Impulse Posted December 26, 2016 Report Share Posted December 26, 2016 I found a formula on a Parabolic Nosecone -> V= Pi * d² * h : 8 (and additionally :1000 for mm³ in cm³ for g/cm³ calculation)The descripion notes that diffrent shapes of parabolic nosecones exist.The question is , for what version is the given formula?Quote: " K' = 0 for a cone , K' = 0.5 for a 1/2 parabola , K' = 0.75 for a 3/4 parabola , K' = 1 for a full parabola , For the case of the full Parabola (K'=1) the shape is tangent to the body at its base, and the base is on the axis of the parabola. Values of K' less than one result in a slimmer shape, whose appearance is similar to that of the secant ogive. The shape is no longer tangent at the base, and the base is parallel to, but offset from, the axis of the parabola."= is the given formula for a Tangent Ogive/ or another shape? + Is the "tangent" a true Tangent Ogive or just as quoted "tangent at its base"The reason for this question is that the formula results in a rather small volume, so a diffrent shape seems possible, (because a diffrent angle towards the base where the diameter is the largest, would result in high volume loss). + does anyone knows the formula for a truly tangent nosecone?Thanks for any answers. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LostCosmonaut Posted December 27, 2016 Report Share Posted December 27, 2016 Hello, I'm not sure which nosecone variety your formula corresponds to, it doesn't look like any that I am familiar with (although it might just be in a different form). Here is the formula for a tangent ogive (via wiki); This site also has a discussion; http://tmtpages.com/tech/tangent_ogive.htm Unless you make the ogive cover the whole semicircle, there will be a discontinuity in the curve at the nose (a point), is this what you meant by a true tangent ogive. For whatever reason, most of the results when you google "tangent ogive" relate to bullet design, surprisingly few about rocketry or aircraft. Then again, most rockets probably use Sears-Haack bodies, which have less drag but are more complex to construct. Finally, welcome to SH. Impulse 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Collimatrix Posted December 27, 2016 Report Share Posted December 27, 2016 Hi Impulse, welcome to SH. Have you taken Calculus? It's usually fairly straightforward to calculate the volume of a revolution of a curve. Impulse 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Oedipus Wreckx-n-Effect Posted December 27, 2016 Report Share Posted December 27, 2016 Hi Impulse, welcome to SH. Have you taken Calculus? It's usually fairly straightforward to calculate the volume of a revolution of a curve. Integrate a couple times in spherical or polar coordinates if I remembered right. Impulse 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Impulse Posted December 27, 2016 Author Report Share Posted December 27, 2016 Oh wow. For some reason it did not showed up at all in my notifications. Thanks for all the answers, i now gonna read trough it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Impulse Posted December 27, 2016 Author Report Share Posted December 27, 2016 @LostCosmonautIve read the site a few days ago, and calculated p a few weeks ago. Whats y for?A formula for V is hard to find i quess, but i have an idea. I tought about measuring my drawing, but its ofcourse too tiny, so i scale it up and draw it on quad paper with a string. Then slice the Ogive to dozends of cylinders and calcualte theyr volume. Thats gonna be a lot of math.Thanks everyone for taking a look and the answers. Great site, just donated 20$I commonly have my pc running over the day, so i propably now always have the site open.Im always open for conversations, basicly on any topics. While my main points of interest are in Military Smallarms and Ammunition. Eighter you use this as open thread/ make a group/ or write me if its superduper secret like that the .300blk actually isnt that great, or rare secrets like that 5.56x45 actually does (much) more than ".22cal holes". Thanks! