Jump to content
Please support this forum by joining the SH Patreon ×
Sturgeon's House

Andrei_bt

Scrublord
  • Posts

    174
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    6

Everything posted by Andrei_bt

  1. Armor protection of the tanks of the second postwar generation T-64 (T-64A), Chieftain Mk5P and M60 Technical data on soviet 1-st post WW2 generation of tanks, Like T-54, T-55 and T-62 are well known and well described in literature. But what if Soviet “premium” tanks of 70-s era were engaged into real combat against western tanks in Europre. This article provides description of "Object 432" (T-64) and T-64A tank combined protection (composite armor, anti radiation and chemical protection) in comparison to western designed tanks – “Chieftain” Mk5P and M60A1. Information on T-64 protection includes technical project (presentation) dated 1961 and technical drawings from various periods. Information on “Chieftain” Mk5P and M60A1 tanks is a result of study of captured tanks delivered to USSR in 1970s and beginning of 1980-s, published in technical reports of that period. The importance of information is the common testing criteria based on Soviet approach to tanks testing and protection design. This article contains mostly direct citations of facts and numbers published in reports with some comments. Well, suppose this is a useless task. Prepared a first article in English, but translating this materials is very complex task in question of terms. Will be grateful is anybody assist in corrections of this material (terms and so on). http://btvt.info/3attackdefensemobility/432armor_eng.htm
  2. So the United Arab Emirates ordered German explosive reactive armor for ~125 million Euros. Does anybody know where this is going to be used? Maybe on the Leclerc or BMP-3? What is the source of this ?
  3. In 90-s Kobra GL ATGM became quite obsolete, so this was a good idea withou limitation of gun calibre and missile size. Some sort of flashback to 60-s era Malutka equiped tanks.
  4. I will translate it soon, briefly Soviets acquired live M60A1 in 70-s and Chieftain in early 80-s. They studied them very closely in all areas. Concerning armor they discovered that Chieftain is not that evil monster they considered. It has maximal 250 mm armor LOS and can be penetrated by T-55 from 500 m, from T-62 from 1600 m and from T-64-72-80 from 3 000 m.
  5. Yes it is local effect (close to the shape charge jet) but it has habit to reflect from tnak internal surfeces.
  6. Concerning shaped charge Beyond-armour effect. The results of soviet tests in 1968 (development of integrated ERA) using pressure sensors and rabbits. In case of penetration of 115 mm HEAT round inside the testing rig sensors recorded overpressure with an amplitude of 0.4 kg / cm2. Such overpressure can be considered dangerous for humans. http://andrei-bt.livejournal.com/469619.html
  7. Of course can be biger, but tanks do not find like ancient knights at 0 degree head on.
  8. Well, no one said "it was not developed by Russian emigres". But the information of idea of ERA itself is more than possible passed with Blazer. To many coinsidenses.
  9. In Soviets protection estimates only 30 degree was taken into account, so it has modest 420 mm vs APFSDS.
  10. Well, it's official story. Maybe it is correct, maybe not. It is hard to compare level of Dr. Held works with the Soviet ones which were state supported. From 1968 to 1975 about 100 000 people migrated from USSR to Israel, it is said the one who was mentioned in 1968 report among the Soviet ERA developer is among them.
  11. Thanks for comment, but these are documents, not just someone's opinion. So we have the development of ERA in USSR . It started in 1940-s (first published in 1949). In 1968 test with above mentioned report. One of the developers has the name Blazer. Later he repatriated from USSR to his historical motherland.
  12. ---Can you please explain this a bit more? According to R. Lindström, the T-80U send to the Swedish tests had essentially the same armor, just slightly different thickness. Hi! I can not explain what did they send to Sweeden, just it's not wat was in T-80U-UD. it's early 219A like on a drawing well known for years. But the above mentioned Swedish picture describes the overall design rather good. Cast plates with holes in them (both sides) filled with resin.
  13. Actualy to understand this pic it is not t-80U or UD, it's early 219A Red is cast metal Yellow is a resin and it is not correct.
  14. Actually it did not lacked the weak point around the driver's position, but it was reduced. It's clear from inside photos. But the level depends on variants.
×
×
  • Create New...