Jump to content
Please support this forum by joining the SH Patreon ×
Sturgeon's House

Vollketten

Contributing Members
  • Posts

    4
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Recent Profile Visitors

374 profile views

Vollketten's Achievements

Newbie

Newbie (1/3)

3

Reputation

  1. Then for what it's worth I apologise.
  2. I don't usually reply or post here but your ridiculous reply requires at least a short comment. I'm not going to get drawn into a squabble with you as I only come to SH mainly to keep up with Collimatrix's transmission or the M4 stuff. You use "" as if finding something was minor, it isn't and it wasn't and if it was so easy to find or out there then everyone would already have had it and not just repasted the cropped screenshots I'd taken. There was no point in adding tags as the info was easy enough to find but the purpose IS NOT to claim ownership but simply to ensure credit. It wasn't given as it was due which was the cause of my little irritation. It's redundant now anyway as I posted the source and enough people have now also gone to the CIA declassified docs to find it and other wonderful silliness like Tigers in Syria. It is common practice to add a tag to an image and that is not the same as adding a 'copyright' etc. which is a claim of ownership. I'm sorry you don't get that and felt the need to be so silly. That's it from me on the subject though I'm sure I can expect another tirade of abuse but I'd point out that as 'forum nobility' you may be seen as holding a position of power or reputation on this forum and thereby reflecting some of the values and openness of this place. As such a reply like your other one will do nothing to dispel the view of some of SH as being a hugbox or being of approachable. If you want people to bring information here you should moderate your attitude or just continue to act as a bully in a position of repute and be seen for what you are. Anyway, I'm glad those were of interest to people although frankly I'm a little surprised they were declassified. Its not that the rough concept had not already been well considered or that enough photos of Abrams from Iraq with damage had not yielded information but there's a difference between an official document details a rough layout (albeit not composition) and information gleamed from photos here and there. I'll continue to follow SH but I will go back to being a passive viewer of content and not an active poster thank you.
  3. This was the source Had they bothered to ask I'd have given it to them
  4. post #1 here Good to see my find is doing the rounds already. I knew I should have added tags to those. They could at least have read the tank net post for the source
×
×
  • Create New...