Karamazov

3 hours ago, Beer said:

Temsah is clearly different vehicle. 

yeah, u are right 
Some russian Ural-based MRAP. May be early model or somethink 

If anyone needs it, then this MRAP is called TEMSAH. Egyptian production

Probably M8 light tank in production

11 hours ago, Serge said:

This is the problem with the Swedish test. 

What is you mean? False information or test specifics?

5 minutes ago, 2805662 said:

Plan 2,000 litres every 8 hours,  per tank. 

Thanks. That is, was planned he consumed a full tank of fuel every 8 hours. 

Does anyone have more or less reliable information on the cruising range of the M1A2 tanks?
This became interesting against the background of unverified information that in Iraq they were refueled every 150km.

23 minutes ago, Marsh said:

As far as I know, no. I seem to remember this was used as part of the marketing campaign for Blazer ERA, relativity primitive as it was.

thank you

20 minutes ago, Beer said:

Because they got the tank/tanks from Hungary I presume. 

As far as I know, Hungary has a T-72A, but this is a T-72M. May be they got this T-72 from Poland with Hungary transit. idk.

13 hours ago, Wiedzmin said:

Was the armor pierced?

14 hours ago, Wiedzmin said:

maybe somebody have more info on T-72 trials in Austria ? or more photos?

why does the text talk about Hungary? Hungary did not produce them. And the tank at the photo is Polish, apparently

what time are these photos taken? is it a bradley with a new suspension?

35 minutes ago, Beer said:

It is T-84AB1

By the way, is there a difference between M-84AB1 and AS? or the difference is only in the name?
I remember that the "AS" has a panoramic sight over the main sight. But "AB1" - not.

1 hour ago, Dan said:

T-90 A

No, that's right, this is a deep modernization of the Yugoslav M-84 in Serbia with the assistance of Russia.

It is easy to distinguish it from the T-90A in the lower glacis part

The 90A have lgp like this:

On the T-90A there are mounts for engineering mechanisms, but on the M-84 they are not.

7 minutes ago, N-L-M said:

There is no reason to believe ARAT 2 has ceramics, it's a single curved ERA tile.

To clarify, M32 is the ARAT 2 reactive tile.

Sorry for misleading.
Yes you are right. Maybe these plates have ceramics in their composition, as i heard, but they are definitely ERA.

4 hours ago, Wiedzmin said:

tank with anti RPG mesh have full set

saved a couple of thousand rubles for ice cream
as usual

10 hours ago, N-L-M said:

That's ARAT 2, which is also ERA.

ARAT II this is ARAT ERA with cover of ceramic plates. 
But the turret's sides have no ERA elements. Because you may be right:

10 hours ago, N-L-M said:

Covers the hull ARAT 1 and the bare turret side, thus again suggesting that the turret side is equivalent to the ARAT 1 skirts.

But the turret side cant protect against tandem missiles, i think, and for this they just use plates only.

56 minutes ago, Beer said:

Who is using PSO kit? Are there any ARAT-2 equipped Abramses anywhere outside Iraq? Never saw any in photos from Europe but I may have missed them. 

In Afghanistan, Danish and Canadian tanks were equipped with full side armor modules. This is not PSO, but smth like it. 
The fact is that the United States and Europe have the opportunity to equip their tanks and IFV with modular side protection. 

45 minutes ago, N-L-M said:

So, ARAT -1 only covers the hull sides, which suggests that whatever those skirts are rated for, the turret side can already stop.

Not only. But, as i know, turret sides have no ERA, ceramic plates only

6 hours ago, Beer said:

It's still 100% more ERA covered than Abrams M1A2 or Leopard 2A7. Isn't it? 

This problem is completely solved by the use of TUSK II and PSO kits. 

1 hour ago, Wiedzmin said:

if the blocks can flip down there is a lagre gap, if not, whole unprotected area is even bigger(like on green 90M in factory)

maybe they have not yet been installed?

51 minutes ago, Wiedzmin said:

ERA covered area level - genius...

what do you mean?

2 hours ago, SH_MM said:

Leopard 2A7+ Urban Operations and Leopard 2A7+ Duel Operations.

After all, how to distinguish them? Maybe you have some photos?

On 2/16/2020 at 9:16 PM, LoooSeR said:

Object 480 mockups together.

the second looks like Obj.476 

1 hour ago, LoooSeR said:

ZTZ-99s

i think this is 96, isnt it?