Jump to content
Please support this forum by joining the SH Patreon ×
Sturgeon's House

DeXM

Contributing Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    17

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

DeXM last won the day on March 22 2023

DeXM had the most liked content!

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

DeXM's Achievements

Contributing Member

Contributing Member (2/3)

3

Reputation

  1. DeXM
    Those are 96's
  2.    Laviduce reacted to a post in a topic: The Soviet Tank Thread: Transversely Mounted 1000hp Engines
  3. DeXM
    T-90M's reversing somewhere
  4.    DeXM reacted to a post in a topic: Vehicles of the PLA: Now with refreshing new topic title!
  5.    DeXM reacted to a post in a topic: Vehicles of the PLA: Now with refreshing new topic title!
  6.    DeXM reacted to a post in a topic: Ukrainian armor - Oplot-M, T-64M Bulat and other.
  7.    DeXM reacted to a post in a topic: Ukrainian armor - Oplot-M, T-64M Bulat and other.
  8.    DeXM reacted to a post in a topic: Ukrainian armor - Oplot-M, T-64M Bulat and other.
  9.    DeXM reacted to a post in a topic: Ukrainian armor - Oplot-M, T-64M Bulat and other.
  10.    DeXM reacted to a post in a topic: Ukrainian armor - Oplot-M, T-64M Bulat and other.
  11. DeXM
    In general, is there any information about the structure of the packages? Thickness, I suppose is "located" between 200mmm-225mm, I suppose that there should be at least 80-100mm composite layers between the opening sheet (20-40 mm) of steel and closing (80-100mm) steel sheet? In addition, by photographs, as far as I can judge, the upper frontal part ZTZ99A "returned" to the angle of about 68 degrees against ~ 70 used on ZTZ99? And it is quite possible that the thickness has been increased? For example, up to ~ 235-240mm?
  12. DeXM
    I'm not sure but could these documents be related with ZTZ98 armor packages? https://www.doc88.com/p-9793516939542.html https://www.doc88.com/p-7374950723088.html
  13.    Laviduce reacted to a post in a topic: Vehicles of the PLA: Now with refreshing new topic title!
  14.    Beer reacted to a post in a topic: Vehicles of the PLA: Now with refreshing new topic title!
  15. DeXM
    That may be posted before, but the video was deleted and now it's finally here: 11:55 we can see VT4's reversing It's about 20-25 kph, but I'm not sure whether he continued to accelerate when the border of the frame
  16. DeXM
  17. DeXM
    It seems that I will need to try to contact the object-477. Is it possible to contact him? Perhaps he has documentary evidence? I have a full version, just cut out this paragraph to do more clearly. Are there any documentary confirmation? Just in all sources that I found about CH1000 (99A) it was argued that the gear of the reverse - 3, but for some serious documentary evidence, I did not find it (and I'm not sure if they were in public domain) P.S. Sorry, I forgot to place link to the video From 12:20
  18. DeXM
    Are there any perspective APFSDS development processes? Also found video from VT, but on the moment when the car begins to take back, the frame shifts on the military I found some comparison for BM Oplot and VT-4. It says about CH1000B transmisson. Previosly, I saw some photos So, it says about CH1000B too. Is it possible that the difference between the CH1000 (99a) from the CH1000B (vT4) is that on 99A (presumably, since I still did not find documentary evidence or video with a demonstration) - three reverse speeds transmission, unlike two at VT? And I'd like to clarify if theres full video of this screenshot? P.S. And I found original, 12:20, It's clearly seen
  19. DeXM
    Thanks for clarifying the situation I'll try to find out more details and information
  20. DeXM
    Yes, the length confuses me. Nevertheless, I did not find detailed measurements, so I use those data that is. There is also a measure of the APFSDS Phase 2. Looks more real, in my opinion, taking into account photo with both rounds
  21. DeXM
    And I would like to clarify whether there is more than one photo?
  22. DeXM
    I saw photos, and even video with DTC10-125. In my opinion, the projectile is very powerful. If these "measurements" are correct, then, at the initial speed of 1780-1800 meters per second, this shell can already exceed 3BM60 (with its initial flight speed of 1660 meters). So we may expect at least 300mm+/60
  23. DeXM
    I try to "filter" the information as much as my current awareness level allows. I will give an example with a transmission: Yes, I found mention that 99a - three reversing transmission (what I wrote earlier), however, I did not find full-fledged documentary evidence (or I simply did not find the place where This could be done, due to the fact that I still can not fully read in Chinese). Therefore, you have to collect the information "on the grains". P. S. wanted to ask what is the real limit on the length of the UPFSD used for autoloaders 99 and 99a? 740mm from after refinement, as on Soviet and Russian tanks, or will it be the opportunity to use the APFSDS even greater elongation? Also, I would like to ask if there are information about future projectiles that should replace the APFSDS Phase 3 (DTC10-125)?
  24.    DeXM reacted to a post in a topic: Vehicles of the PLA: Now with refreshing new topic title!
  25.    DeXM reacted to a post in a topic: Vehicles of the PLA: Now with refreshing new topic title!
  26. DeXM
    Oh, thank you, now I see
  27. DeXM
    Thank you. In general, I wanted to know if there are any details on this photo? Seemingly testing 125mm APFSDS. It's about 854mm LOS, which means 427mm/60, so it's getting closer to 829A3/A4 level, but I don't have more detailed information (and I'm not even sure if it was about 125mm) ..
×
×
  • Create New...