Jump to content
Sturgeon's House

Land 400 Phase 3: Australian IFV

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 806
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts


AS21 rollout:    

Aforementioned video:



I've made some 50 screenshots, all uploaded to twitter






- all could be seen on one page there:


(Though this website used downscaled 1200pix version of those 1920x1080 screenshots,

so in case one wants 1920pix images, it's easier to download them by opening my posts directly at Twitter. Or one could manually add ":large" after ".png"/".jpg" to every image link)


And there is another video, released 12 hours later:


and some 20 screenshots were also posted on Twitter, starting from this tweet:










Another video, unfortunately w/ Korean hardsubs:

dozen of screenshots were posted there:









Half a dozen screenshots from Arirang video were posted there:







Two more interior pics from elsewhere:




Link to post
Share on other sites
22 hours ago, 2805662 said:

AS21 Redback

Seriously?  The exhaust just points straight out the right forward of the hull?  I mean, yes, that is exactly what it does but in this day and age?  No way that will meet the detection requirements as shown.  Cannot be the intent.

Link to post
Share on other sites
14 hours ago, Serge said:

It’s not a bad idea.

Yes, except - L400 Ph3 has Requirements around thermal detectability.   Detect at certain range, identify at certain range.  Having a hot plume sticking out of the front corner is pretty certain to mean cannot comply.  In comparison, LYNX runs exhaust to rear and mixes with radiator efflux.

Link to post
Share on other sites

That exhaust could, should be fatal for their chance of winning land 400 phase 3.


However there are ways to ameliorate it, for instance puma has its exhaust in same spot, and they pre cool the exhaust.  T-15 also have their exhaust in the same spot, but covered by some type of angled reactive armour.


Even an old school diesel's wet scrubber will reduce temperature from 300 Celsius down to 60 Celcius. 


So lots of options, but something needs to be demonstrated by Hanwha, or else...

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 2 weeks later...
1 hour ago, DIADES said:

CGI or splice bullshit.  No cameras on turret so....  Real able to see thru the steel turret tech or, pure CGI

EOS - Electro Optic Systems


Both the hull and turret are loaded with sensors, its just a question of how well they talk to each other.

Link to post
Share on other sites
24 minutes ago, VPZ said:

LOL, there are cameras on the chassis

yes there are.  They are drivers cameras that have the FoV a driver needs.  There are no cameras on the turret, no flank cameras anywhere.  So, not Iron Vision which uses stitched together camera images to mimic seeing through the hull and turret.  The video tries to show the turret moving with the operators head movements.  But he can't see anything cos - no situational awareness cameras.  So, PR puffery.


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Similar Content

    • By Serge
      The Armored Combat Vehicle Puma started as a privat-venture betwen Krauss-Maffei and Diehl in 1983. The two first prototypes were ready first in spring 1986 with a Kuka 20mm two men turret and second in autumn with a Diehl 120mm mortar turret. 
      ACV-Puma was intented as an export armored vehicle of the 16-28 t class. 

      By 1983 original concept, it was offered with two engine options (400/600hp) to cope with the level of armor protection asked.
      The running gear was a mixt of both Leopard-1 and 2 components :
      - Leo-1 : road wheels, track support rollers, torsion bars and even the driver's seat ;
      - Leo-2 : track adjuster, cooling system components and sproket hub.
      It was possible to run the engine outside of its compartment. 
      In 1988, the concept was improved further :
      - the class range reached 38t ;
      - the engines offer was 440 or 750hp strong ;
      - the chassis was now available in two length (5/6 road wheels) and  hight/low profil hull (20cm).

      The ACV-Puma was a contender at the Norwegian IFV programme from 1991 and the Turkish 1987 relaunched TIFV programme.
      Norway chose CV-90 and Turkey, the AIFV.
      (If anyone have information about how it was a serious contender, I'm interested)
      It was also evaluated by the Swiss army in 1991. I don't know if it took part to the Char de grenadiers 2000 programme. 

      In 1983´s concept, the difference betwen the low profil hull and the 20cm higher hight profil hull was obtained by a "box shape vertical raised" rear compartment. With the 1988's design, the front slop is now different to achieve a better ballistic protection. 
      When considering documentations of this period, it's important to note the mine/IED protection was not a priority like today. 
      I'll post soon a scan showing general layout of the troop compartment. It's a Marder/BMP old fashion one with soldiers facing outside. 
      Even if it was not a success at exportation, I think ACV-Puma must be known because of both :
      - the outdated combat beliefs of the 80's (still vigourous today) ;
      - and advanced proposal  such as the differential hull length from the drawing board. 
      I have a question :
      Does anyone known if a 6 road wheels chassis was ever built ?
    • By delfosisyu
      I can't read russian or ukraine language so the range of information is very limited for russian AFVs.
      I'd like to have information about how fast turrets of soviet IFVs rotate.
      Especially BMP2, BMP3, BTR-82
    • By Belesarius
      30mm Cannon and Javelins for armament.
      Is that the first vehicle mounting the Jav?
    • By Belesarius
      30mm with airburst capability, and supposedly better mine protection than a Leo 2.

  • Create New...