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sturgeon Posted December 27, 2016 Report Share Posted December 27, 2016 The subforum you are looking for is "Infantry Tools & Tactics, I think. Belesarius 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LostCosmonaut Posted December 27, 2016 Report Share Posted December 27, 2016 @LostCosmonaut Ive read the site a few days ago, and calculated p a few weeks ago. Whats y for? A formula for V is hard to find i quess, but i have an idea. I tought about measuring my drawing, but its ofcourse too tiny, so i scale it up and draw it on quad paper with a string. Then slice the Ogive to dozends of cylinders and calcualte theyr volume. Thats gonna be a lot of math. Thanks everyone for taking a look and the answers. Great site, just donated 20$ I commonly have my pc running over the day, so i propably now always have the site open. Im always open for conversations, basicly on any topics. While my main points of interest are in Military Smallarms and Ammunition. Eighter you use this as open thread/ make a group/ or write me if its superduper secret like that the .300blk actually isnt that great, or rare secrets like that 5.56x45 actually does (much) more than ".22cal holes". Thanks! y is the distance from the centerline of the ogive to the outside (given by that formula). Basically, it's the radius of your ogive at any given point along it. For calculating the volume of it, I'd recommend learning calculus (hard and long), finding somebody who knows calc (probably shorter and easier), or using something like Wolfram Alpha; https://www.wolframalpha.com/ Here's that site calculating the volume of a parabolic nose cone with length 4, radius .75, and K = 1; https://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=volume+of+revolved+solid+.75*(2*(x%2F4)-(x%2F4)%5E2)+from+0+to+4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Impulse Posted December 27, 2016 Author Report Share Posted December 27, 2016 Ok than i already calculated y.I see what i can do with the links and compare weight results with the formula i found. Thanks Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Belesarius Posted December 28, 2016 Report Share Posted December 28, 2016 You also might want to search TFB (The Firearm Blog) for articles written by Nathaniel F. He has a lot of interesting stuff over there, and on his other blog, referenced/linked in the firearms section of this forum. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Impulse Posted December 28, 2016 Author Report Share Posted December 28, 2016 I did read almost everything of him on TFB. Im like 40times a day on there. Also did read everything on 196800rpm. Still thanks for recommending it in case.___NEW Topic: about Barrels-> whats the minimum wall thickness thats save for a chamber (55000psi). + what would be the smallest that even would hold up. And whats the wall thickness you would use on an automatic Rifle (not for the "automatic rifleman", just for a rifle that can technically shoot fullauto). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Impulse Posted December 28, 2016 Author Report Share Posted December 28, 2016 Tomorrow i will bring up a really interesting idea and topic, something im working on a while but never had the chance to talk about with the right people. Stay tuned. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Collimatrix Posted December 28, 2016 Report Share Posted December 28, 2016 ___NEW Topic: about Barrels-> whats the minimum wall thickness thats save for a chamber (55000psi). + what would be the smallest that even would hold up. And whats the wall thickness you would use on an automatic Rifle (not for the "automatic rifleman", just for a rifle that can technically shoot fullauto). Look up something called "hoop stress." The minimum necessary barrel thickness will be a function of the cross sectional area of the cartridge, the peak pressure of the cartridge, and the tensile yield strength of the steel times whatever safety factor. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Impulse Posted December 28, 2016 Author Report Share Posted December 28, 2016 Thanks. Did just read the definition of Hoop Stress, etc, known the physic behind it but not the math. Now found this calculator http://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/stress-thick-walled-tube-d_949.html, there seem to be no savety factor notes. Also theyr always called "calculation for thin/thick walled cylinder". Which one should i use thin/ or thick? Chamber: 55000psi , 10mm case diameter, 22mm Chamber diameter (6mm walls).Used data: 55000psi ; 14,69594878psi as standart atmospheric pressure ; 0,19685" inside radius ; 0,433071" outside radius ; 0,314961" radius to the middle of the wall.Axial Stress: 14304Hoop: 41376Radial Stress: -12767,5Does the results make sence? Is it safe/or unsafe with verry high quality steel? How to include savety factor. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Impulse Posted December 28, 2016 Author Report Share Posted December 28, 2016 Starting now to write on the topic i spoke of yesterday. Im done in one or a few hours, depending on if i get distracted.DONE: http://sturgeonshouse.ipbhost.com/index.php?/topic/1451-new-international-ammunition-classification-system%C2%AE-open-concept/#entry85617 have fun Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.