Jump to content
Please support this forum by joining the SH Patreon ×
Sturgeon's House

Recommended Posts

Are you sure the Caesars in Ukraine are equipped with the muzzle radar? Also the 40 km maximum range applies for base-bleed projectile, not the common NATO HE. Are you sure that Ukraine was supplied with base-bleed ammunition or even SPACIDO kits? 

 

Yes, I know that the standard HE disperion looks like an elipse. I think the values stated in STANAG 4635 gives the longitudinal axis of the elipse.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, Beer said:

Are you sure the Caesars in Ukraine are equipped with the muzzle radar?

 

The guns transferred were taken directly from the French army stock so they should have it and it can be seen on the video we have from the Caesar in Ukraine :

 

Spoiler

 

Spoiler

0_1ba1c3_b183d1f8_orig

 

33 minutes ago, Beer said:

Also the 40 km maximum range applies for base-bleed projectile, not the common NATO HE. Are you sure that Ukraine was supplied with base-bleed ammunition or even SPACIDO kits? 

 

As for the the ammunition Ukraine received, unfortunately I have no idea. Though as I said even with plain dumb HE round, the radar should help somewhat with internal ballistics correction for the next shell (by how much though, I have no idea). For comparison the PzH 2000 (155mm L52 as well) apparently achieve a range of 30 to 36 km using DM121 (which should be a basic HE round, @SH_MM?).

 

No matter how you look at it, 22km is far from using the full capability of those guns (even when using regular ammunition). It may be in order to achieve greater accuracy and limiting the exposure time, but with only 6 of those guns for now, that's probably not how they should be used. In my opinion (for the little it's worth^^) they should use their range to surprise the Russians where they think they are safe from regular artillery. Yes shoot & scoot is what the system is designed for, but that's still taking a lot of risks with weapons they have in a very small number. Even if the guns can leave the area before the shells land, Russian UAV are probably looking for enemy artillery at around 20 km from the "frontline". That being said, I obviously don't have all the informations and there may be a very good reason (some already cited here) as to why the Ukrainian are limiting themselves to barely over 20 km.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Serge said:

About CAESAR in Ukraine :

- firing sequence of 4min 20sec ;

- trained in France in 2 weeks ;

- 80 artillery pieces destroyed claimed.

https://www.francetvinfo.fr/monde/europe/manifestations-en-ukraine/guerre-en-ukraine-des-artilleurs-ukrainiens-utilisent-des-armes-francaises_5180191.html

 

I think that throwing ridiculous numbers around doesn't help anything. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Printscreen of the second video in the thread (+ other screen of the Caesar management system) :

ndj8.jpg

 

@BeerSeem like the shells they are using are of French origin.

 

For the fuzes I can guess that "FRAPPE FR" stands for impact fuze (Fr) while "RALECF3 FR" stands for Radioélectrique F3 (probably programmable fuze for airburst/delayed/proximity fuze?).

 

As for the shells they are the OEF4 and OEF1. The OE (Obus Explosif) F4 is apparently the LU211 in Nexter's catalogue with a range of 40 km (base bleed) when fired from an L52. As for the OEF1, my guess is that it is the LU107 which is a derivative of the US M107 with a slightly improved range (22 km claimed) and that can be fired from L52 gun using a reduced propellant charge.

 

So all the range to the target claimed around 20 km could be the result of using the LU 107 which caps out around this range.

 

As for TCM, it stands for Top Charge Module.

 

In the second video, in the status screen, on the gun side (right) the "Trajectory correction" can be seen in red, which could mean that the Ukrainians didn't get guided shells or SPACIDO compatibles ones.

 

If anyone can understand what the guy is saying that would help^^

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just a few words to this photo from your link because both things are new.

Tatra.jpg

 

The first is the heavy Tatra ARV Treva 30 which is equipped with 30 ton crane and 25 ton winch. The second vehicle shows most likely the configuration for Belgian army, i.e. with a new armoured cabin. 

