Jump to content
Please support this forum by joining the SH Patreon ×
Sturgeon's House

2805662

Contributing Members
  • Posts

    688
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    52

Everything posted by 2805662

  1. I’d say “less efficient protection”, not less protection. Common to all IFV-based light tanks/tank destroyers/insert your semantic preference here, Lynx 120 has protected volume it doesn’t need for its role. As the volume to be protected is high, relative to that needed by a purpose designed tank or light tank. the overall level of protection is lower.
  2. A little more on the armour package “Epsom” for CR3:
  3. Interoperability testing for amphibious operations on Sydney harbour.
  4. Public confirmation of the trial fit of Soucy composite rubber tracks on Lynx. Rumoured vibration/noise issues with Lynx were the apparent precipitating issue that lead to this previously-unscheduled activity. https://twitter.com/dtrmag/status/1460807378463428610?s=21
  5. UK 120mm projectile & propellant procurement: ”21 October 2021 The CHARM 3 operational round (L27) was last procured in September 2001 and its associated propelling charge (L17) in November 2010. The CHARM 3 practice round (L29) was last procured in April 2009 and its associated propelling charge (L18) in February 2010.” https://www.ukdefencenews.co.uk/2021/10/ammunition-procurement/?amp=1&__twitter_impression=true
  6. Ha! The Iron Fist integration test does seem to use a M113 hull.
  7. With the conclusion of the RMA field piece on 8 October, Hanwha has released a wrap up video. They’re sticking to their perceived strengths: demonstrated Iron Fist & Spike LR2 integration. Would like to see Rheinmetall release something similar.
  8. Sounds like it’s been quite the journey to mature Iron Fist on Bradley. https://www.defensenews.com/land/2021/10/12/after-pumping-the-brakes-army-moves-to-field-iron-fist-protection-system-on-bradley/
  9. Related to the previous discussion of Iron Fist: ”The Army has encountered technical problems and funding gaps in its effort to field an active protection system on the Bradley Infantry Fighting Vehicle — but service officials say they’re now moving forward. The Iron Fist system has completed the majority of required testing, Brig. Gen. Glenn Dean, the program executive officer for Army ground combat systems, told Defense News.” https://www.defensenews.com/land/2021/10/12/after-pumping-the-brakes-army-moves-to-field-iron-fist-protection-system-on-bradley/
  10. As a temporary measure until the turret motor is replaced with the upgraded model.
  11. The “Best & Final Offers” (BAFO) for both Hanwha’s & Rheinmetall’s Phase 3 bids went in this last week. Another step on the journey.
  12. Manufacture of “major components” of the Mk30-2/ABM to be undertaken by Thales Lithgow. Hope Rheinmetall has their IP locked down!
  13. Worth understanding the basis of the US-UK nuclear technology sharing agreement from 1958: 1958 Mutual Agreement This more or less requires UK participation in any agreement by the US with a third party if it concerns nuclear submarine propulsion. Personally, I don’t see Astute or an Astute derivative in Australian service.
  14. More on the T-2000: https://asiapacificdefencereporter.com/eos-continues-to-build-sovereign-live-fire-test-capability/
  15. More images of the representative & somewhat agricultural CR3 Trophy fit.
  16. I’m going to hide behind a technicality: there’s a MIV on the RBSL stand adjacent their CR3 3 w/Trophy.
  17. Ah least three Boxers will be on display at DSEI: a straight MIV, RCH155, & the bridge module.
  18. Good clarifying information @SH_MM : I guess we’ll see. One thing is certain (need to find the link) is that only 17 kits/conversions have been funded. Contrast that with the Abrams fit where several battalion sets have been purchased. We’ve also seen the Abrams fit out on M1A1 FEP & M1A2 SEPv2, which demonstrates the modularity of the base tank, as well as the kit.
×
×
  • Create New...