Priory_of_Sion Posted October 21, 2016 Report Share Posted October 21, 2016 Over/under on the amount of times state department employees have been rickrolled/goatsed? Taking bets now. At least 5 times a day for each employee Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Belesarius Posted October 21, 2016 Report Share Posted October 21, 2016 http://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2016-election/trump-foundation-paid-activist-filmmaker-james-o-keefe-n670381?utm_source=fark What a surprise. Being reported O'Keefe was paid $10gs by the Trump Campaign. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ramlaen Posted October 21, 2016 Report Share Posted October 21, 2016 At an unspecified time, disclosed before Trump even announced his candidacy. But hey, that totally invalidates Democrat operatives admission of electoral fraud and instigating violence. T___A, Jeeps_Guns_Tanks and Sturgeon 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ApplesauceBandit Posted October 21, 2016 Report Share Posted October 21, 2016 John Podesta's password: p@ssw0rd lol That looks to me more like a default password since it sounds like it's for a computer that Podesta hasn't used yet. Can't recall if I mentioned it already or not, but his password for Twitter and Apple and all that wasn't much better anyways. You don't need pro Russian hackers to get into their stuff Priory_of_Sion, AdmiralTheisman and Sturgeon 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Belesarius Posted October 21, 2016 Report Share Posted October 21, 2016 How to Harness Twitter for your fundraising efforts. http://money.cnn.com/2016/10/20/technology/troll-trump-fundraising-tool/index.html?iid=ob_homepage_tech_pool&utm_source=fark&utm_medium=website&utm_content=link&ICID=ref_fark Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sturgeon Posted October 21, 2016 Report Share Posted October 21, 2016 Her latest method for laundering bribery money is pretty lame. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ShamefurDispray Posted October 21, 2016 Report Share Posted October 21, 2016 How to Harness Twitter for your fundraising efforts. http://money.cnn.com/2016/10/20/technology/troll-trump-fundraising-tool/index.html?iid=ob_homepage_tech_pool&utm_source=fark&utm_medium=website&utm_content=link&ICID=ref_fark "Make Trump pay for his offensive words" ??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ApplesauceBandit Posted October 21, 2016 Report Share Posted October 21, 2016 "Make Trump pay for his offensive words" ??? "Pay Hillary for Trump's offensive words" Sturgeon and T___A 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sturgeon Posted October 22, 2016 Report Share Posted October 22, 2016 "Pay Hillary for Trump's offensive words" That's like this election in microcosm! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sturgeon Posted October 22, 2016 Report Share Posted October 22, 2016 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sturgeon Posted October 23, 2016 Report Share Posted October 23, 2016 This was a better video than I expected: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike E Posted October 23, 2016 Report Share Posted October 23, 2016 This was a better video than I expected: Sargon is pretty based on these type of videos. He doesn't know jack about economics or even some political functions though. Sturgeon 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sturgeon Posted October 23, 2016 Report Share Posted October 23, 2016 Sargon is pretty based on these type of videos. He doesn't know jack about economics or even some political functions though. Yeah, I've been really surprised by how good some of his videos on Hillary have been. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Priory_of_Sion Posted October 23, 2016 Report Share Posted October 23, 2016 Yeah, I've been really surprised by how good some of his videos on Hillary have been. Did he imply that going to war will lead to the spread terror, unstabalize the region, and cause humanitarian disasters unless you go to war with Russia at the end? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sturgeon Posted October 23, 2016 Report Share Posted October 23, 2016 Did he imply that going to war will lead to the spread terror, unstabalize the region, and cause humanitarian disasters unless you go to war with Russia at the end? I didn't get that impression... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Priory_of_Sion Posted October 23, 2016 Report Share Posted October 23, 2016 I didn't get that impression... Meh. I agree with his main premise that Hillary Clinton likes to use America's military power as the tool to resolve much of America's foreign policy issues. Yet, he speaks relatively positively for cooperation with Russia and backing of Middle Eastern authoritarian regimes like Assad's. I don't see how that is much different from American backing of Saudi Arabia and then cooperating with our allies like the UK and France. In the long run, you'll probably get the same results. Hypothetically you could get Europe, Russia, Iran, Saudi Arabia, etc all allied with the US without tensions tearing that alliance apart to defeat terror, but that's basically something that will only happen in some dorky alt-history scenario. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sturgeon Posted October 23, 2016 Report Share Posted October 23, 2016 Meh. I agree with his main premise that Hillary Clinton likes to use America's military power as the tool to resolve much of America's foreign policy issues. Yet, he speaks relatively positively for cooperation with Russia and backing of Middle Eastern authoritarian regimes like Assad's. I don't see how that is much different from American backing of Saudi Arabia and then cooperating with our allies like the UK and France. In the long run, you'll probably get the same results. Hypothetically you could get Europe, Russia, Iran, Saudi Arabia, etc all allied with the US without tensions tearing that alliance apart to defeat terror, but that's basically something that will only happen in some dorky alt-history scenario. Difference is we don't get World War III... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Priory_of_Sion Posted October 23, 2016 Report Share Posted October 23, 2016 Difference is we don't get World War III... WWIII won't happen regardless... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sturgeon Posted October 23, 2016 Report Share Posted October 23, 2016 WWIII won't happen regardless... With the way Hillary seems to loathe Russia? I wouldn't bet on it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Priory_of_Sion Posted October 23, 2016 Report Share Posted October 23, 2016 With the way Hillary seems to loathe Russia? I wouldn't bet on it. She's not unique in her russophobia. She's basically every president since Wilson about her views on Russia. That's not good, but it is basically paranoia to believe she'll end civilization as we know it by being an idiot who doesn't understand basic deterrence. I'd bet on it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sturgeon Posted October 23, 2016 Report Share Posted October 23, 2016 She's not unique in her russophobia. She's basically every president since Wilson about her views on Russia. That's not good, but it is basically paranoia to believe she'll end civilization as we know it by being an idiot who doesn't understand basic deterrence. I'd bet on it. I think her career as SecState tells us she'll be much riskier in this regard than I'd be comfortable with. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sturgeon Posted October 23, 2016 Report Share Posted October 23, 2016 Lord_James 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Collimatrix Posted October 23, 2016 Report Share Posted October 23, 2016 This is the bestest thing. Belesarius 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Belesarius Posted October 23, 2016 Report Share Posted October 23, 2016 This is the bestest thing. Oh my. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike E Posted October 23, 2016 Report Share Posted October 23, 2016 Yet, he speaks relatively positively for cooperation with Russia and backing of Middle Eastern authoritarian regimes like Assad's. I don't see how that is much different from American backing of Saudi Arabia and then cooperating with our allies like the UK and France. In the long run, you'll probably get the same results. Hypothetically you could get Europe, Russia, Iran, Saudi Arabia, etc all allied with the US without tensions tearing that alliance apart to defeat terror, but that's basically something that will only happen in some dorky alt-history scenario. Assad is not in favor of a caliphate, that is one of the big differences. SA wants to expand outside of their borders, if not by taking territory -- by spreading ideology. This is why they publicly (basically) supported ISIL, Nusra and other such terrorist groups. Assad is not a nice guy, but he is not as sinister. I'd argue he'd be tame under Russian control regardless, too much to sacrifice if he is not. I think Russia has a good chance of uniting Syria, Iraq, and Iran. Maybe even Turkey if they are lucky. Saudi Arabia is a wildcard and always has been. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts