Jump to content
Please support this forum by joining the SH Patreon ×
Sturgeon's House

chebuRUSHka

Scrublord
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    42

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by chebuRUSHka

  1. chebuRUSHka
    http://tankarchives.blogspot.de/2013/02/accuracy.html http://tankarchives.blogspot.de/2013/05/accuracy-revisited.html First he begins with a strawman argument in order to make everyone with a different opinion look like a clueless fan boy. Then he shows some documents, like all slavaboos do, in order to demonstrate his intellectual superiority. Too bad he doesn't know Germans used the 50% criterion, where as Soviet union used standard deviation or срединные отклонение. He lacks the formal education to understand his sources, but he talks down on people who don't share his opinion. It's really pathetic.
  2. chebuRUSHka
    This is a terrible source my friend.
  3. chebuRUSHka
    So some Russian designer doesn't know this is a South Korean tank and not a Russian one.
  4. chebuRUSHka
    What?
  5. chebuRUSHka
    Hello, thanks for your reply. I know that site, but unfortunately there is no formula I'm aware of, which works for all penetrators. There are some formulas which work for modern sabots, but not for sabots from the 60s. Are you sure longrods.ch can handle 60s/early-70s sabots?
  6. chebuRUSHka
    Fair enough. For me the Leopard 2K is just a rebrand. I fail to see any substantial difference besides the gun. Back to topic now: Does anyone have more penetration values or a formula, for 30° and 0°?
  7. chebuRUSHka
    Like i wrote there were different versions:
  8. chebuRUSHka
    Yes. That tank was called Keiler. There was also a version with the 120mm L44. The interesting characteristic about the Keiler was its power-to-weight ratio. At only 40 tonnes this tank was carrying the mighty 1500hp engine from the Leo2, resulting in 37.5 hp/t.
  9. chebuRUSHka
    Thanks. So am I right assuming this M1A1+ had better frontal protection than the M1A1HC?
  10. chebuRUSHka
    What did have a "second generation armor package"? The 1986 prototype or the 1992 version? Isn't the "second generation armor package" is what's on the M1A1?
  11. chebuRUSHka
    Sorry which CIA dump? Please provide a link.
  12. chebuRUSHka
    According to many websites the first M1A2 was built in 1986, although it's not clear if they are talking about a prototype or not. The mass production happened somewhere between 1986 and 1992, if they are correct. http://www.fprado.com/armorsite/abrams.htm http://www.tanks-encyclopedia.com/coldwar/US/M1_Abrams.php
  13. chebuRUSHka
    Was the armour of the M1A2 improved between 1986 and 1992?
  14. chebuRUSHka
    What's a MBT 78?
  15. chebuRUSHka
    This or it was fired from a ETC gun. I remember there was a test with a type B or C ETC gun by 2002.
  16. chebuRUSHka
    Which year?
  17. chebuRUSHka
    Hello, I was wondering what were the Rh-105 penetration capabilities with 60s and 70s ammo? This is the only information i found thus far: Thank you sovngard! 130mm @ 60° @ 2000m 150mm @ 60° @ 800m What about 100m and 1000m? What about 0°?
  18. chebuRUSHka
    Hello guys, I have some questions about the Leopard 2A5 prototypes. How do the TVMs and the KVT compare to the Leopard 2A5, when it come to armour? The KVT was build using a Leo2A4 fromt the 5th batch(1985), so it should have less armour than the 2A5, because those used the 1988 or 1991 armour package, right? The TVMs were build using a Leo2A4 fromt the 8th batch, so it should have the same frontal armour as the 2A5, right? The TVMs had improved roof armour, but i mostly care about the front and side protection. Did they all share the same FCS? I know that the TVM-Max had a different PERI and a different thermal imager, but what about the rest? Same ballistics computer and sensors?
×
×
  • Create New...