for night firing on M60A1s using this gear. Pretty much the same equipment.
  4. ZloyKrolik
    If your blowout panels go, what happens to the RCWS is probably the least of your worries.
  5. ZloyKrolik
    With everybody and their brother producing new IFV, vehicle ID is getting harder and harder.
  6. ZloyKrolik
    Left over M60A2 turrets (ALVB conversions) were put on M48 hulls for hard targets. At least one was used as a static display.
  7. ZloyKrolik
    Or that is one short dude.
  8. ZloyKrolik
    Any idea what this is? Found it here:https://www.reddit.com/r/tanks/comments/4z9ebv/what_variant_sherman_is_this_it_seems_to_have_an/
  9. ZloyKrolik
    Was the Tiger really that bad at what it was designed to do as a breakthrough tank? By the time it was fielded, it's role wasn't needed that much.
  10. ZloyKrolik
    Apricots are bad luck on US tanks.
  11. ZloyKrolik
    Aww, what happened to part 1?
  12. ZloyKrolik
    Like a scene out of Patton.
  13. ZloyKrolik
  14. ZloyKrolik
    T-34-85/76?
  15. ZloyKrolik
    Interesting, but not Armored Fighting Vehicles.
  16. ZloyKrolik
    Yep, that looks like the same style/font on signs still in use today.
  17. ZloyKrolik
    I remember from my time on tanks (M60A1/A3 & M1A1) that there were decals for all sorts of stowage and stuff along with warnings. Would the Sherman have the same signage?
  18. ZloyKrolik
    The tanker bar hasn't changed over time as well. Hey Jeeps, what about the internal signage? I don't think the decals and sign for stowage have changed either.
  19. ZloyKrolik
    Damn new physics.
  20. ZloyKrolik
    Does anyone have a link to an article about the American Military Liaison Mission that first took pictures of the T-72. Wasn't the officer later wounded or killed?
  21. ZloyKrolik
    The video of the Italians showed a lot of short rounds fired. Must have been from the first day.
  22. ZloyKrolik
    Probably because of something like this:
  23. ZloyKrolik
    Some did. I believe that the Chieftain commented about it in the video. 7:20
  24. ZloyKrolik
    Wehraboo in a Chieftain's Hatch: http://forum.worldoftanks.com/index.php?/topic/492089-the-chieftains-hatch-german-tactics-as-told-by-the-ussr/
  25. ZloyKrolik
    T-34-85
×
×
  • Create New...