-
Posts
204 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
21
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Gallery
Downloads
Events
Posts posted by Clan_Ghost_Bear
-
-
Something similar to the SETC, but with Greece only. The US unit took 2nd place.
-
-
20 minutes ago, Beer said:
How about ammo stowage of that concept?
Maybe it has a secondary ammo storage in the rear hull, that replenishes the bustle magazine? It's what they did with the M1 CATTB.
-
-
-
7 minutes ago, alanch90 said:
I´m argentinian. This is gonna cause a political uproar.
I'd assume from Argentina being flat broke, or is it something different?
-
-
-
5 hours ago, Rico said:
One main point I see why 2A7V could not be an option is weight. Driving in heavy snow with ~70t could be tricky
Any chance of them going with the EMBT?
-
Seems silly to completely ditch tanks. What happened to the Marine MPF buy?
-
http://www.sgex.eb.mil.br/sistemas/be/copiar.php?codarquivo=976&act=sep
These are (supposedly) Brazil's requirements for a new MBT.
-
https://insidedefense.com/insider/jette-says-original-competitors-intend-recompete-omfv
11 competitors have reached out to the Army about the new OMFV.
-
58 minutes ago, skylancer-3441 said:
IIRC there are like one single render published on GDLS proposal
Do you have it perchance?
-
26 minutes ago, DIADES said:
So when did they last win new platform work?
If MPF counts as new enough. Though neither BAE nor GDLS has shown much of anything new in the ground vehicle world lately, mostly because there's been no necessity. I think BAE's last new showing was this:
-
Just now, TokyoMorose said:
That's just the contract legalese, actual vehicle requirements are tab 2 of attachment 0045, which I have not found.
Sorry about that. Would be interesting to know what the specific requirement was that made it unattainable.
-
3 minutes ago, TokyoMorose said:
I would bet money if I had it, that the requirements list was in the recent DoD tradition; being simply absurd and couldn't be met reasonably - and everything else is saving face for that
Not sure if this has been posted here before, but googling around I found the draft RFP:
-
A new MICV for Japan's Ground Self-Defense Force. Appears very similar to the Type 89.
-
Was there anything about OMFV in that presentation?
-
1 hour ago, MRose said:
FCS isn't too sci-fi today.
I'm not so sure about that. APS is only now starting to get good and there aren't any systems (that I'm aware of at least) that can do KE reliably.
-
-
Incredibly stupid when there's already a 120mm designed for lighter vehicles that has been built and tested.
-
https://ndiastorage.blob.core.usgovcloudapi.net/ndia/2003/gun/mosh.pdf
Details about a 40MM supershot round that was being developed for the Bushmaster II as part of the FCS program.
-
Kind of a shame that the army is moving away from turbines.
-
https://www.janes.com/article/93094/croatia-to-receive-m2a2-ods-bradley-ifvs-from-us
Seems the earlier article was somewhat accurate.
Contemporary Western Tank Rumble!
in Mechanized Warfare
Posted
2 Leopard 2A4s (One of which came in first) and 2 2A6 from Greece, along with the Abrams.
https://veteranos.gr/protefse-o-oulamos-tis-chchi-ttht-ston-diagonismo-armaton-tank-challenge-2020/