LostCosmonaut Posted April 6, 2016 Report Share Posted April 6, 2016 The KC-46 is an aerial refueling aircraft based on the 767 airframe. It was the winner of the USAF's KC-X contract, and is intended to replace (partially) the KC-135, a 707 based aircraft which is very old. The contract award process was a colossal shitshow, featuring proposals based on the 767, A330, and An-70, and involving numerous protests, lawsuits, and other crap. However, the Boeing entry ultimately won. Unfortunately; the aircraft is now having difficulty refueling large aircraft such as the C-17; https://www.flightglobal.com/news/articles/boeings-kc-46-test-run-complicated-by-c-17-refuelli-423831/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Belesarius Posted April 6, 2016 Report Share Posted April 6, 2016 I thought Tanker technology was fairly mature. How do you fuck it up as badly as they appear to have? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Donward Posted April 6, 2016 Report Share Posted April 6, 2016 When you have Senator Patty Murray and Senator John McCain involved in the process, all bets are fucking off. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vanagandr Posted April 8, 2016 Report Share Posted April 8, 2016 So, it's always seemed super remarkable to me that it is possible to control an aircraft with enough precision to land a stick into a small hole on another plane while in flight. Is this as difficult and nerve-racking as it seems, or is it relatively easy to accomplish? I imagine that electronic assistance helps a decent amount. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.