Jump to content
Please support this forum by joining the SH Patreon ×
Sturgeon's House

Akula_941

Forum Nobility
  • Posts

    100
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3

Akula_941 last won the day on November 11 2018

Akula_941 had the most liked content!

Recent Profile Visitors

1,752 profile views

Akula_941's Achievements

Newbie

Newbie (1/3)

114

Reputation

  1. @Flametzmost of the information, history and data of J-12 comes from the chief designer Lu Xiao Peng(陆孝彭)'s Memoirs. You don't get documents,or any accurate source. The original report and stuff are no doubt still classified, that's how thing works here
  2. Akula_941

    UAV thread

    droping 82mm small death avocado
  3. just an improved protection Type-59-1 prototype, nothing too fancy,what they are researching are likely used on Type-69-2A
  4. South Korea KAAV-II Three types of chassis are proposed. Variant 1 has basic armor with turret at rear half, dimension is (LXWXH in meter) 9x3.6x3.1, turret dimension would be 2.2x1.6x0.6, Crew 3 and 20 infantrymen, engine will have 1500HP. It will bend bow flap and engine will be located on the forward and waterjet on the side of the vehicle. Variant 2 and 3 are similar to each other but with minor difference. Variant 2 use composite armor and use Vshape bow flap while Variant 3 use basic armor bend shaped bow flap. Dimension for 2 and 3 is 9.4x3.5x3 and turret dimension is 1.8x1.7x0.6, with crew of 3 and 20 infantrymen and engine hp will be 2700. Turret will be located on front half and engine will be located in the rear and waterjet in the interior. Proposed turret from left to right, K21, CTA manned turret, and CTA unmanned turret hell that's a lot of seats also boasted MT-883 to 2700hp, yeesh
  5. Anti-air bobcat design to take away driver's hearing in maximum efficiency SH11 155mm SPG
  6. 300rpm 76mm autocannon i bet this is how this thing sounds like when it fire
  7. No,Russian don't always uses inline and their radial one (Lavochkin) are as good as the yaks and maybe even better. Ki-84 and N1K both are better than Zero yes but what can they do? N1K fight P51H in 1944 with 620km/h top speed?what is he going to wait P51H to turn and cut it with katana? lmao Ki-84 is the only one that worth getting some credit, since it actually can match F6F,TAIC doesn't care about Ki-84,and giving the estimate report 156A that is totally contradiction to other report like F-1M-1119C-ND (which also is estimate but marked as fucking FACUTAL, TWAT). BUT that's it it can't even dive right, it's just a shit that is better than the existing shit (Zero) It never reach 687km/h since it's the misread of 156A and F-1M-1119C-ND Bushido won't help them, turning rate won't help em. Koyama himself knows better than you Jap plane fan ,he decide to rise wing load and weight exchange horizontal maneuverability to high speed performance. that's all, Ha-45 cannot give 1900 horse power. And Hayate is just a broken dream. There goes the end of the story.
  8. better plane my ass,go found a japanese fighter plane that can stably reach 650km/h. NOT EVEN ONE. Russian can do it with weak engine, why won't japanese? trash is trash
×
×
  • Create New...