 

CSG should show also a new development step of their SPGH now with 52 caliber gun. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hello
My pics at eurosatory : 

XLR : https://bit.ly/3tBwPba

Jaguar : https://bit.ly/3HsNGTm

Griffon & Serval : https://bit.ly/3NYhlpP

TItus : https://bit.ly/3xyRpKi

VAB Mk III : https://bit.ly/3OjL6B4

Caesar : https://bit.ly/3HtbNRG

Scarabée https://bit.ly/3Op3hFT

I'm still at eurosatory tomorow, let me know on discord if u need something, i'll try to get a bit of time to take a shoot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Proposed AMX-30 upgrade by EODH :

 

AMX-30.jpg

Spoiler

AMX-30_2.jpg

Somewhat similar to the Leopard 1 C2 I guess :

 

Quote

In collaboration with Approved Partners and Supplierswe offer complete upgrade packages in order to replace obsolete components, to ensure maintainability and the integration of current technologies, to improve mobility, survivability, firepower and interoperability.

  • The chassis hull is stretched and reinforced to accommodate a new power pack based on a turbo-diesel engine coupled to an automatic cross-drive transmission
  • A new double-pin track system is integrated, and the suspension adapted to the new configuration
  • The entire electrical system is replaced with a new digital vetronics package including advanced sensors and power distribution
  • A 7kW APU is developed specifically for the AMX-30
  • The turret electrical system is replaced by a new digital package for firing circuit, power distribution and control of all turret systems
  • The sighting equipment is replaced by a new generation FCS and GCS
  • The 7.62mm cupola is replaced with a 12.7mm A.A. machine gun
  • An automatic fire suppression system is installed in the engine compartment
  • New generation add-on composite armor on the front arch, sides and roof
  • Side skirts with coverage of most of the suspension
  • Optional perimeter cover with cage type armor

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Kinda putting it here by default, but a very interesting read nonetheless :

 

An essay on French warfare from (late) WW2 to nowadays and how it may be impacted by the lessons being learned in Ukraine, all from a British PoV.

 

https://wavellroom.com/2022/06/22/french-army-warfare/

 

The article start by doing an history of French doctrine and how it evolved through time. Nothing surprising here, manouver to keep the initiative, strike at ennemy weak points using concentrated effects then disperse to avoid retaliations. Mobility, firepower, good information acquisition and quick decision making being key for this kind of doctrine. The downsides being that logistics become quickly very complicated when every battle group is off doing what they think they need doing and a potential lack of resilience if the enemy doesn't lose steam despite the raids conducted by French forces.

 

What I take from the article is that the author is saying that the war in Ukraine is currently showing an advantage to defensive doctrines (where conventionnal artillery is key) and that the French army, with it's lack of "mass", resilience (mainly in the amount of material and ammo available) and shortfall in some capabilities (low altitude air defence for example) will have to rethink it's logistics and size as well as to how conduct agressive actions against a dug-in ennemy.

 

On the other hand the current French army has some strength that coul be leveraged in a conflict analogue to the one in Ukraine. Like already being adept at forces dispersion, having short decision loops (autonomy of low level officiers, infocentric and network based warfare) and the ability to quickly tailor ad-hoc battle groups suited for the current objectives.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 3 weeks later...

VABs arrived in Ukraine :

http://www.opex360.com/wp-content/uploads/vab-ukraine-20220729.jpg

Nothing ground breaking, it's just an APC and the one seen in the tweet is in its barebone configuration (VAB VTT with nothing but a manual 7,62 on top).

 

Spoiler
  • 13,8 tons
  • 320 hp
  • 10 dismount + 2 crew
  • 110 km/h top speed (about 8 km/h in water)
  • Protected against 7,62 mm all around but no mines protection to speak off (at least in the base version)

 

Now that the Griffon are starting to be delivered in significant numbers we should be able to give older VABs to Ukraine in large quantities (we still have 2500 of them in service with over 4000 delivered to the French army). Though most of them are in terrible conditions (or plain not running) given their extensive use in operations.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...
  • 2 weeks later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...