Jump to content
Sturgeon's House

Gun Ready

Contributing Members
  • Content Count

    112
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Gun Ready

  1. I got these photos from a friend participating at a symposium taking snapshots from slides presented by German army procurement officer. They identify the following technology study topics for survivability: active hard kill protection system, passive and reactive armour, combined protection system (whatever this means), and encapsulated crew compartment.
  2. No, DOR, DOC and DOR are French abbreviations from French DGA and / or MOD. FFF means Fähigkeitslücke und funktionale Forderungen, AWF means abschliessende wehrtechnische Forderungen.
  3. The time schedule requests for different phases: technology demonstrator phase till 2023 and then a total system demonstrator till 2027. This phases are controlled by the German FFF and AWF and the French DOR, DOC and DLR. @Alzoc can you tell what the French agency abbreviations mean?
  4. Thanks for your quick assessment! Do you think that the EMBT presented at Eurosatory could be a starting point for MGCS? Nexter and KMW started "to train to work together" whatever this means. And the question will be what impression the procurement agencies (DGA and Beschaffungsamt) will get from the future "work together". The Germans might not be so happy as Rheinmetall will get than a minor role in this game. Let's see how the first design study will look like which you expect to show up mid 2019.
  5. What do we hear about LoI? The German and French authorities should hurry up. Otherwise the political intention will be lost and the companies involved at both sides of the Rhine will run side by side the same way with different products. Would not be the first time: AMX30 vs Leopard 1, Leclerc vs Leopard 2 ... What next? Leclerc Scorpion vs Leopard 2 A8. @Alzoc give me you opinion!
  6. @SH_MM Sounds plausible! Thanks for your patent search.
  7. I don't believe that KMW is really using "Schüttgut" like @SH_MM assumes. I think they are using classical NERA protection design against RPGs. This is also good against blast IED, EFPs and art frags as far as I learned. So I state that they are using the same tech as IBD but in there own design and own manufactured.
  8. It would be not a good selection for the Swedish Army if they would go for Leclerc as it is not in production any more and according to @Serge would need three years for restart. I believe that no Swedish tank officer would like this tank as this army refused it in 1993. They love their Strv122. If they would have an actual need for barrels (what I cannot imagine BTW) they could do an upgrade of the Strv121 to Strv122 or something similar as a Leo 2A7V. They got originally 160 Leo 2A4 from the German Army. So they have enough to retrofit even if a few of them are used for conversion to bridgel
  9. @Renegade334 as you can see your EDIT hint is working, thanks a lot!
  10. Look to the front track skirts, they are not as with Leopard A7, they are more like Leopard A4M Canada, see pic above
  11. @Renegade334 many thanks for your help! Can you also provide help for inserting .jpg in this editor using android?
  12. Can somebody give help how to insert .jpg images into this editor with Android tablet
  13. @SH_MM https://www.army-technology.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2017/09/4I-image-85.jpg This is Wisent 2 AEV Canada, protection designed by KMW.
  14. Same with the AEV 2 Canada (armoured engineer vehicle Wiesent 2 not Bergepanzer 2!). Also this attached armour was developed, qualified and manufactured from KMW! Ask FFG whether one part is from IBD.
  15. Who told you that KMW is not developing its own special armour. This statement is pure speculation. Even if they are not doing high promotion (to whom should they do it unless to their potential customers) they have it in their companies slogan: "protects your mission". And believe me, the Leopard 2 A4M CAN protection comes solely from KMW and not any part at all was from your hotly favoured company IBD.
  16. @SH_MM It seem that you believe that IBD Deisenroth has the only and best armour solutions for Leopard 2 tanks! One may even think you are sponsored by this company to promote their solutions. But let me give some statements: Rumours in the protection community are saying that IBD reaches the end of the line as Ulf Deisenroth, the brilliant armour developer, passed by in 2015 and his wife and his two daughters want to sell the company (what they partly did with Chempro and ADS to Rheinmetall). Yes, he did great work for Leopard 2 protection but that's over since the Swedish MBT122 p
  17. 2A6 are 2A5 turrets which just got the L55 barrel. The 2A6M got mine protection in addition and the 2A7 got some additional features like auxiliary power supply.
  18. Hopefully not as they are an integral part of the complete armour package! They L2A5 got the internal packages changed to "D" technology.
  19. As far as I understood the integrated modules had not be changed due to lack of money! Correct?
  20. @Valryon with your estimation the add-on armour of the 2PL is just 4 tons as the 2A4 is 55 tons. So the Hungarian Army did the better choice with the 2A7+ having protection as the 2A5 at the turret, frontal protection at the chassis as the Danish 2A5 and mine protection. All this with less than 64 tons. Of course this is a much more expensive solution and can be done only by the OEM in a new built tank but is best for the threat of today and tomorrow! Congratulations to the Magyars.
  21. The photos of the Leopard 2 PL from Valryon show that the chassis is still kept at the Leopard 2 A4 configuration. That add-on armour on the turret looks to be more for all-around protection against RPG and not so much against frontal HEAT protection. The total weight of that vehicle would be interesting to know. Has anybody some figures?
×
×
  • Create New...